Skip to main content
Log in

Killing with kindness: Veterinary euthanasia and the social construction of personhood

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

Euthanizing companion animals is a common feature of veterinary practice. Based on data collected during participant observation in a large general veterinary clinic in the Northeast, this discussion focuses on how veterinarians evaluate euthanasia cases, orchestrate euthanasia encounters, and experience the occupational activity of routinely dispensing death. The description of the ambivalence that surrounds euthanasia in veterinary practice is used to ground a general analysis of “personhood” as a constructed social designation and the conflicts focused around the implemented deaths of those beings defined as existing in the contested realm between person/subject and nonperson/object.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, Carol J. 1990 The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akrow, Phillip 1993 “New statistics challenge previously held beliefs about euthanasia.” The Latham Letter 14(2): 1, 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Veterinary Medical Association 1988 The Veterinary Services Market for Companion Animals. Prepared by Charles, Charles Research Group, Overland Park, Kansas.

  • Anderson, James andDavid Caddell 1993 “Attitudes of medical professionals toward euthanasia.” Social Science and Medicine 37(1): 105–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Angell, M. 1988 “Euthanasia.” New England Journal of Medicine 319:1348–1350.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Animal Welfare Institute 1990 Animals and Their Legal Rights. Washington, DC: Animal Welfare Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anspach, Renee 1993 Deciding Who Lives: Fateful Choices in the Intensive-Care Nursery. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antelyes, Jacob 1990 “Client relations when the animal dominates.” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 196(4):578–580.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arluke, Arnold 1988 “Sacrificial symbolism in animal experimentation: Object or pet?” Anthrozoos 2:98–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1990 “The individualization of laboratory animals.” Humane Innovations and Alternatives in Animal Experimentation 4:199–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benrubi, Guy 1992 “Euthanasia—The need for procedural safeguards.” New England Journal of Medicine 326(3):197–198.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, Robert andSteven Taylor 1989 “Relationships with severely disabled people: The social construction of humanness.” Social Problems 36:135–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowd, Alan andKenneth Shapiro 1993 “The case against laboratory animal research in psychology.” Journal of Social Issues 49(1):133–142.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, Clifton andWilliam Snizek 1976 “Practice modes and professional role playing among large and small animal veterinarians” Rural Sociology 41(2):179–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulcroft, Kris, George Helling, and Alexa Albert 1986 “Pets as intimate others.” Paper presented at the meetings of the Midwest Sociological Society, Des Moines, IA, March 28.

  • Burkhart, Julia 1989 “The social construction of personhood.” Social Thought 15(2):2–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, Ann 1985 “Pets as family members.” In Marvin Sussman (ed.), Pets and the Family: 5–10. New York: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantanzaro, Thomas 1992 “Why are there too many euthanasias?” The Latham Letter 13(4):1ff.

  • Cassel, C. K. andD. E. Meier 1990 “Morals and moralism in the debate over euthanasia and assisted suicide.” New England Journal of Medicine 323:750–752.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cigman, Ruth 1980 “Death, misfortune, and species inequality.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 10(1):47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, Robert andPauline Powers 1977 “Socialization for death: The physician's role.” In H. Paul Chalfant, Ebans Curry, and C. Eddie Palmer (eds.), Sociological Stuff: 58–66. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddy, Timothy, Gordon Gallup, Jr., andDaniel Povinelli 1993 “Attribution of cognitive states to animals: Anthropomorphism in comparative perspective.” Journal of Social Issues 49(1):87–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, Caroline 1991 “Sociological introspection and emotional experience.” Symbolic Interaction 14:23–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Susan andAlexandra Todd, eds. 1983 The Social Organization of Doctor-Patient Communication. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogle, Bruce andDavid Abrahamson 1990 “Pet loss: A survey of the attitudes and feelings of practicing veterinarians.” Anthrozoos 3(3):143–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, R. G. 1980 Interests and Rights: The Case Against Animals. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedson, Eliot 1987 “Client control and medical practice.” In John Stoekle (ed.), Encounters between Patients and Doctors: 179–191. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, Eddie 1991 “Pet loss considered from the veterinary perspective.” In Latham Foundation (ed.), Universal Kinship: 119–132. Saratoga, CA: R and E Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, David 1994 A World Without Words. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, Stanford and Stephen Keto 1991 “Creation of the ‘virtual patient’ in medical interaction: A comparison of doctor/patient and veterinarian/client relationships.” Paper presented at the meetings of the American Sociological Association, Cincinnati, OH.

  • Harris, James 1983 “A study of client grief responses to death or loss in a companion animal veterinary practice.” In Aaron Katcher and Alan Beck (eds.), New Perspectives on Our Lives With Companion Animals: 370–376. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, Lynette, Benjamin Hart, andBonnie Mader 1990 “Humane euthanasia and companion animal death: Caring for the animal, the client, and the veterinarian.” Journal of the Veterinary Medical Association 197(10):1292–1299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, Harold, Tamara Vore andJohn New, Jr. 1989 “Conversations with veterinary students.” Anthrozoos 2(3):181–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasper, James andDorothy Nelkin 1992 The Animal Rights Crusade: The Growth of a Moral Protest. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, Bruce 1990 “Ethics and ethnography in neonatal intensive care.” In George Weisz (ed.), Social Science Perspectives on Medical Ethics: 261–272. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahler, Susan 1992 “Stalking a killer: The ‘disease’ of euthanasia.” Journal of the American Veterinary Association 201(7):973–975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman, Sherryl andMartha Copp 1993 emotions and Fieldwork. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogure, Norio andKeiko Yamazaki 1990 “Attitudes to animal euthanasia in Japan: A brief review of cultural influences.” Anthrozoos 3(3):151–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landsberg, Gary 1991 “The distribution of canine behavior cases in three behavior referral practices.” Veterinary Medicine (October): 1011–1018.

