Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of nasopharyngeal aspirates and throat swab specimens in a polymerase chain reaction-based test forMycoplasma pneumoniae

  • Notes
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nasopharyngeal aspirates and throat swab specimens were compared in a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based test forMycoplasma pneumoniae. The pathogen was detected in 50 % and 45 % of throat swab specimens and aspirates, respectively. However, in specimens negative forMycoplasma pneumoniae by PCR, amplification inhibitors were detected in 0 % and 36 % of throat specimens and aspirates, respectively. Further investigations confirmed that no throat specimens, but one-quarter of aspirates, are likely to be rejected for containing inadequate respiratory material or excess amplification inhibitors. Because rejection of most of the unsuitable specimens is possible only after PCR, the use of aspirates is less cost-effective. This, and the reluctance to subject patients to aspiration, make the aspirate an inferior specimen for detection ofMycoplasma pneumoniae by PCR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kok TW, Varkanis G, Marmion BP, Martin J, Esterman A: Laboratory diagnosis ofMycoplasma pneumoniae infection. 1. Direct detection of antigen in respiratory exudates by enzyme immunoassay. Epidemiology and Infection 1988, 101: 669–684.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, 1989, Book 3, Appendix E10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buck GE, O'Hara LC, Summersgill JT: Rapid, sensitive detection ofMycoplasma pneumoniae in simulated clinical specimens by DNA amplification. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1992, 30: 3280–3283.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bevan IS, Daw RA, Day PJR, Ala FA, Walker MR: Polymerase chain reaction for detection of human cytomegalovirus infection in a blood donor population. British Journal of Haematology 1991, 78: 94–99.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kwok S, Higuchi R: Avoiding false positives with PCR. Nature 1989, 339: 237–238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Skakni L, Sardet A, Just J, Landman-Parker J, Costil J, Moniot-Ville N, Bricout F, Garbarg-Chenon A: Detection ofMycoplasma pneumoniae in clinical samples from pediatric patients by polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1992, 30: 2638–2643.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Luneberg E, Jensen JS, Frosch M: Detection ofMycoplasma pneumoniae by polymerase chain reaction and nonradioactive hybridization in microtiter plates. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993, 31: 1088–1094.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tjhie JH, van Kuppeveld FJM, Roosendaal R, Melchers WJG, Gordijn R, MacLaren DM, Walboomers JMM, Meijer CJLM, van den Brule AJC: Direct PCR enables detection ofMycoplasma pneumoniae in patients with respiratory tract infections. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1994, 32: 11–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reznikov, M., Blackmore, T.K., Finlay-Jones, J.J. et al. Comparison of nasopharyngeal aspirates and throat swab specimens in a polymerase chain reaction-based test forMycoplasma pneumoniae . Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 14, 58–61 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02112622

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02112622

Keywords

Navigation