Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Providing for individual differences: A history of the intelligence testing movement in North America

  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Achilles, P. S. Commemorative address on the twentieth anniversary of the Psychological Corporation and to honor its founder, James McKeen Cattell.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1941,25, 60–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S.The outsiders—Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S. Getting nowhere: Programmed class stagnation.Society, 1972,9, 42–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capen, S. P. The effect of the world war 1914–1918 on American colleges and universities.Educational Record, 1940,21, 42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Foundation.Annual report. New York: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Foundation.Annual report. New York: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Foundation.Bulletin. New York: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Foundation.Bulletin. New York: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, J. M. The first years of the Psychological Corporation. In,J. McKeen Cattell papers. Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress, Archives, 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, J. M. The Psychological Corporation.Annals of the American Academy, 1923,110, 165–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, J. M. Present status. In,J. McKeen Cattell papers. Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress, Archives, 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, J. M.James McKeen Cattell—Man of science. Vols. I and II. Lancaster, Pa.: Science Press, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cities reporting the use of homogeneous grouping and of the Winnetka technique and the Dalton plan. U.S. Bureau of Education, City School Leaflet No.22, Washington, D.C., 1926.

  • Coats, R. H. Canada. In,International migration. Vol. II. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curti, M.The social ideas of American educators. Totowa, N.J.: Littlefield Adams, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, R. S.Professional problems in psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deffenbaugh, W. S. Uses of intelligence and achievement tests in 215 cities. U. S. Bureau of Education, City School Leaflet No. 20, Washington, D.C., 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, V. E.Mental tests and the classroom teacher. New York: World Book, 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, C. S. (Ed.)Leadership and chronology 1918–1968. Washington, D.C.: American Council of Education. 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, R. Mental engineering after the war.American Review of Reviews, June 1919,60, 606–610. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, R. Mental engineering during the war.American Review of Reviews, May 1919,59, 504–508. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellul, J.Propaganda. New York: Random House, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, F. N. Sorting the students.Educational Review, 1924,68, 169–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Education Board.Annual report. New York: The Board, 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, H. H.The Kallikak family. New York: Macmillan, 1912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, H. H.Human efficiency and levels of intelligence. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, V. T. The intelligence of Chinese children in San Francisco.Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1926,6, 43–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty, M. E. Recent developments in measuring human capacities.Journal of Educational Research, 1921,3, 241–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hincks, C. M. A study of mental deficiency in a Canadian province.Journal of Psycho-Asthenics, 1927,32, 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, L. S.Gifted children. New York: Macmillan, 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzner, B.Reality construction in society. Cambridge: Schenkman, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human sterilization today. Human Betterment Foundation, 1938.

  • Jamieson, E., & Sandiford, P. The mental capacity of southern Ontario Indians.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1928,19, 317–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd, C. H.Education and social progress. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, I. L. Examinations and their substitutes in the United States. In.Twenty-eighth bulletin. New York: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karier, C.Roots of crisis. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevles, D. J. Testing the army's intelligence: Psychologists and the military in World War I.Journal of American History, 1969,55, 565–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, C. R. Education in the army 1919–1925.Educational Record (Suppl. 1), 1926,7, 1–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, C. R. The American way.Educational Record, 1930,11, 278–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, R. Race and immigration: The politics of intelligence testing. In C. Karier (Ed.),Shaping the American educational state. New York: Free Press, 1975. Pp.316–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murchison, C.A history of psychology in autobiography. Vol.II. London: Oxford University Press, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillsbury, W. B. Selection—A unnoticed function of education.Scientific Monthly, 1921,12, 62–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintner, R. A non-language group intelligence test.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1919,3, 199–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popenoe, P.Sterilization for human betterment. New York: Macmillan, 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Round pegs and square holes.Scientific American. Feb. 1. 1919, p. 92.

  • Strong, E. K. War, psychology and education.School and Society, 1919,9, 697–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tait, W. D. Psychology, education and sociology.School and Society, 1925,21, 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M. The significance of intelligence tests.Journal of Psycho-Asthenics, 1914,18, 119–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M.Terman Group Test of Mental Ability. Yonkers: World Book, 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M.Intelligence tests and school reorganization. New York: World Book, 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M. The American Psychological Association.Science, 1924,59, 546–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M.Genetic studies of genius. Vol.I. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M. The independent study plan at Stanford University.School and Society, 1926,24, 96–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M. Book review.Journal of Higher Education, 1939,10, 111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M. et al.National Intelligence Test. Yonkers: World Book, 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M., et al.Stanford Achievement Test. Yonkers: World Book, 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M., et al.New Stanford Achievement Test. Yonkers: World Book, 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L.The principles of teaching. New York: Mason-Henry Press, 1906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L.Individuality. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. Scientific personnel work in the army.Science, 1919,49, 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyack, D. B.The one best system. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress, House.Special committee to investigate tax exempt foundations—Summary of activities. June 9. 1954.

  • Ward, H. H. Vocational training in Canada.American Federationist, 1929,36, 201–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, B. D. The cooperative test service.Educational Record, 1931,12, 244–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, B. D. Major strategy versus minor tactics in educational testing.Baltimore Bulletin of Education, 1934,13, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, B. D. The major strategy of guidance.Educational Record, 1934,15, 419–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, B. D. Ten years of the cooperative test service.Educational Record, 1940,21, 369–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M. J. CPA: The first ten years.Canadian Psychologist, 1974,15, 112–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerkes, R. M.New world of science. New York: Century, 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerkes, R. M. Psychological examining in the United States army. In,National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 10. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zook, G. F.The president's annual report. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zook, G. F.The president's annual report. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Indiana University, USA

    Russell Marks

Authors
  1. Russell Marks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marks, R. Providing for individual differences: A history of the intelligence testing movement in North America. Interchange 7, 3–16 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02142626

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02142626

Keywords

Search

Navigation