Skip to main content
Log in

Implicitly defined optimization problems

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers the solution of the problem: inff[y, x(y)] s.t.y\(\bar R\)[y, x(y)] ⊆E k, wherex(y) solves: minF(x, y) s.t.xR(x, y) ⊆E n. In order to obtain local solutions, a first-order algorithm, which uses {dx(y)/dy} for solving a special case of the implicitly definedy-problem, is given. The derivative is obtained from {dx(y, r)/dy}, wherer is a penalty function parameter and {x(y, r)} are approximations to the solution of thex-problem given by a sequential minimization algorithm. Conditions are stated under whichx(y, r) and {dx(y, r)/dy} exist. The computation of {dx(y, r)/dy} requires the availability of ∇ y F(x, y) and the partial derivatives of the other functions defining the setR(x, y) with respect to the parametersy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.L. Armacost and A.V. Fiaccco, Computational experience in sensitivity analysis for nonlinear programming, Math. Progr. 6(3).

  2. R.L. Armacost and W.C. Mylander, A guide to a SUMT-version 4 computer subroutine for implementing sensitivity analysis in nonlinear programming. Technical Paper Serial T-287, The Institute for Managament Science and Engineering, The George Washington University, Washington, DC (1973).

  3. D.P. Bertsekas, Nondifferentiable optimization via approximation, Math. Progr. Study 3(1975)1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.W. Blankenship and J.E. Falk, Infinitely constrained optimization problems, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 19, 2(1976).

  5. J. Bracken and J. McGill, Mathematical programs with optimization problems in the constraints, Oper. Res. 21(1973)37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Bracken and J. McGill, A method for solving mathematical programs with nonlinear programs in the constraints, Oper. Res. 22(1974)1097–1101.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A.H. deSilva, Sensitivity formulas for nonlinear factorable programming and their application to the solution of an implicitly defined optimization problem of US crude oil production, D.Sc. Dissertation, The George Washington University, Washington, DC (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.E. Falk, private communication.

  9. A.V. Fiacco, Sensitivity analysis for nonlinear programming using penalty methods, Math. Progr. 10, 3(1976).

  10. A.V. Fiacco and G.P. McCormick,Nonlinear Programming, Sequential Unconstrained Minimization Techniques (Wiley, 1968).

  11. A. Ghaemi, A.H. deSilva and G.P. McCormick, Symbolic factorable SUMT: What is it? How is it used?, Technical Paper Serial T-402, The George Washington University, Washington, DC (May, 1979).

  12. R.H.F. Jackson, Tensors, polyads, and high-order methods in factorable programming, D.Sc. Dissertation, The George Washington University, Washington, DC (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. Kolstad and L.S. Lasdon, Derivative evaluation and computational experience with large bilevel mathematical programs, BEBR Faculty Working Paper No. 1266, College of Commerce and Business Administration, University of Illinois ((July, 1986).

  14. G.P. McCormick, Anti-zig-zagging by bending, Manag. Sci. 15(1969)315–320.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G.P. McCormick, A mini-manual for use of the SUMT computer program and the factorable programming language, Technical Report SOL 74-15, Systems Optimization Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (August 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  16. R.L. Tobin and T.L. Friesz, Sensitivity analysis for equilibrium network flow, Transport. Sci. 22(1988)242–250.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Research sponsored by National Science Foundation Grant ECS-8709795 and Office of Naval Research Contract N00014-89-J-1537. We thank the referees for constructive comments on an earlier version of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

deSilva, A.H., McCormick, G.P. Implicitly defined optimization problems. Ann Oper Res 34, 107–124 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02098175

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02098175

Keywords

Navigation