Skip to main content
Log in

A study at 10 medical centers of the safety and efficacy of 48 flexible sigmoidoscopies and 8 colonoscopies during pregnancy with follow-up of fetal outcome and with comparison to control groups

  • Diagnostic And Interventional Techniques
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To analyze the risks versus benefits of flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy to the pregnant female and fetus, we conducted a multiyear, retrospective study at 10 hospitals of 46 patients undergoing 48 sigmoidoscopies and 8 patients undergoing 8 colonoscopies during pregnancy. Sigmoidoscopy controls included two study control groups and the average American pregnancy outcomes. Sigmoidoscopy indications included hematochezia in 28, diarrhea in 10, abdominal pain in 4, and other in 3. Thirteen patients were in the first trimester of pregnancy, 18 were in the second trimester, and 15 were in the third trimester. Twenty-seven patients had a lesion diagnosed by sigmoidoscopy, including reactivated or newly diagnosed inflammatory bowel disease, bleeding internal hemorrhoids, and other colitidies. Twenty-two of 29 patients with rectal bleeding had a significant lesion identified by sigmoidoscopy. Sigmoidoscopy was significantly more frequently diagnostic for hematochezia than for other indications (p < 0.03, χ2). No endoscopic complications occurred to the pregnant patients. Excluding 4 voluntary abortions and 1 unknown pregnancy outcome, 38 (93%) of 41 pregnant females delivered healthy babies (study control rate=93%; NS, Fisher's exact test). Mean live-born infant Apgar scores were 8.2 ± 1.5 (SD) at 1 min and 9.0 ± 0.2 at 5 min (control mean Apgar scores: 8.1 ± 1.7 at 1 min and 8.8 ± 1.0 at 5 min; NS, Student'st test). Three high-risk pregnancies ended with fetal demise at 8, 9, or 12 weeks after sigmoidoscopy, from causes unrelated to sigmoidoscopy. No fetal cardiac abnormalities were detected by fetal cardiac monitoring during two sigmoidoscopies. Eight pregnant females underwent colonoscopy, without complications. Pregnancy outcomes included six healthy babies delivered at full term, one voluntary abortion, and one fetal demise in a high-risk pregnancy 4 months after colonoscopy from causes unrelated to colonoscopy. This study suggests that sigmoidoscopy does not induce labor or result in congenital malformations, that sigmoidoscopy is not contraindicated during pregnancy, and that sigmoidoscopy may be beneficial in pregnant patients with significant lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Colonoscopy during pregnancy should be considered for life-threatening lower gastrointestinal bleeding or when the only alternative is surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cappell MS, Colon VJ, Sidhom OA: A multicenter study of the safety and efficacy of flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy during pregnancy in 39 females with follow-up of fetal outcome (abstract). Gastroenterology 108(4; Suppl):A276, 1995

  2. Hunter JG: Endoscopic laser applications in the gastrointestinal tract. Surg Clin North Am 69:1147–1166, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Arrowsmith JB, Gerstman BB, Fleischer DE, Benjamin SB: Results from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy/U.S. Food and Drug Administration collaborative study on complication rates and drug use during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 37:421–427, 1991

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Eimiller A: Complication in endoscopy. Endoscopy 24:176–184, 1992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hart R, Classen M: Complications of diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 22:229–233, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Alvarado CJ, Stolz MS, Maki DG, Fraser V, Jones M, O'Rourke S, Wallace RJ Jr: Nosocomial infection and pseudoinfection from contaminated endoscopes and bronchoscopes: Wisconsin and Missouri. JAMA 266:2197–2198, 1991

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rankin GB: Indications, contraindications, and complications of colonoscopy.In MV Sivak Jr (ed). Gastroenterologic Endoscopy, Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1987, pp 868–880

    Google Scholar 

  8. Waye JD, Lewis BS, Yessayan S: Colonoscopy: A prospective report of complications. J Clin Gastroenterol 15:347–351, 1992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. National Center for Health Statistics, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Vital Statistics of the United States 1989, Vol. I. Natality. Washington, DC, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brent RL: The effect of embryonic and fetal exposure to x-ray, microwaves, and ultrasound: Counseling the pregnant and nonpregnant patient about these risks. Semin Oncol 16:347–368, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alstead EM, Ritchie JK, Lennard-Jones JE,et al. Safety of azathioprine in pregnancy in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 99:443–446, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Connon J: Gastrointestinal complications.In Medical Complications During Pregnancy, GN Burrow, TF Ferris (eds). Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1988, pp 303–317

    Google Scholar 

  13. Saunders P, Milton PJD: Laparotomy during pregnancy: An assessment of diagnostic accuracy and fetal wastage. Br Med J 3:165–167, 1973

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tamir IL, Bongard FS, Klein SR: Acute appendicitis in the pregnant patient. Am J Surg 160:571–576, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cappell MS, Sidhom OA: A multicenter, multiyear study of the safety and clinical utility of flexible sigmoidoscopy in 24 consecutive pregnant females with follow-up of fetal outcome. Dig Dis Sci 40:472–479, 1995

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cappell MS, Sidhom O: A multicenter, multiyear study of the safety and clinical utility of esophagogastroduodenoscopy in 20 consecutive pregnant females with follow-up of fetal outcome. Am J Gastroenterol 88:1900–1905, 1993

