Skip to main content
Log in

Transference and countertransference reactions in the psychotherapy of pathological gamblers

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditionally, in psychodynamic forms of treatment, the patient's relationship with the therapist is central to eliciting and exploring the patient's characteristic ways of thinking, feeling and behaving. Research has increasingly demonstrated the significance of the therapeutic relationship to the treatment outcome. Since little has been written about the therapist-patient relationship in the treatment of pathological gambling, we shall describe what we have found to be some of the common and problematic transference and countertransference reactions and interactions. Both positive and negative transferences and countertransferences will be discussed not only as obstacles to successful therapy, but as tools for understanding patients' conflicts, defenses and reasons for gambling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Custer, R.L. & Milt, H. (1985).When luck runs out. New York: Facts on File.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derby, K. (1992). Some difficulties in the treatment of character-disordered addicts. In B.C. Wallace (Ed.),The chemically dependent: Phases of treatment and recovery (pp. 115–124). NewYork: Brunner/Mazel, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, S.T., Budney, A.J., Bickel, W.K., Hughes, J.R., Foerg, F., & Badger, G. (1993). Achieving cocaine abstinence with a behavioral approach.American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 763–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, A.O. & Luborsky, L. (1993). The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 561–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imhoff, J.E. (1991). Countertransference issues in the treatment of drug and alcohol addiction. In N.S. Miller (Ed.),Drug and Alcohol Addiction (pp. 931–946). New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D.F. (1989). A general theory of addictions: Rationale and evidence supporting a new approach for understanding and treating addictive behaviors. In H.J. Shaffer, S.A. Stein, D. Gambino & T.N. Cummings (Eds.),Compulsive gambling: Theory, research and practice (pp. 35–64). Lexington, D.C. Heath & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, E. (1989). The psychotherapy of dually diagnosed patients.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 6, 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, E.R. (1992). Countertransference and other mutually interactive aspects of psychotherapy with substance abusers.American Journal on Addictions, 1, 185–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg, O.F. (1984).Severe personality disorders: Psychotherapeutic strategies. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khantzian, E., Halliday, K.S., & McAuliffe, W.E. (1990).Addiction and the vulnerable self. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1971).The analysis of the self. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krystal, H. (1978). Self-representation and the capacity for self-care.Annual Psychoanalysis, 6, 209–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinsley, D.B. (1989).Developmental pathogenesis and treatment of borderline and narcissistic personalities. Northvale, New Jersey: Jason Aronson, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R.J. (1986). The pathological gambler's system for self-deception.Journal of Gambling Behavior, 2, 108–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R.J. & Rugle, L.J. (this issue). A psychodynamic approach to the addictive state of mind of the pathological gambler.Journal of Gambling Studies, 10, 21–42.

  • Rothschild, D.E. (1992). Treating the substance abuser: Psychotherapy throughout the recovery process. In B.C. Wallace (Ed.),The chemically dependent: Phases of treatment and recovery (pp. 82–91). New York: Brunner/Mazel, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugle, L.J. (1993). Initial thoughts on viewing pathological gambling from a physiological and intrapsychic perspective.Journal of Gambling Studies, 9, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H.J. (in press). Denial, ambivalence and countertransference hate. In J.D. Levin & R. Weiss (Eds.),Alcoholism: dynamics and treatment. Northdale, New Jersey: Jason Aronson, Inc.

  • Steinberg, M. (1993). Couples treatment issues for recovering male compulsive gamblers and their partners.Journal of Gambling Studies, 9, 153–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taber, J.I. (1983, February).Common characteristics of pathological gamblers and some interventions which seem to help. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Convention of Divisions 23 and 26 of the American Psychological Association, White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia.

  • Taber, J.I. & Chaplin, M.P. (1988). Group psychotherapy with pathological gamblers.Journal of Gambling Behavior, 4, 183–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurmser, L. (1992). Psychology of compulsive drug use. In B.C. Wallace (Ed.),The chemically dependent: Phases of treatment and recovery (pp. 92–114). New York: Brunner/Mazel, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalisove, D.L. (1992). Survey of contemporary psychoanalytically oriented clinicians on the treatment of addictions: A synthesis. In B.C. Wallace (Ed.),The chemically dependent: Phases of treatment and recovery (pp. 61–81). New York: Brunner/Mazel, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rugle, L.J., Rosenthal, R.J. Transference and countertransference reactions in the psychotherapy of pathological gamblers. J Gambling Stud 10, 43–65 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02109778

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02109778

Keywords

Navigation