Skip to main content
Log in

Excision of the rectum with colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the low and mid rectum

  • World Progress In Surgery
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The results of rectal excision with colonic pouch-anal anastomosis are reviewed from a series of 162 patients covering 7 years. All patients have been operated upon in the same institution and consecutively. The follow-up is now sufficient to allow an accurate evaluation of the outcome of the patients. The main goal of this study was to provide a detailed report of the functional results. Continence was satisfactory in 96% of the patients, with either a perfect continence or minor troubles that would not have been detectable other than by a rigorous questioning. The mean number of bowel movements was 2 per 24 hours. Fragmentation of the defecation and urgency were absent. Twenty-five per cent of the patients had to elicit the evacuation of the reservoir with a suppository or an enema. Improvement of function yielded by a reservoir over straight colo-anal and low colo-rectal anastomoses are significant and, as suggested by manometric studies, are directly related to the restoration of a reservoir function.

Résumé

Les résultats fonctionnels d'une série de 162 patients consécutifs, opérés pour cancer rectal dans le même service pendant une période de 7 ans, sont présentés. Tous ces patients ont eu une résection rectale suivie d'une anastomose coloanale avec résevoir. La continence était jugée satisfaisante (continence parfaite ou troubles mineurs passant inapercus en dehors d'un interrogatoire poussé) chez 96% des patients. Le nombre moyen de selles par 24 heures était de deux. Aucun patient ne s'est plaint de fragmentation de selles ou de besoins impérieux. Vingt pour-cent des patients éprouvaient le besoin de provoquer l'évacuation de leur résevoir soit par un suppositoire, soit par un lavement. L'amélioration de la continence par l'anastomose colo-anale avec résevoir, par rapport à l'anastomose colo-anale sans résevoir ou par rapport à une anastomose colorectale basse, est nette et semble être directement en rapport avec la création de ce résevoir.

Resumen

Se revisan los resultados de la resección rectal con anastomosis colónica a bolsa anal en una serie de 162 pacientes en el curso de siete años. Todos los pacientes fueron operados en la misma institución y en forma consecutiva. El período de seguimiento ya es suficiente para permitir una evaluación certera de los resultados en tales pacientes. El propósito principal de este estudio fué el de proveer un reporte detallado de los resultados funcionales. La continencia anal apareció satisfactoria en 96% de los pacientes, con continencia perfecta o con problemas menores que no habrían sido detectables sino bajo interrogatorio riguroso. El número promedio de defecaciones fué de 2/24 horas. No se observaron fragmentación de la defecación ni sensación de urgencia. Veinticinco por ciento de los pacientes tuvo que provocar la evacuación del reservorio mediante un supositorio o un enema. Es significativa la mejoría de la función que provee un reservorio en comparación con la anastomosis directa colo-anal o con las anastomosis colo-rectales bajas, y según lo sugieren estudios manométricos está directamente relacionada con la restauración de función de reservorio.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parc, R., Tiret, E., Frileux, P., Moszkowski, E., Loygue, J.: Resection and coloanal anastomosis with colonic reservoir for rectal carcinoma. Br. J. Surg.73:139, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aster, V., Coller, F.A.: The prognostic significance of distension of carcinoma of colon and rectum. Ann. Surg.139:846, 1954

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pollett, W.G., Nicholls, R.J.: The relationship between the extent of distal clearance and survival and local recurrence rates after curative anterior resection for carcinoma of the rectum. Ann. Surg.198:159, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Williams, N.S., Dixon, M.F., Johnston, D.: Reppraisal of the 5 centimetre rule of distal excision for carcinoma of the rectum: A study of distal intramural spread and of patients survival. Br. J. Surg.70:150, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Williams, N.S., Johnston, D.: Survival and recurrence after sphincter saving resection and abdomino-perineal resection for carcinoma of the middle third of the rectum. Br. J. Surg.71:278, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goligher, J.C.: Current trends in the use of sphincter-saving excision in the treatment of carcinoma of the rectum. Cancer50:2627, 1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Localio, S.A., Eng, K., Coppa, G.F.: Abdomino sacral resection for midrectal cancer: A fifteen year experience. Ann. Surg.198:320, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mason, A.Y.: Transphincteric approach to rectal lesions. Surg. Ann.9:171, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  9. Babcok, W.W.: Operative treatment of carcinoma of the rectosigmoid. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet.55:627, 1932

