Skip to main content
Log in

International scientific co-operation and awareness within the European community: Problems and perspectives

  • 2nd Session: Indicators of S&T Cooperation and Network
  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

International scientific co-operation (ISC) and awareness are topics of increasing interest for both scientists and science policy makers. In this paper, we adopt primarily the science policy point of view. After a concise overview of the literature we summarize the main results of the research we conducted. The main outcome with respect to ISC is that it increases. However, large differences exist between countries and between scientific disciplines. ISC and awareness constitute a complex phenomenon, affected by several factors, science-internal, as well as external. In the paper several techniques are described, amongst which those that can visualize ISC relations through analytical maps. An important aspect of our research methodology is the combination of various quantitative, bibliometric analyses and qualitative research on the structure of science and the relations between science and society. Finally, we sketch perspectives for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M.B. Wallerstein (Ed.)Scientific and Technological Cooperation among Industrialized Countries. The Role of the United States, National Academy Press, Washington D.C., 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Lewison, The Evaluation of European Community Agricultural Research. Paper presented at the Confrence of the Society for the Social Studies of Science, Irvine, USA, 1989.

  3. M. O'Sullivan, A. Fave, E. Galante, P. Henning Petersen, W. Henrichsmeyer, E. Sanchez Monge, G. Wilson, Evaluation of the Agricultural Research Programmes (1976–1978, 1979–1983, and 1984–1988) Research Evaluation Report no. 39. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Brussels, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H.F. Moed, R.E. De Bruin, A. Straathof, A Bibliometric Study of Agricultural Research within the European Community. Research Report for the Commission of the European Communities, Report 89-03, Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H.F. Moed, R.E. De Bruin, A. Straathof, A Bibliometric Study for the Evaluation of the European Communities' Programmes on Medical and Health Research. Research Report for the Commission of the European Communities, Report 90-02, Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.D. Frame, M.P. Carpenter, International research collaboration,Social Studies of Science, 9 (1979) 481–497.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L.A. Lomnitz, M.W. Rees, L. Cameo, Publication and referencing patterns in a Mexican research institute,Social Studies of Science, 17 (1987) 115–133.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Lewison, P. Cunningham, (1989), The use of bibliometrics in the evaluation of community biotechnology research programmes. In:A.F.J. Van Raan, A.J. Nederhof, H.F. Moed (Eds)Science and Technology Indicators. Their Use in Science Policy and their Role in Science Studies, DSWO Press, Leiden, 1989, pp. 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. Schott, International influence in science: Beyond center and periphery,Social Science Research, 17 (1988) 219–238.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M.H. MacRoberts, B.R. MacRoberts, Qualitative measures of communications in science: A study of the formal level,Social Studies of Science, 16 (1986) 151–172.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H.F. Moed, R.E. De Bruin, International scientific cooperation and awareness: A bibliometric case study on agricultural research within the European Community.Newbury Park, 1990, pp. 217–234, In:C.L. Borgman (Ed.),Scholarly Communications and Bibliometrics, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. Garfield,Citation Indexing. Its Theory and Applications in Science, Technology and Humanities, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R.E. De Bruin, H.F. Moed, The unification of addresses in scientific publications. In:L. Egghe, R. Rousseau (Eds),Informetrics Vol. 2, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam 1990, pp. 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Arvanitis, Y. Chatelin, National strategies in tropical soil science.Social Studies of Science, 18 (1988) 113–46.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M.J. Moravcsik, The Coverage of science in the Third World: The “Philadelphia Program”. In:L. Egghe, R. Rousseau (Eds),Informetrics 87/88, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1988, pp. 147–155.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M.P. Carpenter, F. Narin, The adequacy of the Science Citation Index (SCI) as indicator of international research activity.Journal of the American Society for Information Science, (November 1981) 430–439.

  17. R.A. Zwaan, R.E. De Bruin, H.F. Moed, Publication Activity and Internationality of Dutch Research in the Social Sciences: A Methodological Discussion and Some Preliminary Results of an Online Bibliometric Study. Research Report for the Netherlands Advisory Council for Science Policy Research (RAWB), Report SSU-88-04, Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  18. H.F. Moed, The use of online databases for bibliometric analysis. In:L. Egghe, R. Rousseau (Eds)Informetrics 87/88, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1988, pp. 133–146.

    Google Scholar 

  19. H.F. Moed, New developments in online bibliometric analysis, In:A.F.J. Van Raan, A.J. Nederhof, H.F. Moed (Eds),Science and Technology Indicators: Their Use in Science policy and their Role in Science Studies, DSWO-Press, Leiden, 1989, pp. 115–127.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H.F. Moed, Publication Activity and Internationality of Dutch Research in the Natural and Life Sciences (1984–1987). Report SSU-88-03, Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A.J. Nederhof, H.F. Moed, A.M.P.H. Ramaekers, Trends in Publication Activity and International Co-publication in the Natural and Life Sciences (1984–1989): Centre for Studies of Science and Technology, Leiden, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A.J. Nederhof, E.C.M. Noyons, Trends in Publication Activity and International Co-publication in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, and the Humanities (1984–1989), Centre for Studies of Science and Technology, Leiden, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R.E. De Bruin, H. F. Moed, International Scientific Co-operation in European Scientific Research. An Historical Interpretation. Paper Presented at the Conference of the Society for the Social Studies of Science, 1990.

  24. M. Staniland, Francophone Africa: The enduring French connection,Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 489 (1987) 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. Moosi, French foreign policy: The challenge of adaptation,Foreign Affairs, 67/1 (1988) 151–164.

    Google Scholar 

  26. L.R. Lubrano, National and international politics in US-USSR scientific cooperation,Social Studies of Science, 11 (1981) 451–480.

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. Greenacre,Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis, Academic Press, New York, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  28. R.J.W. Tijssen, H.F. Moed, Literature-based statistical analyses of international scientific cooperation: An exploratory case study of the Netherlands. In:A.F.J. Van Raan, A.J. Nederhof, H.F. Moed (Eds),Science and Technology Indicators: Their Use in Science policy and their Role in Science Studies, DSWO-Press, Leiden 1989, pp. 129–146.

    Google Scholar 

  29. A.J. Nederhof, Books and chapters are not to be neglected in measuring research productivity,American Psychologist, 44 (1989) 985–986.

    Google Scholar 

  30. E.C.M. Noyons, A.J. Nederhof, International Comparisons of Departments Research Performance and Assessment of External Knowledge Transfer in the Humanities and the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Report CWTS-89-04, Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  31. A.J. nederhof, R.A. Zwaan Quality judgements of journals as indicators of research performance in the Humanities and the Social and Behavioral Sciences,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, in press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moed, H.F., De Bruin, R.E., Nederhof, A.J. et al. International scientific co-operation and awareness within the European community: Problems and perspectives. Scientometrics 21, 291–311 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02093972

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02093972

Keywords

Navigation