Abstract
Bone density predicts the risk of hip fracture. Because hip strength is determined by bone geometry and architecture as well as density, we tested which variables in geometry and architecture were independent discriminators of hip fracture and, if combined with density, improved the discrimination of fracture from non-fracture over bone density alone. The design was a case-control study. The subjects were Caucasian women over the age of 60 years who had sustained a hip fracture after the age of 58 years (n=22), and controls matched for age and weight (n=43) and unmatched controls (n=317) with no history of hip fracture. Variables in density, geometry and architecture were obtained from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry images and from radiographs of the upper end of the femur. In a univariate model, of the measures of bone mass, the best discriminator of hip fracture was bone mineral density of the neck of femur; of the geometric measurements, it was hip axis length; and of the measurements of bone architecture, it was Singh grade. In a multivariate model, these three variables were shown to be independent discriminators of hip facture. When hip axis length was combined with bone mineral density, there was significant improvement in discrimination of hip fracture (p=0.014), and when Singh grade was combined with hip axis length and bone mineral density there was a further significant improvement (p=0.002). In logistic regression models using hip axis length and Singh grade adjusted for femoral neck bone mineral density, age and weight, the area under the receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve for femoral neck density, hip axis length and Singh grade together was significantly greater than for femoral neck density alone (p=0.006). Models that combine bone mass (density), geometry (hip axis length) and architecture (Singh grade) significantly improve the discrimination of hip fracture over bone density by itself. If these models can be shown to be equally useful in predicting hip fracture prospectively and can be obtained from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, their use will increase the ability to identify subjects at most risk of hip fracture.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Melton LJ III, O'Fallon WM, Riggs BL. Secular trends in the incidence of hip fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 1987;41:57–64.
Cummings SR, Black DM, Rubin SM. Lifetime risks of hip, Colles' or vertebral fracture, and coronary heart disease among white postmenopausal women. Arch Intern Med 1989;149:2445–8.
Sernbo I, Johnell O. Consequences of a hip fracture: a prospective study over 1 year. Osteoporosis Int 1993;3:148–53.
Campion EW, Jette AM, Clearly PD, Harris BA. Hip fractures: a prospective study of hospital course, complications, and costs. J Gen Intern Med 1987;2:78–82.
Jette AM, Harris BE, Cleary PD, Campion EW. Functional recovery after hip fracture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987;68:735–40.
Cooper C, Atkinson FJ, Jacobsen SJ, O'Fallon WM, Melton LJ III: Population-based study of survival after osteoporotic fractures. Am J Epidemiol 1993;137:1001–5.
Jacobsen SJ, Goldberg J, Miles TP, Brody JA, Stiers W, Rimm AA. Race and sex differences in mortality following fracture of the hip. Am J Public Health 1992;82:1147–50.
Magaziner J, Simonsick EM, Kashner TM, Hebel JR, Kenzora JE. Survival experience of aged hip fracture patients. Am J Public Health 1989;79:274–8.
Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ III Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection Osteoporosis Int 1992;2:285–9.
Grisso JA, Kelsey JL, Strom BL, et al.. Risk factors for falls as a cause of hip fracture in women. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1326–31.
Hayes WC, Myers ER, Morris JN, Gerhart TN, Yett HS, Lipsitz LA. Impact near the hip dominates fracture risk in elderly nursing home residents who fall. Calcif Tissue Int 1993;52:192–8.
Mazess RB, Barden H, Ettinger M, Schultz E. Bone density of the radius, spine, and proximal femur in osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 1988;3:13–8.
Chevalley T, Rizzoli R, Nydegger V, et al. Preferential low mineral density of the femoral neck in patients with a recent fracture of the proximal femur. Osteoporosis Int 1991;1:147–54.
Aloia JF, McGowan D, Erens E, Miele G. Hip fracture patients have generalized osteopenia with a preferential deficit in the femur. Osteoporosis Int 1992;2:88–93.
Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, et al. Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. Lancet 1993;341:72–5.
Melton LJ III, Atkinson EJ, O'Fallon WM, Wahner HW, Riggs BL. Long-term fracture prediction by bone mineral assessed at different skeletal sites. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:1227–33.
Horsman A, Nordin BEC, Simpson M, Speed R. Cortical and trabecular bone status in elderly women with femoral neck fracture. Clin Orthop 1982;166:143–51.
Cooper C, Barker DJP, Morris J, Briggs RSJ. Osteoporosis, falls, and age in fracture of the proximal femur. BMJ 1987;295:13–5.
Glüer CC, Cummings SR, Pressman A, et al. Prediction of hip fractures from pelvic radiographs: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 1994;9:671–7.
Faulkner KG, Cummings SR, Black D, Palermo L, Glüer CC, Genant HK. Simple measurement of femoral geometry predicts hip fracture: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:1211–7.
Cody DD, Nahigian KK, Jamison JA, Divine GW, Windham JP. Bone density and bone geometry: fractors in hip fracture risk? [abstract] J Bone Miner Res 1993;8(Suppl 1):S355.
Singh M, Nagrath AR, Maini PS, Haryana R. Changes in trabecular pattern of the upper end of the femur as an index of osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1970;52:457–67.
Singh M, Riggs B, Beabout J, Jowsey J. Femoral trabecular-pattern index for evaluation of spinal osteoporosis. Ann Intern Med 1972;77:63–7.
Yoshikawa T, Turner CH, Peacock M, et al. Geometric structure of the femoral neck measured using DXA. J Bone Miner Res 1994;9:1053–64.
Breslow NE, Day NE. Statistical methods in cancer research, vol 1, The analysis of case-controlled studies. Switzerland International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization, 1980.
Cooper C, Barker DJP, Hall AJ. Evaluation of the Singh index and femoral calcar width as epidemiological methods for measuring bone mass in the femoral neck. Clin Radiol 1986;37:123–5.
Pogrund H, Rigal WH, Making M, Robin G, Menczel J, Steinberg R. Determination of osteoporosis in patients with fractured femoral neck using the Singh index. Clin Orthop 1981;156:189–95.
Nakamura T, Turner CH, Yoshikawa T, et al. Do variations in hip geometry explain differences in hip fracture risk between Japanese and Americans? J Bone Miner Res 1994;9:1071–6.
Faulkner KG, McClung M, Cummings SR. Automated evaluation of his axis length for predicting hip fracture. J Bone Miner Res 1994;9:1065–70.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peacock, M., Turner, C.H., Liu, G. et al. Better discrimination of hip fracture using bone density, geometry and architecture. Osteoporosis Int 5, 167–173 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02106096
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02106096