Skip to main content
Log in

Psychological adjustment in a college-level program of marked academic acceleration

  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The questionnaire responses of 24 markedly accelerated young students were compared with those of 24 regular-aged university students, 23 National Merit Scholars, and 27 students who had qualified for acceleration but instead elected to participate in high school. Measures included the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, California Psychological Inventory, the Tennessee Self-Concept Scale, and the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment. Accelerated students differed minimally from the college-aged groups, and not at all from high-ability age mates, on all of the measures, a finding contrary to the expectation that skipping high school is likely to be deleterious to one's adjustment. Both groups of normal-aged college students were more socially assertive. The accelerated students were less conforming and conventional than the others, but mean differences were small and not indicative of admustment difficulties. The study provides no basis for concern about the typical psychological and social adjustment of accelerated students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berg, A., and Larsen, R. (1945). A comparative study of students entering college one or more semesters before graduation from high school.J. Educ. Res. 39: 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., and Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.J. Consult. Psychol. 24: 345–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daurio, S. P. (1979). Educational enrichment versus acceleration: A review of the literature. In George, W. C., Cohn, S. J., & Stanley, J. C. (eds.),Educating the Gifted. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitts, W. H. (1965).Tennessee Self-Concept Scale Manual. Counselor Recordings and Tests, Nashville, Tenn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fund for the Advancement of Education. (1957).They Went to College Early. Research Division of the Fund, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, W. C., Cohn, S. J., and Stanley, J. C. (eds.). (1979).Educating the Gifted. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H. G. (1969).Manual for the California Psychological Inventory (rev. ed.). Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, M. T., Siegel, J. M., and Leitch C. J. (1983). The nature and importance of attachment relationships to parents and peers during adolescence.J. Youth Adolescence 12: 373–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, S. R., and McKinley, J. C. (1940). A Multiphasic Personality Schedule (Minnesota): I. Construction of the schedule.J. Psychol. 10: 249–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, L. S. (1929).Gifted Children: Their Nature and Nurture Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. McV. (1961).Intelligence and Experience. Ronald, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janos, P. M., and Robinson, N. M. (1985). The performance of students in a program of radical acceleration at the university level.Gifted Child Q. 29(4): 175–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, D. P. (Ed.). (1946).Intellectual Talent: Research and Development. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, D. P., Weigand, S., and Fox, L. (1974). Behavior of precocious boys in a college course. In Stanley, J. C., Keating, D. P., and Fox, L. H. (eds.),Mathematical Talent: Discovery, Description, and Development. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessinger, L., and Martinson, R. (1961). The use of the California Psychological Inventory with gifted pupils.Personnel and Guidance J. 39: 572–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, C. C. (1946). Gifted children. In Carmichael L. (ed.),Manual of Child Psychology. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montour, K. M. (1976). Three precocious boys: What happened to them?Gift. Child. Q. 20: 173–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montour, K. M. (1977). The highly precocious: How well did they succeed? In Stanley, J. C., George, W., and Solana, C. (eds.),Educational Programs and Intellectual Prodigies. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noeth, R. J. (1978).Washington Pre-College Counselor's Guide. Washington Pre-College Testing Program, Seattle, Wash.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollin, L. (1983). The effects of acceleration on social and emotional development of gifted students. In Benbow, C., and Stanley, J. (eds.),Academic Precocity: Aspects of Its Development. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey, S. L. (1949). Educational Acceleration: Appraisal and Basic Problems.Ohio State Bureau of Educational Research Monographs, #31. The Ohio State University Press, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. (1979a).Development in Judging Moral Issues. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. (1979b).Manual for the Defining Issues Test. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, H. (1983). A case for radical acceleration. In Benbow, C. and Stanley, J. (eds.),Academic Precocity: Aspects of Its Development. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, H., and Robinson, N. (1982). The optimal match: Devising the best compromise for the highly gifted student. In Feldman, D. (ed.),New Directions for Child Development: Development Approaches to Giftedness and Creativity (Vol. 17). Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, N. M. (1985). College without high school: The Early Entrance Program at the University of Washington.Academic Talent 2(1): 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, L. A. (1965). Idealization of self and social adjustment.J. Consult. Psychol. 26: 487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, J. (1976). Using tests to discover talent. In Keating, D. P. (ed),Intellectual Talent: Research and Development. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, J., George, W., and Salano, C. (eds.) (1978).Educational Programs and Intellectual Prodigies. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, J., Keating, D. P., and Fox, L. (eds.) (1974).Mathematical Talent: Discovery, Description, and Development. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, D. S., Haier, R. J., and Keating, D. P. (1974). Personality characteristics of mathematically precocious boys. In Stanley, J. C., Keating, D. P., and Fox, L. H. (eds.),Mathematical Talent: Discovery, Description, and Development. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research reported here and, in part, the program it describes, were funded by a grant from the William H. Donner Foundation, the support of which is gratefully acknowledged.

Received Ph.D. from Standford University. Research interests include the development of gifted and mentally retarded individuals.

Received Ph.D. from Ohio State University. Research interests include psychosocial aspects of talent development.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robinson, N.M., Janos, P.M. Psychological adjustment in a college-level program of marked academic acceleration. J Youth Adolescence 15, 51–60 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02140783

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02140783

Keywords

Navigation