Skip to main content
Log in

Gender differences in self-reported moral reasoning: A review and new evidence

  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sixty-four undergraduates wrote responses to the question, “When faced with a moral dilemma, what issues or concerns influence your decision?” The responses were coded according to one or more of 13 themes by independent raters blind to the subjects' gender. Six of the themes were identified as “feminine” themes and seven as “masculine” themes on the basis of previous work by Gilligan ([1982],In a Different Voice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts), Kohlberg ([1976], “Moral Stages and Moralization: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach,” in Lickona, T. [ed.],Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research, and social Issues, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York), and others. Only one association between gender and the presence of any given theme reached statistical significance: Thus, there is little evidence to support the idea that men and women differ in their reports of how they think about moral dilemmas. For all subjects, the average proportion of possible feminine themes in a response was higher than the proportion of possible masculine themes. This finding supports the idea than an exclusive focus on themes such as rights and responsibilities will fail to capture many of the considerations all subjects regard as most important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumrind, D. (1986). Sex differences in moral reasoning: Response to Walker's (1984) conclusion that there are none.Child Develop. 57: 511–521.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, M. R., and Tarule, J. M. (1986).Women's Ways of Knowing. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bussey, K., and Maughan, B. (1982). Gender differences in moral reasoning.J. Personal. Social Psychol. 42: 701–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinchy, B., and Zimmerman, C. (1982). Epistemology and agency in the development of undergraduate women. In Perun, P. (ed.),The Undergraduate Woman: Issues in Educational Equity. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby, A., Kohlberg, L., Gibbs, J., and Liberman, M. (1983). A longitudinal study, of moral judgement.Monogr. Res. Child Develop. 48: (1, Serial No. 200).

  • Ford, M. R., and Lowery, C. R. (1986). Gender differences in moral reasoning: A comparison of the justice and care orientations.J. Personal. Social Psychol. 50: 777–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galotti, K. M., and Kozberg, S. F. (1987). Older adolescents' thinking about academic/vocational and interpersonal commitments.J. Youth Adoles. 16: 313–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1977). In a difference voice.Harvard Educat. Rev. 47: 481–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982).In a Difference Voice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C., and Belenky, M. F. (1980). A naturalistic student of abortion decisions. In Selman, R. L., and Yando, R. (eds.),New Directions for Child Development: Clinical Developmental Psychology (No. 7). Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. A., and Mullis, R. L. (1985). Age and gender differences in empathy and moral reasoning among adolescents.Child Study J. 15: 181–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1975). Sex differences in moral internalization.J. Personal. Social Psychol. 32: 720–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach. In Lickona, T. (ed.),Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research and Social Issues. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1984).Essays in Moral Development. Volume II: The Psychology of Moral Development. Harper & Row, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L., Levine, C., and Hewer, A. (1983).Moral Stages: A Current Formulation and a Resonse to Critics. S. Karger, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, N. P. (1983). Two perspectives: On self, relationships, and morality.Harvard Educat. Rev. 53: 125–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W. G., Jr. (1970).Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R. (1979).Development in Judging Moral Issues. Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheidel, D. G., and Marcia, J. E. (1985). Ego identity, intimacy, sex role role orientation, and gender.Develop. Psychol. 21: 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigelman, C. K., Sigelman, L., and Goodlette, M. (1984). Sex differences in the moral values of college students and their parents.Sex Roles 10: 877–883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. J. (1984). Sex differences in the development of moral reasoning: A critical review.Child Develop. 55: 677–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. J. (1986a). Sex differences in the development of moral reasoning: A rejoinder to Baumrind.Child Develop. 57: 522–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. J. (1986b). Experiential and cognitive sources of moral development in adulthood.Human Develop. 29: 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. J., de Vries, B., and Trevethan, S. D. (1987). Moral stages and moral orientations in real-life and hypothetical dilemmas.Child Develop. 58: 842–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yussen, S. R. (1977). Characteristics of moral dilemmas written by adolescents.Develop. Psychol. 13: 162–163.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received Ph.D. in Psychology and M.S.E. in Computer and Information Sciences from the University of Pennsylvania, and has research interests in the areas of formal and everyday reasoning, and the development of reasoning skills.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galotti, K.M. Gender differences in self-reported moral reasoning: A review and new evidence. J Youth Adolescence 18, 475–488 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02132782

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02132782

Keywords

Navigation