Abstract
This study deals with the variability of mixing height during daylight hours in the summer months for weak wind regimes. A two-dimensional model was employed using simulated input variables which are quite representative of conditions found over the midwestern United States in late summer and early fall. With the aid of this model and various analytical techniques, the dependence of the urban mixing height on such factors as horizontal advection, downward heat flux across the stable mixing-layer interface, lapse rate in the stable layer, etc., was delineated and compared with actual mixing height variations observed in St. Louis, Missouri during selected days for August, 1972.
The experiment indicated the following: (1) A spatially symmetric surface heating profile over a city is accompanied by a similarly symmetric mixing-height profile in the absence of vertical wind shear; (2) When the same heating assumption is invoked and vertically variable wind profiles are introduced, the model-generated mixing-height contours become increasingly asymmetric with vertical wind shear; (3) The modelled mixing heights are more sensitive to temperature fluctuations than to those of wind over the range of speeds studied (wind speeds ⩽4ms−1); (4) Present operational methods of predicting the time of erosion of an inversion (based upon forecast surface temperature ranges and adiabatic diagram considerations) underestimate breakup time by a factor which is proportional to the amount of available downward heat flux from the stable layer into the mixed layer below.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- a :
-
amplitude of heating
- D :
-
total distance (=200 km)
- F H :
-
a quantity proportional to the downward flux of sensible heat from the stable layer as measured at the top of the mixing layer
- Fs :
-
a quantity proportional to the flux of sensible heat from the Earth's surface as measured at the top of the surface layer
- H :
-
height of the mixing layer minus the height of the surface layer (approximated in this study to be the height of the mixing layer)
- H 0 :
-
initial height of the mixing layer
- k :
-
refers to individual grid numbers
- K :
-
the total number of grid points
- l :
-
refers to the individual time steps
- L :
-
the total number of time steps
- R :
-
a combination of constants R≡α/(α+1)γ s
- t :
-
an independent variable, time; also the time step
- u :
-
wind component along thex axis at the inversion interface
- u 1 :
-
wind speed in the mixing layer
- w :
-
wind speed along theZ axis
- W H :
-
vertical motion due to subsidence
- x :
-
a horizontal grid distance (5 km)
- X :
-
an independent variable signifying the direction paralleling the mean wind flow
- Z :
-
vertical coordinate, usually height
- α :
-
ratio of the magnitudes of downward to upward sensible heat fluxes into the mixing layer
- γ s :
-
lapse rate in the stable inversion air
- θ :
-
potential temperature
- ()′:
-
turbulent component of () in the mixing layer
- ()* :
-
indicates a dimensionless quantity
References
Angell, J. K., Hoecker, W. H., Dickson, C. R., and Pack, D. H.: 1973, ‘Urban Influence on a Strong Daytime Air Flow as Determined from Tetroon Flights’,J. Appl. Meteorol. 12, 924–936.
Ball, F. K.: 1960, ‘Control of Inversion Height by Surface Heating’,Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 86, 483–494.
Bergstrom, R. W., Jr. and Viskanta, R.: 1973, ‘Modelling of the Effects of Gaseous and Particulate Pollutants in the Urban Atmosphere. Part I: Thermal Structure’,J. Appl. Meteorol. 12, 901–912.
Betts, A. K.: 1973, ‘Nonprecipitating Cumulus Convection and its Parameterization’,Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 99, 178–196.
Bornstein, R.: 1968, ‘Observations of the Urban Heat Island Effect in New York City’,J. Appl. Meteorol. 7, 575–582.
Carson, D. J.: 1973, ‘The Development of a Dry Inversion-Capped Convectively Unstable Boundary Layer’,Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 99, 450–467.
Clarke, J. F.: 1969, ‘Nocturnal Urban Boundary Layer over Cincinnati, Ohio’,Monthly Weather Rev. 98, 582–589.
Deardorff, J. W.: 1967, ‘Empirical Dependence of the Eddy Coefficient for Heat Upon Stability Above the Lowest 50 Meters’,J. Appl. Meteorol. 6, 631–643.
Deardorff, J. W., Willis, G. E., and Lilly, D. K.: 1969, ‘Laboratory Investigation of Nonsteady Penetrative Convection’,J. Fluid Mech. 35, 7–31.
