Skip to main content
Log in

Use of inferior vena cava filters in the Medicare population

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Vascular Surgery

Abstract

To examine the use of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters, we performed a population-based study using a 5% random sample of the United States Medicare population (1.25 million persons). Filter placement and its timing relative to diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) were determined using both hospital and physician Medicare billing codes after detailed review of large samples of complete individual claims records. Comorbid conditions and mortality were also noted. From July 1986 through June 1989, a total of 806 patients in the sample population received IVC filters. Mortality rates after filter placement were high: 16% during initial hospitalization, 32% within 6 months of filter placement, and 48% after 2 years. However, only 3 (1%) of 423 patients who underwent filter placement without the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) suffered PE within 1 year of filter placement. Use of IVC filters increased significantly over the study period (p <0.001).Rates of filter placement among the nine census divisions of the United States differed significantly (p<0.001).An East-West trend was notable with the highest rate (37 filters/100,000 enrollees/yr) in New England, as compared with 14 filters/100,000 enrollees/yr in the Pacific Division. No explanation for these regional-differences was evident after patient demographics and comorbidity were examined. Vena cava filters prevent PE for at least 1 year after placement. The frequency of IVC filter use in elderly patients is increasing and varies substantially by region. Although reasons for these trends are unclear, these findings suggest the need for uniform practice guidelines for IVC filter placement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Greenfield LJ, Alexander EL. Current status of surgical therapy for deep vein thrombosis. Am J Surg 1985;150:64–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Magnant JG, Walsh DB, Juravsky LI, et al. Current usage of inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Surg 1992;16:701–706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Emerson RH Jr, Cross R, Head WC. Prophylactic and early therapeutic use of the Greenfield filter in hip and knee joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1991;6:129–135.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vaughan BK, Knezevich S, Lombardi AV Jr, et al. Use of the Greenfield filter to prevent fatal pulmonary embolism associated with total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1989;71:1542–1548.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rohrer MJ, Scheidler MG, Wheeler B, et al. Extended indications for placement of an inferior vena cava filter. J Vasc Surg 1989;10:44–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Becker DM, Philbrick JT, Selby JB. Inferior vena cava filter. Indications, safety, effectiveness. Arch Intern Med 1992;152: 1985–1994.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kniffin WD Jr, Baron JA, Barrett JA, et al. The epidemiology of pulmonary embolus and deep vein thrombosis in the elderly. Arch Intern Med 1994;154:861–866.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rothman KJ. Modern Epidemiology. Boston: Little, Brown, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Breslow NE, Day NE. Statistical Methods in Cancer Research. Vol II. The Design and Analysis of Cohort Studies. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  10. McCullagh P, Nelder JA. Generalized Linear Models, 2nd ed. London: Chapman & Hall, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Peto R, Pike MC, Armitage P, et al. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. Analysis and examples. Br J Cancer 1977;35:1–39.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fisher ES, Whaley FS, Krushat WM, et al. The accuracy of Medicare's hospital claims data: Progress has been made, but problems remain. Am J Public Health 1992;82:243–248.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gillum RF. Pulmonary embolism and thrombophlebitis in the United States, 1970–1985. Am Heart J 1987;114:1262–1264.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lilienfield DE, Godbold JH, Burke GL, et al. Hospitalization and case fatality for pulmonary embolism in the twin cities: 1979–1984. Am Heart J 1990;120:392–395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Feinleib M, Havlik RJ, Gillum RF, et al. Coronary heart disease and related procedures. National hospital discharge survey data. Circulation 1989;79(Suppl I):I-13–I-18.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Paul-Shaheen P, Clark JD, Williams D. Small area analysis: A review and analysis of the North American literature. J Health Polit Policy Law 1987;12:741–809.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chassin MR, Brook RH, Park RE, et al. Variations in the use of medical and surgical services by the Medicare population. N Engl J Med 1986;314:285–290.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wennberg JE, Freeman JL, Shelton RM, et al. Hospital use and mortality among Medicare beneficiaries in Boston and New Haven. N Engl J Med 1989;321:1168–1173.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by the National Institutes of Aging, grant R0 1 AG 07-146, and by a training grant from the National Library of Medicine (NIH 5 T15 LM07044) to Dr. Birkmeyer.

About this article

Cite this article

Walsh, D.B., Birkmeyer, J.D., Barrett, J.A. et al. Use of inferior vena cava filters in the Medicare population. Annals of Vascular Surgery 9, 483–487 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02143864

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02143864

Keywords

Navigation