Skip to main content
Log in

Weak-measurement elements of reality

  • Part IV. Invited Papers Dedicated to Max Jammer
  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A brief review of the attempts to define “elements of reality” in the framework of quantum theory is presented. It is noted that most definitions of elements of reality have in common the feature to be a definite outcome of some measurement. Elements of reality are extended to pre- and post- selected systems and to measurements which fulfill certain criteria of weakness of the coupling. Some features of the newly introduced concepts are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen,Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Jammer,The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Jammer,The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. S. Bell,Physics 1, 195 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Redhead,Incompleteness, Nonlocality, und Realism (Clarendon, Oxford. 1987), p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. von Neumann,Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Aharonov and L. Vaidman,Phys. Rev. A 41, 11 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Vaidman,Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3369–3372 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Vaidman, inSymposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics. P. J. Lahti. P. Bush, and P. Mittelstaedt, eds. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1993), pp. 406–417.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Aharonov and L. Vaidman,J. Phys. A 24, 2315–2315 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  11. It is interesting that fordichotomic variables the following is true: If the weak value is equal to one of the eigenvalues, i.e.,A n=a1 is the weak-measurement element of reality, thenA=a 1, is an element of reality in the strong sense, and ideal measurement ofA yieldsa 1 with probability one, see Ref. 10..

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Bohm,Phys. Rev. 85, 97 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Aharonov and L. Vaidman, inBohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal. J. T. Dishing, A. Fine, and S. Goldstein, eds. (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Aharonov and L. Vaidman,Phys. Lett. A 178, 38 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Aharonov and L. Vaidman,Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 755, 361 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Aharonov, S. Massar, S. Popescu, J. Tollaksen, and L. Vaidman,Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996).

  17. H. Everett,Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 454–462 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vaidman, L. (1993). “On schizophrenic experiences of the neutron or why we should believe in the many-worlds interpretation of quantum theory,” Tel-Aviv University preprint, TAUP 2058-93.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported in part by grant 614/65 of the Basic Research Foundation (administered by the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vaidman, L. Weak-measurement elements of reality. Found Phys 26, 895–906 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02148832

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02148832

Keywords

Navigation