Abstract
Sixty-four undergraduates wrote responses to the question, “When faced with a moral dilemma, what issues or concerns influence your decision?” The responses were coded according to one or more of 13 themes by independent raters blind to the subjects' gender. Six of the themes were identified as “feminine” themes and seven as “masculine” themes on the basis of previous work by Gilligan ([1982],In a Different Voice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts), Kohlberg ([1976], “Moral Stages and Moralization: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach,” in Lickona, T. [ed.],Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research, and social Issues, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York), and others. Only one association between gender and the presence of any given theme reached statistical significance: Thus, there is little evidence to support the idea that men and women differ in their reports of how they think about moral dilemmas. For all subjects, the average proportion of possible feminine themes in a response was higher than the proportion of possible masculine themes. This finding supports the idea than an exclusive focus on themes such as rights and responsibilities will fail to capture many of the considerations all subjects regard as most important.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baumrind, D. (1986). Sex differences in moral reasoning: Response to Walker's (1984) conclusion that there are none.Child Develop. 57: 511–521.
Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, M. R., and Tarule, J. M. (1986).Women's Ways of Knowing. Basic Books, New York.
Bussey, K., and Maughan, B. (1982). Gender differences in moral reasoning.J. Personal. Social Psychol. 42: 701–706.
Clinchy, B., and Zimmerman, C. (1982). Epistemology and agency in the development of undergraduate women. In Perun, P. (ed.),The Undergraduate Woman: Issues in Educational Equity. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
Colby, A., Kohlberg, L., Gibbs, J., and Liberman, M. (1983). A longitudinal study, of moral judgement.Monogr. Res. Child Develop. 48: (1, Serial No. 200).
Ford, M. R., and Lowery, C. R. (1986). Gender differences in moral reasoning: A comparison of the justice and care orientations.J. Personal. Social Psychol. 50: 777–783.
Galotti, K. M., and Kozberg, S. F. (1987). Older adolescents' thinking about academic/vocational and interpersonal commitments.J. Youth Adoles. 16: 313–330.
Gilligan, C. (1977). In a difference voice.Harvard Educat. Rev. 47: 481–517.
Gilligan, C. (1982).In a Difference Voice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Gilligan, C., and Belenky, M. F. (1980). A naturalistic student of abortion decisions. In Selman, R. L., and Yando, R. (eds.),New Directions for Child Development: Clinical Developmental Psychology (No. 7). Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
Hanson, R. A., and Mullis, R. L. (1985). Age and gender differences in empathy and moral reasoning among adolescents.Child Study J. 15: 181–188.
Hoffman, M. L. (1975). Sex differences in moral internalization.J. Personal. Social Psychol. 32: 720–729.
Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach. In Lickona, T. (ed.),Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research and Social Issues. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Kohlberg, L. (1984).Essays in Moral Development. Volume II: The Psychology of Moral Development. Harper & Row, San Francisco.
Kohlberg, L., Levine, C., and Hewer, A. (1983).Moral Stages: A Current Formulation and a Resonse to Critics. S. Karger, Basel.
Lyons, N. P. (1983). Two perspectives: On self, relationships, and morality.Harvard Educat. Rev. 53: 125–145.
Perry, W. G., Jr. (1970).Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Rest, J. R. (1979).Development in Judging Moral Issues. Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Scheidel, D. G., and Marcia, J. E. (1985). Ego identity, intimacy, sex role role orientation, and gender.Develop. Psychol. 21: 149–160.
Sigelman, C. K., Sigelman, L., and Goodlette, M. (1984). Sex differences in the moral values of college students and their parents.Sex Roles 10: 877–883.
Walker, L. J. (1984). Sex differences in the development of moral reasoning: A critical review.Child Develop. 55: 677–691.
Walker, L. J. (1986a). Sex differences in the development of moral reasoning: A rejoinder to Baumrind.Child Develop. 57: 522–526.
Walker, L. J. (1986b). Experiential and cognitive sources of moral development in adulthood.Human Develop. 29: 113–124.
Walker, L. J., de Vries, B., and Trevethan, S. D. (1987). Moral stages and moral orientations in real-life and hypothetical dilemmas.Child Develop. 58: 842–858.
Yussen, S. R. (1977). Characteristics of moral dilemmas written by adolescents.Develop. Psychol. 13: 162–163.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received Ph.D. in Psychology and M.S.E. in Computer and Information Sciences from the University of Pennsylvania, and has research interests in the areas of formal and everyday reasoning, and the development of reasoning skills.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Galotti, K.M. Gender differences in self-reported moral reasoning: A review and new evidence. J Youth Adolescence 18, 475–488 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02132782
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02132782