Skip to main content
Log in

Biomass and productivity of the subalpine Pinus albicaulis — Vaccinium scoparium association in Montana, USA

  • Published:
Vegetatio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Andreyashkina, N. I. & P. O. Gorchakovskii. 1972. The productivity and methods of its assessment, of shrub, dwart-shrub and herbaceous communities of the forest tundra. Ekologiya 3: 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville, G. L. 1972. Use of logarithmic regression in the estimation of plant biomass. Can. J. For. Res. 2: 49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, J. S. 1961. Forest Pathology. McGraw-Hill, N.Y. 572 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, J. J. & J. S. Olson. 1973. Corrections for bias in regression estimates after logarithmic transformation. Ecology 54: 1403–1407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun-Blanquet, J. 1964. Pflanzensoziologie. Springer-Verlag, Wien/New York. 865 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J. R. 1963. Root production and the estimation of net productivity, Can. J. Bot. 41: 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daubenmire, R. & J. B. Daubenmire. 1968. Forest vegetation of Eastern Washington and Northern Idaho. Wash. Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 60. 104 pp.

  • Day, R. J. 1966. Whitebark pine in the Rocky Mountains of Alberta. For. Chron. 43: 278–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, T. T. & B. M. G. Jones. 1974. Biomass and primary productivity of birch (Betula pubescens s. lat.) in South-West Greenland. J. Ecol. 62: 821–830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faull, J. H. 1939. A review of the extension of our knowledge of Calyptospora goeppertianum Kuehne. J. Arnold Arboretum 20: 104–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forcella, F. 1975. A nonparametric method for the detection of pattern in vegetation. Mont. Acad. Sci. Proc. 35: 38–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forcella, F. & T. Weaver. 1977. Cone crops in whitebark pine forests (in review).

  • Grier, C. C. & R. S. Logan. 1975. Biomass, productivity and nutrient distribution and cycling in a conifer forest on the Oregon Coast. Northwest Sci., Program and Abstracts, 47th Annual Meeting.

  • Grime, J. P. 1966. Shade avoidance and tolerance in flowering plants. In: R. Bainbridge, G. C. Evans & O. Rackham (eds.), Light as an Ecological Factor, pp. 281–301. Blackwell Scientif. Publ., Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handley, D. P. 1976. Tree biomass and productivity estimated for three habitat types of Northern Idaho. U. Idaho For., Wildl. and Range Exp. Stn. Bull. 14, Moscow, Idaho. 15 pp.

  • Hickman, J. C. 1976. Non-forest vegetation of the Central Western Cascade Mountains of Oregon. Northwest Sci. 50: 145–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime, J. P. & R. Hunt. 1975. Relative growth rate: its range and adaptive significance in a local flora. J. Ecol. 63: 393–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock, C. L. & A. Cronquist. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. Univ. of Washington Press, Seattle. 730 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, F. L. & P. G. Risser. 1974. Biomass, annual net primary production and dynamics of six mineral elements in a post oak-blackjack oak forest. Ecology 55: 1246–1258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, W. D. 1971. Total standing crop and three component distribution in three stands of 100 year-old lodgepole pine. In: Young, H. E. (ed.), Forest Biomass Studies. U. Maine Agric. Exp. Sta., Orono.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M. 1963. Dynamics of vegetation in relation to soil development in Northern Yatsugatake Mountains. Jap. J. Bot. 18: 255–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaspar, J. B. & T. Szabo. 1970. The physical and mechanical properties of whitebark pine. Forest Chrom. 46: 314–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kira, T. & T. Shidei. 1967. Primary production and turnover of organic matter in different forest ecosystems of the Western Pacific. Jap. J. Ecol. 17: 70–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, F. J. et al. 1970. Mechanical properties of Pinus albicaulis. Forest Chron. 46: 322–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, D. H. 1975. The potential sensitivity of various ecosystem components to winter precipitation management in the Medicine Bow Mountains, Wyoming. Dept. Bot., U. Wyoming, Laramie. 376 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis, T. D. & E. W. Mogren. 1975. Tree strata biomass of subalpine sprucefir stands in Southwestern Colorado. Forest Sci. 21: 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks, O. L. 1970. Evolution of diversity, efficiency and community stability. Amer. Zool. 10: 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madgwick, H. A. I. & T. Satoo. 1975. On estimating the above-ground weights of tree stands. Ecology 56: 1446–1450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mälkönen, E. 1975. Annual primary production and nutrient cycle in some Scots Pine stands. Comm. Inst. For. Fenn. 84: 1–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mealey, S. 1975. The natural food habits of free ranging grizzly bears in Yellowstone National Park, 1973–1974. Thesis Montana State Univ., Bozeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moir, W. H. 1972. Litter, foliage, branch and stem production in contrasting lodgepole pine habitats of the Colorado Front Range. In: Franklin, J. F., L. J. Dempster & R. Waring (eds.), Proceedings Research on Coniferous Forest Ecosystems — a Symposium, pp. 189–198. Pac. Northwest Forest and Range Exp. Sta., Portland, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peattle, D. C. 1953. A natural history of western trees. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 751 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, R. D. 1976. Land capability assessment by habitat types. In: America's Renewable Resource Potential — 1975: The turning point. Proc. 1975 Natl. Conv. Soc. Am. For., pp. 312–325.