Haltiner, G. J.: 1971,Numerical Weather Prediction, New York, John Wiley and Sons, 317 pp.
Haltiner, G. J. and Martin, F. L.: 1957,Dynamical and Physical Meteorology, New York, McGraw Hill, 470 pp.
Holzworth, G. C.: 1964, ‘Estimates of Mean Maximum Mixing Depths in the Contiguous United States’,Monthly Weather Rev. 92, 235–242.
Koprov, B. M. and Tsvang, L. R.: 1965, ‘Direct Measurements of Turbulent Heat Flux from an Airplane’,Izv. Atmos. Oceanic Phys. Series 1, 371–374 (AGU translation).
Landsberg, H. E.: 1972, ‘Inadvertant Atmospheric Modification Through Urbanization’, TN BN 741, Univ. of Maryland, 73 pp.
LaPenta, K. D.: 1973, ‘An Empirical Method of Forecasting the Diurnal Variation in the Mixing Depth at St. Louis’, M.S. Thesis, Saint Louis University, St. Louis Mo., 78 pp.
Leahey, D. M. and Friend, J. P.: 1971, ‘A Model for Predicting the Depth of the Mixing Layer over an Urban Heat Island with Application to New York City’,J. Appl. Meteorol. 10, 1162–1173.
Lenschow, D. H. and Johnson, W. B.: 1968, ‘Concurrent Airplane and Balloon Measurements of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Structure over a Forest’,J. Appl. Meteorol. 7, 79–89.
Lilly, D. K.: 1968, ‘Models of Cloud-Topped Mixed Layers Under a Strong Inversion’,Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 94, 292–309.
Martin, D. E. and Hull, L. J.: 1974, ‘Some Techniques for Evaluating the Quality of Air Pollution Measurements and Correlations Between These Data and Meteorological Variables’, manuscript submitted for publication, 14 pp.
McElroy, J. L., Clarke, J. F., and Godowitch, J. M.: 1973, ‘Urban Boundary Layer Structure During Sunrise-Sunset Transitional Periods’, 1973 Fall Annual Meeting, American Geophysical Union, San Francisco, Calif., 10–13 December.
Oke, T. R. and East, C.: 1971, ‘The Urban Boundary Layer in Montreal’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 1, 411–437.
Padmanabhamurty, B. and Munn, R. E.: 1973, ‘A Case Study of Mixing Height Variations in the Toronto Area’,Atmosphere 11, 21–25.
Plate, E. J.: 1971,Aerodynamic Characteristics of Atmospheric Boundary Layers, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Critical Review Series, Natl. Tech. Inform. Serv., Dept. of Commerce, 190 pp.
Readings, C. J.: 1973, ‘Some Aspects of the Cardington Research Program’,Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 99, 764–767.
Spangler, T. C. and Dirks, R. A.: 1972, ‘Mesoscale Variations of the Urban Mixing Depth’, AMS Conference on Urban Environment and Second Conference on Biometeorology, Philadelphia, Pa., Oct. 31–Nov. 2, 37–42.
Stull, R. B.: 1973, ‘Inversion Rise Model Based on Penetrative Convection’,J. Atmospheric Sci. 30, 1092–1099.
Tennekes, H.: 1973, ‘A Model for the Dynamics of the Inversion Above a Convective Boundary Layer’,J. Atmospheric Sci. 30, 558–567.
Tennekes, H.: 1974, ‘The Atmospheric Boundary Layer’,Physics Today 27, 52–63.
Uthe, E. E.: 1972, ‘Lidar-Derived Aerosol Structure over St. Louis, Missouri, During Metromex 1972’, Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, Calif., 42 pp.
Wuerch, D. E.: 1970, ‘A Comparison of Observed and Calculated Mixing Depth’, ESSA Technical Memorandum, WBTM CR-36, 15 pp.
Young, E.: 1972,Partial Differential Equations, Boston, Allyn and Bacon, Inc., p. 43–56.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barnum, D.C., Rao, G.V. Role of advection and penetrative convection in affecting the mixing-height variations over an idealized metropolitan area. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 8, 497–514 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02153567
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02153567