Skip to main content
Log in

Constraints on inflationary solutions in the presence of shear and bulk viscosity

  • Published:
General Relativity and Gravitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inflationary models and their claim to solve many of the outstanding problems in cosmology have been the subject of a great deal of debate over the last few years. A major sticking point has been the lack of both good observational and theoretical arguments to single out one particular model out of the many that solve these problems. Here we examine the degree of restrictiveness on the dynamical relationship between the cosmological scale factor and the inflation driving self-interaction potential of a minimally coupled scalar field, imposed by the condition that the scalar field is required to be real during a classical regime (the reality condition). We systematically look at the effects of this constraint on many of the inflationary models found in the literature within the FLRW framework, and also look at what happens when physically motivated perturbations such as shear and bulk viscosity are introduced. We find that in many cases, either the models are totally excluded or the reality condition gives rise to constraints on the scale factor and on the various parameters of the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barrow, J. D. (1988).Nucl. Phys. B 310, 743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrow, J. D. (1990).Phys. Lett. 235B, 40.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Coley, A. A., and Tavakol, R. K. (1992).Gen. Rel. Grav. 24, 835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eckart, C. (1940).Phys. Rev. 58, 919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ellis, G. F. R., and MacCallum, M. A. H. (1969).Commun. Math. Phys. 12, 108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ellis, G. F. R. (1973). InCargèse Lectures in Physics, 6, E. Schatzman, ed. (Gordon and Breach, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ellis, G. F. R. (1991). InGravitation. Proc. Banff Summer Institute, R. Mann and P. Wesson, eds. (World Scientific, Singapore).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ellis, G. F. R., and Madsen, M. S. (1991)Class. Quant. Grav. 8, 667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ellis, G. F. R., Skea, J. E. F., and Tavakol, R. K. (1991).Europhys. Lett. 16, 767.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guth, A. H. (1981).Phys. Rev. D 23, 347.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Israel, W. (1976).Ann. Phys. (NY) 100, 310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lucchin, F., and Matarrese, S. (1985).Phys. Rev. D 32, 1316.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lucchin, F., and Matarrese, S. (1985).Phys. Lett. 164B, 282.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Madsen, M. S. (1988)Class. Quant. Grav. 5, 627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shafi, Q., and Wetterich, C. (1985).Phys. Lett. 152B, 51.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Elst, H., Dunsby, P.K.S. & Tavakol, R. Constraints on inflationary solutions in the presence of shear and bulk viscosity. Gen Relat Gravit 27, 171–191 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02107957

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02107957

Keywords

Navigation