Skip to main content
Log in

Event and story structure recall by children with specific learning disabilities, language impairments, and normally achieving children

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the ability of children with specific learning disabilities (SLD), children with language impairments (LI), and children who are normally achieving (NA) to recall the events and story structures of a narrative and an expository text. Effects of group, verbal age, text structure, and order of presentation on recall as measured through listening comprehension were studied. Sixty students who were matched on verbal age served as subjects. Results suggested differences between the LI and SLD groups on text recall. Differences were also evident for text type, with recall of narrative text typically being superior to recall of expository text. In general, the performance of the group with SLD was similar to that of the NA group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvermann, D. E., & Boothby, P. R. (1982). Text differences: Children's perceptions at the transition stage of reading.The Reading Teacher, 35, 298–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applebee, A. N. (1978).The child's concept of story. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aulls, M. W. (1982).Developing readers in today's elementary school. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, S. J., & Taylor, B. M. (1981). The effects of text type and familiarity on the nature of information recalled by readers. In M. L. Kamil & A. J. Moe (Eds.),Perspectives on reading research and instruction. Twenty-ninth Yearbook of the National Reading Conference.

  • Britton, B. K., Graesser, A. C., Glynn, S. M., Hamilton, T., & Penland, M. (1983). Use of cognitive capacity of reading: Effects of some content features of text.Discourse Processes, 6, 39–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., & Smiley, S. S. (1977). Rating the importance of structural units of prose passages: A problem of metacognitive development.Child Development, 48, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caro, D., & Schneider, P. (1983). Creating referents in text: A comparison of learning disabled and normal adolescents' text.Proceedings of the Wisconsin Symposium of Research in Child Language Disorders. Madison: University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, P. J., & Schumacher (1975). Developmental trends in the abstraction and recall of relevant versus irrelevant thematic information from connected verbal materials.Child Development, 46, 598–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danner, F. W. (1976). Children's understanding of intersentence organization in the recall of short descriptive passage.Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 174–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981).Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englert, C. S., & Hiebert, E. H. (1984). Children's developing awareness of test structures in expository materials.Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(1), 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feagans, L., & McKinney, J. (1982).Longitudinal studies of learning disabled children. Paper presented to the Association for children with Learning Disabilities, Chicago.