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cappell MS, Sidhom OA, Colon V: A study at eight medical centers of the safety and clinical efficacy of esophagogastroduodenoscopy in 83 pregnant females with follow-up of fetal outcome and with comparison to control groups. Am J Gastroenterol 91:348–354, 1996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. National Center for Health Statistics, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Health United States 1992 and Healthy People 2000 Program. Hyattsville, MD, Public Health Service, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rubin PH, Janowitz HD: The digestive tract and pregnancy.In Complications of Pregnancy: Medical, Surgical, Gynecologic, Psychosocial, and Perinatal, 4th ed SH Cherry, IR Merkatz (eds). Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1991, pp 780–796

    Google Scholar 

  20. Singer AJ, Brandt LJ: Pathophysiology of the gastrointestinal tract during pregnancy. Am J Gastroenterol 86:1695–1712, 1991

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bernstein MA, Madoff RD, Caushaj PF: Colon and rectal cancer in pregnancy. Dis Colon Rectum 36:172–178, 1993

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brackbill Y, Kane J, Manniello RL, Abramson D: Obstetric meperidine usage and assessment of neonatal status. Anesthesiology 40:116–120, 1974

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Epstein H, Waxman A, Gleicher N,et al. Meperidine-induced sinusoidal fetal heart rate pattern and reversal with naloxone. Obstet Gynecol 59 (Suppl):22–25, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  24. Melmed AP: Anesthesia principles and techniques in pregnancy.In Complications of Pregnancy: Medical, Surgical, Gynecologic, Psychosocial, and Perinatal, 4th ed, SH Cherry, IR Merkatz (eds). Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1991, pp 732–764

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rosenberg L, Mitchell AA, Parsells JL, Pashayan H, Louik C, Shapiro S: Lack of relation of oral clefts to diazepam use during pregnancy. N Engl J Med 309:1282–1285, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dark DS, Campbell DR, Wesselius LJ: Arterial oxygen desaturation during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 85:1317–1321, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. McKee CC, Ragland JJ, Myers JO: An evaluation of multiple clinical variables for hypoxia during colonoscopy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 173:37–40, 1991

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hampton KK, Grant PJ, Primrose J, Dean HG, Davies JA, Prentice CR: Haemostatic responses and vasopressin release during colonoscopy in man. Clin Sci 81:257–260, 1991

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Simon IB, Lewis RJ, Satava RM. A safe method for sedating and monitoring patients for upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. Am Surg 57:219–221, 1991

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. DiSario JA, Waring JP, Talbert G, Sanowski RA: Monitoring of blood pressure and heart rate during routine endoscopy: A prospective, randomized, controlled study. Am J Gastroenterol 86:956–960, 1991

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bollaert PE, Bauer P, Judlin P, Laprevote-Heully MC, Lambert H, Larcan A: Hemorrhagic colitis withStreptococcus pyogenes preceding hemolytic uremic syndrome during early pregnancy (letter). Nephron 52:103–104, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bornman PC, Collins JS, Abrahamson MJ, Gilinsky NH: Live abdominal pregnancy presenting as massive rectal bleeding. Postgrad Med J 61:759–760, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cooksey G, Gunn A, Wotherspoon WC: Surgery for acute ulcerative colitis and toxic megacolon during pregnancy. Br J Surg 72:547, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Moeller DD: Crohn's disease beginning during pregnancy. South Med J 81:1067, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sheld HH: Megacolon complicating pregnancy: A case report. J Reprod Med 32:239–242, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Fraser JL, Eckert LA: Volvulus complicating pregnancy (letter). Can Med Assoc J 128:1045–1048, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nesbitt JC, Moise KJ, Sawyers JL: Colorectal carcinoma in pregnancy. Arch Surg 120:636–640, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Schade RR, van Thiel DH, Gavaler JS: Chronic idiopathic ulcerative colitis: Pregnancy and fetal outcome. Dig Dis Sci 29:614–619, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Salinas A, Guelrud M, Toledano A, Dreiling DA: Abdominal pregnancy causing massive lower gastrointestinal bleeding: Case report. Mt Sinai J Med 52:371–374, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Patterson SP, Frankum CE, Sexton H: Ectopic pregnancy causing massive rectal bleeding. South Med J 71:1449–1450, 1978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Frank B: Endoscopy in pregnancy.In Gastrointestinal disorders during pregnancy, Karlstadt RG, Surawicz CM, Croitoru R (eds). Annual convention handout, American College of Gastroenterology, 1994

  42. Berg JC, Miller R, Burkhalter E: Clinical value of pulse oximetry during routine diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic procedures. Endoscopy 23:328–330, 1991

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gonsoulin W, Mason B, Carpenter RJ Jr: Colon cancer in pregnancy with elevated maternal alpha-fetoprotein level at presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 163:1172–1173, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Woods JB, Martin JN Jr, Ingram FH, Odom CD, Scott-Conner CE, Rhodes RS: Pregnancy complicated by carcinoma of the colon above the rectum. Am J Perinatol 9:102–110, 1992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bashir RM, Montgomery EA, Gupta PK, Nauta RM, Crockett SA, Collea JV, Al-Kawas FH: Massive gastrointestinal hemorrhage during pregnancy caused by ectopic decidua of the terminal ileum and colon. Am J Gastroenterol 90:1325–1327, 1995

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

A preliminary version of this paper was presented orally at the Annual Convention of the American Gastroenterology Association on May 15, 1995, in San Diego, California (1).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cappell, M.S., Colon, V.J. & Sidhom, O.A. A study at 10 medical centers of the safety and efficacy of 48 flexible sigmoidoscopies and 8 colonoscopies during pregnancy with follow-up of fetal outcome and with comparison to control groups. Digest Dis Sci 41, 2353–2361 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02100127

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02100127

Key words

Navigation