  • Lessley, Brian 1991 “Differing visions of the human-animal relationship: Ambiguity in legal doctrine.” In P. P. G. Bateson and Peter H. Klopfer (eds.), Perspectives in Ethology (vol. 9): Human Understanding and Animal Awareness: 87–118. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, Michael andLeo Bustad 1983 “Incidence of euthanasia and euthanasia alternatives in veterinary practice.” In Aaron Katcher and Alan Beck (eds.), New Perspectives on Our Lives With Companion Animals: 366–369. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPartland, Karlyn 1991 “Euthanasia: Helping clients through a difficult time.” Veterinary Practice Staff 3(4):11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noske, Barbara 1989 Humans and Other Animals. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, C. Eddie 1991 “Human emotions: An expanding sociological frontier.” Sociological Spectrum 11(3):213–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, Jeffrey, D. W. Rajecki, andH. D. Craft 1993 “Human perceptions of animal mentality: Ascriptions of thinking.” Journal of Comparative Psychology 107(2):293- 290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollin, Bernard 1990 The Unheeded Cry: Animal Consciousness, Animal Pain, and Science. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, Marvin 1988 “Attitudes toward animals and their effect on veterinary practice management.” In William Kay, Susan Cohen, Carole Fudin, Austin Kutscher, Herbert Neiburg, Ross Grey, and Mohamed Osman (eds.), Euthanasia of the Companion Animal: 133–137. Philadelphia, PA: Charles Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, Clinton 1993 “Understanding dogs: Caretakers' attributions of mindedness in canine-human relationships.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 22(2):205–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1994a “Biting the hand that heals you: Encounters with problematic patients in a general veterinary practice.” Society and Animals 2(1):47–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1994b “Annoying owners: Routine interactions with problematic clients in a general veterinary practice.” Qualitative Sociology 17(1):159–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapontzis, S. F. 1987 Morals, Reason, and Animals. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Self, Donnie, Dawn Schrader, DeWitt Baldwin, Susan Root, Frederick Wolinsky, andJohn Sadduck 1991 “Study of the influence of veterinary medical education on the moral development of veterinary students.” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 198(5):782- 787.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shalinsky, Audrey andAnthony Glascock 1988 “Killing infants and the aged in nonindustrial societies: Removing the liminal.” Social Science Journal 25(3):277–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Kenneth 1989 “The death of the animal: Ontological vulnerability.” Between the Species 5(4):183–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1990 “Understanding dogs through kinesthetic empathy, social construction, and history.” Anthrozoos 3(3):184–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelp, Earl 1989 “Active infant euthanasia is acceptable,” In Neal Bernards (ed.), Euthanasia: Opposing Viewpoints: 190–194. San Diego, CA: Greenhaven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, Peter andM. Siegler 1990 “Euthanasia: A critique.” New England Journal of Medicine 322:1881–1883.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Allen C., III andSherryl Kleinman 1989 “Managing emotions in medical school: Student contacts with the living and the dead.” Social Psychology Quarterly 52(1):56–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soares, Cecelia 1991 “Grief counseling for euthanasia.” In Latham Foundation (ed.), Universal Kinship: 133–142. Saratoga, CA: R and E Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soave, Orland andLester Crawford 1981 Veterinary Medicine and the Law. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, Malcolm andJohn Kitsuse 1987 Constructing Social Problems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, M. 1988 The Dreaded Comparison: Human and Animal Slavery. Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suckiel, Ellen 1978 “Death and benefit in the permanently unconscious patient: A justification of euthanasia.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 3(1):38–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudnow, David 1967 Passing On: The Social Organization of Dying. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeting, Helen andMary Gilhooly 1991/92 “Doctor, am I dead? A review of social death in modern societies.” Omega 24(4):251–269.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, Gresham andDavid Matza 1957 “Techniques of neutralization.” American Sociological Review 22:667–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, Jerrold 1993 “Veterinary medical ethics: A focus of conflicting interests.” Journal of Social Issues 49(1):143–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauer, Carol 1985 “Personhood and human embryos and fetuses.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10(3):253–266.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, Yi-Fu 1984 Dominance and Affection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuchman, Gaye 1978 “Introduction: The symbolic annihilation of women.” In Gaye Tuchman, Arlene Kaplan Daniels, and James Benet (eds.), Hearth and Home: Images of Women in the Mass Media: 3–38. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Victor 1974 Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, John 1988 Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieder, D. Lawrence 1980 “Behavioristic operationalism and the life-world: Chimpanzees and chimpanzee researchers in face-to-face interaction.” Sociological Inquiry 50:75–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zussman, Robert 1992 Intensive Care: Medical Ethics and the Medical Profession. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sanders, C.R. Killing with kindness: Veterinary euthanasia and the social construction of personhood. Sociol Forum 10, 195–214 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02095958

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02095958

Key words

Navigation