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cugnenc, P.H., Grassin, P., Parc, R., Loygue, J.: Place et resultats de l'operation de Babcock dans le traitement du cancer du rectum. J. Chir.118:121, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lazorthes, F., Fages, P., Chiotasso, P., Lemozy, J., Blomm, E.: Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum. Br. J. Surg.73:136, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Parks, A.G., Percy, J.P.: Resection and sutured colo-anal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Br. J. Surg.69:301, 1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bernard, D., Morgan, S., Tasse, D., Wassef, R.: Preliminary results of colo anal anastomosis. Dis. Colon Rectum32:580, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Richelme, M., Benchimol, D., Mouroux, J., Leroux, Y., Bernard, J.L., Bereder, J.M., Bourgeon, A., Pulcini, A., Cordero, C.: Place de la colo protectomie avec anastomose colo-anale dans le traitement du cancer du rectum. Chir.116:150, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  15. Parc, R., Berger, A., Tiret, E., Frileux, P., Nordlinger, B., Hannoun, L.: Anastomose colo-anale avec réservoir dans le traitement du cancer du rectum. Ann. Gastro-Enterol. Hepatol.23:329, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  16. Enker, W.E., Stearns, M.W., Janov, A.J.: Per anal colo anal anastomosis following low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Dis. Colon Rectum28:576, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Drake, D.B., Pemberton, J.H., Beart, R. W., Dozoix, R.R., Wolff, B.G.: Colo anal anastomosis in the management of benign and malignant rectal disease. Ann. Surg.206:600, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Berger, A., Tiret, E., Frileux, P., Cugnenc, P.H., Norlinger, B., Hannoun, L., Parc, R.: Impact de la radiothérapie post-opératoire sur le résultat fonctionnel de l'anastomose colo-anale. Lyon Chir. (in press)

  19. Lazorthes, F., Fages, P., Chiotasso, P., Bugat, R.: Synchronous abdomino trans-sphincteric resection of low rectal cancer: New technique for direct colo-anal anastomosis. Br. J. Surg.73:573, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nicholls, R.J., Lubowski, D.Z., Donaldson, D.R.: Comparison of colonic reservoir and straight colo-anal reconstruction after rectal excision. Br. J. Surg.75:318, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fazio, V.W., Jagelman, D.J., Lavery, I.C., McConagle, B.A.: Evaluation of the proximale ILS circular stapler: A prospective study. Ann. Surg.201:108, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hautefeuille, P., Valleur, P., Perniceni, T., Martin, B., Galian, A., Cherqui, D., Hoang, C.: Functional and oncologic results after colo anal anastomosis for low rectal carcinoma. Ann. Surg.207:61, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Neville, R., Fielding, L.P., Amendoza, C.: Local tumor recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer: A ten review hospital. Dis. Colon Rectum30:12, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Heald, R.J., Ryall, R.D.H.: Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet1:1479, 1986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Heald, R.J., Husband, E.M., Ryall, R.D.H.: The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery: The clue to pelvic recurrence? Br. J. Surg.69:613, 1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mac Donald, P.J., Heald, R.J.: A survey of anastomosis with circular stapling devices. Br. J. Surg.70:727, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Keighley, M.R.B., Matheson, D.: Functional results of rectal excision and endo-anal anastomosis. Br. J. Surg.67:757, 1980

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pappalardo, G., Toccaceli, S., Dionisio, P., Castrini, G., Ravo, B.: Preoperative and postoperative evaluation by manometric study of the anal sphincter after colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma. Dis. Colon Rectum31:119, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Vernava, A.M., Robbins, P.L., Brabbee, G.W.: Colo-anal anastomosis for benign and malignant disease. Dis. Colon Rectum32:690, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chiotasso, P., Lazorthes, F., Fages, P., Roques, J., Chevreau, P.: Anastomose coloanale sur reservoir pour cancer du rectum. Lyon Chir.86:201, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  31. Suzuki, H., Matsumoto, K., Amano, S., Fujioka, M., Honzumi, M.: Ano rectal pressure and rectal compliance after low anterior resection. Br. J. Surg.67:655, 1980

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berger, A., Tiret, E., Parc, R. et al. Excision of the rectum with colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the low and mid rectum. World J. Surg. 16, 470–477 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02104450

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02104450

Keywords

Navigation