  • Pfister, R. D., B. L. Kovalchik, S. F. Arno & R. C. Presby. 1974. Forest habitat types of Montana. USDA Forest Service. Intermtn. Forest and Range Exp. Sta. Missoula, Montana. 213 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodin, L. E. & N. I. Bazilevich. 1967. Production and mineral cycling in terrestrial vegetation. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh/London. 288 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinozaki, K., K. Yoda, K. Hozumi & T. Kira. 1964. A quantitative analysis of plant form — the pipe model theory. Jap. J. Ecol. 14: 97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurr, S. H. 1952. Forest Inventory. The Ronald Press, New York. 476 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, T. 1974. The growth of two scrub oaks and the cost of their leaves. Proc. Mont. Acad. Sci. 35: 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, T. & D. Dale. 1974. Pinus albicaulis in Central Montana: environment, vegetation and production. Am. Mid. Nat. 92: 222–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, T. & F. Forcella. 1977. Biomass estimates of Northern Rocky Mountain trees and forests. Great Basin Nat. (in press).

  • Weckwerth, R. 1971. Grizzly bear. In: T. Musselh & F. Howell (eds.), Game Management in Montana. Montana Fish and Game, Helena. 238 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westlake, D. F. 1963. Comparisons of plant productivity. Biol. Rev., Cambridge Phil. Soc. 38: 385–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westman, W. E. & R. H. Whittaker. 1975. The pygmy forest region of northern California: studies on biomass and primary productivity. J. Ecol. 63: 493–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H. 1966. Forest dimensions and production in the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecology 47: 103–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H., F. H. Bormann, G. E. Likens & T. G. Siccama. 1974. The Hubbard-Brook ecosystem study: forest biomass and production. Ecol. Monogr. 44: 233–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H. & P. L. Marks. 1975. Methods of assessing terrestrial productivity. In: H. Lieth & R. H. Whittaker (eds.), Primary Productivity of the Biosphere, pp. 55–118. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H. & W. A. Niering. 1975. Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona. V. Biomass, production and diversity along the elevation gradient. Ecology 56: 771–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H. & G. M. Woodwell. 1968. Dimension and production relations of trees and shrubs in the Brookhaven Forest, New York. J. Ecol. 56: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoda, K. 1968. A preliminary survey of the forest vegetation of eastern Nepal. III. Plant biomass in the sample plots chosen from different vegetation zones. J. College Arts Sci., Chiba Univ. Nat. Sci. Ser. 5: 277–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavitkowski, J. & R. D. Stevens. 1972. Primary productivity of red alder ecosystems. Ecology 53: 235–242.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Idiotaxonomy follows that of Hitchcock & Cronquist (1973). There presently is no formal, Latinized syntaxonomical system for the Pacific N.W. of the USA.

The summer field work was funded by the Intermountain forest and Range Experiment Station, U.S. Forest Service, under Contract No. 12-11-204-12, Suppl. No. 33. Funds for computer analyses were generously provided by the Dept. of Biology, Montana State University, and S. Holland (University of California).

The authors thank J. V. Basile, J. Major, R. H. Rumely, the editors H. Lieth and R. H. Whittaker, and a reviewer for Vegetatio for their helpful comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forcella, F., Weaver, T. Biomass and productivity of the subalpine Pinus albicaulis — Vaccinium scoparium association in Montana, USA. Plant Ecol 35, 95–105 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02097219

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02097219

Keywords

Navigation