  • Feagans, L., & Short, E. J. (1984). Developmental differences in the comprehension and production of narratives by reading disabled and normally achieving children.Child Development, 55, 1727–1736.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, N. J., & Spiegel, D. L. (1983). Enhancing children's reading comprehension through instruction in narrative structure.Journal of Reading Behavior, 15, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedle, R. (Ed.) (1979).New directions in discourse processing (Vol. 2). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graybeal, M. (1981). Memory for stories in language-impaired children.Applied Psycholinguistics, 2, 269–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, P. L., Ripich, D. N., & Dastoli, S. L. (1986). Story structure, cohesion and propositions in story recalls by learning disabled and non-learning disabled children.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15(6), 539–556.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, P. L., Ripich, D. N., Dastoli, S. L., & Nwakanma, O. N. (1985). Story grammar organization in story recall by learning disabled and nondisabled children.The Mental Retardation and Learning Disability Bulletin, 13, 92–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M., & Hasan, R. (1976).Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, C. L. (1978). Story retelling used with average and learning disabled readers as a measure of reading comprehension.Learning Disability Quarterly, 1, 62–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N. S., & Mandler, J. M. (1980). A tale of two structures: Underlying and surface forms in stories.Poetics, 9, 51–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. R. (1982). Narratives: A new look at communication problems in older language-disordered children.Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, (3), 144–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinney, M. A. (1985). A language experience approach to training expository text abstracted.The Reading Teacher, 2, 854–856.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. (1974).The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. (1977a). On comprehending stories. In E. Just & A. Carpenter (Eds.),Cognitive processes in comprehension (pp. 33–62), Hillsdale, NJ: Colbanar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. (1977b). Reading comprehension as a function of text structure. In E. Just & A. Carpenter (Eds.),Cognitive processes in comprehension (pp. 78–105). Hillsdale, NJ: Colbanar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinstch, W., & van Dijk, J. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension on production.Psychological Review, 85, (5), 363–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liles, B.Z. (1985). Cohesion in the narratives of normal and language-disordered children.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28(1), 123–133.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liles, B. Z. (1987). Episode organization and cohesive conjunctives in narratives of children with and without language disorder.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30(2), 185–196.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Longacre, R. E. (1976).An anatomy of speech notions. Lisse, Belgium: The Peter de Ridder Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, J., & Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall.Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, W., Egner, C., & Foreman, D., (1979). Story comprehension as a function of modality and reading ability.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12(3), 194–197.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, L. M. (1982a). Awareness of text structure: Effects on children's recall of expository text.Reading Research Quarterly, 17(4), 581–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, L. M. (1982b). The influence of metacognitive knowledge of expository text on discourse recall. In J. Niles & L. Harris (Eds.),New inquiries in reading research and instruction, Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, L. M., & Richgels, P. J. (1985). Teaching expository text structure to elementary students.The Reading Teacher, 2, 739–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B. J. F., Brandt, D. M., & Bluth, G. J. (1980). Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students.Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 72–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B. J. F., & Frecdle, R. O. (1984). Effects of discourse type on recall.American Educational Research Journal, 21(1), 121–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B. J. F., & McConkie, G. W. (1973). What is recalled after hearing a passage?Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(1), 109–117.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Page, J. L., & Stewart, S. R. (1985). Story grammar skills in school-age children.Topics in Language Disorders, 5, 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccolo, D. (1987). Expository text structure: Teaching and learning strategies.The Reading Teacher, 40(9), 838–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prutting, C. A., Bagshaw, N., Goldstein, H., Juskowitz, S., & Umen, I. (1978). Clinician child discourse: Some preliminary questions.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 43(2), 123–139.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ripich, D. N., & Griffith, P. L. (1985, November).Story structure cohesion and propositions in learning disabled children. Paper Presented at American Speech Language Hearing Association Convention, Washington, DC.

  • Ripich, D. N., & Griffith, P. L. (1988). Narrative abilities of children with learning and nondisabled children: Story structure, cohesion and propositions.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 165–173.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. Freedle (Ed.),New directions in discourse processing (Vol. 2), Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, N. L., & Trabasso, T. (1982). What's in a story: Critical issues in story comprehension. In R. Glaser (Ed.),Advances in the psychology of instruction (pp. 132–165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. M. (1980). Children's memory for expository text after reading.Reading Research Quarterly, 15(3), 399–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. M., & Samuels, S. J. (1983). Children's use of text structure in the recall of expository materials.American Educational Research Journal, 20(4), 517–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndyke, P. W., & Hayes-Roth, B. (1979). The use of schemata in the acquisition and transfer of knowledge.Cognitive Psychology, 11, 82–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndyke, P. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1980). A critique of schema-based theories of human story memory.Poetics, 9, 23–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuch, S. (1977). The production of coherent narrative texts by older language impaired children.The South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 24, 42–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vacca, J., Vacca, R., & Gove, M. (1991).Reading and learning to read. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1974).Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westby, C. E. (1982). Cognitive and linguistic aspects of children's narrative development.Communication Disorders, 7, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westby, C. E. (1984). Development of narrative language abilities. In G. P. Wallach & K. G. Butler (Eds.),Language learning disabilities in school-age children (pp. 103–127). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whaley, J. F. (1981a). Story grammars and reading instruction.Reading Teacher, 34, 762–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whaley, J. F. (1981b). Readers expectations for story structure.Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 772–784.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Copmann, K.S.P., Griffith, P.L. Event and story structure recall by children with specific learning disabilities, language impairments, and normally achieving children. J Psycholinguist Res 23, 231–248 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02139086

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02139086

Keywords

Navigation