Abstract
Neutralization theory was tested with questionnaires administered to a random sample of public school students (N=298) and institutionalized male delinquents (N=53). Nye-Short delinquency items were factor analyzed to yield three dimensions of delinquency (Predatory, Minor, and Aggressive), and each of the five techniques of neutralization was scored separately. Patterns of acceptance of neutralization techniques were similar among high school males, high school females, and institutionalized males. For example, all three subsamples scored highest on Detail of a Victim and lowest on Appeal to Higher Loyalties. Correlations between each technique of neutralization and each type of delinquency, however, were statistically significant and quite dissimilar. Within the three subsamples, however, there were no discernible patterns among these dissimilar correlations. In fact, few of the differences among these correlations were statistically significant. The analysis provides general support for neutralization theory, but indicates that the particular technique of neutralization as well as the particular type of delinquent act may be viable distinctions in delinquency research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akers, R. I. (1977).Deviant Behavior: A Social Learning Approach, Wadsworth, Belmont, Calif.
Ball, R. (1966). An empirical exploration of neutralization theory.Criminologia 4: 22–32.
Blalock, H. M. (1972).Social Statistics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Hindelang, M. J. (1971). Age, sex and the versatility of delinquency involvements.Soc. Problems 18(Spring): 527–535.
Jensen, G. F., and Eve, R. (1976). Sex differences in delinquency. An examination of popular sociological explanations.Criminology 13(February): 427–448.
Kerlinger, F. (1973).Foundations of Behavioral Research, Holt, New York.
Mannle, H. (1972). An empirical exploration and interpretation of neutralization theory predicted upon sexual differences in the socialization process. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
Miller, D. (1977).Handbook of Research Design and Social Measurement, Longman, New York.
Mitchell, J., and Dodder, R. A. (1980). An examination of types of delinquency through path analysis.J. Youth and Adoles. 9 (3) 239–248.
Mitchell, J., Dodder, R. A., and Norris, T. (in press). Neutralization and delinquency: a comparison by sex of Mexican-American and Anglo youth.Adolescence.
Norris, T., and Dodder, R. A. (1979). A behavioral continuum synthesizing neutralization theory, situational ethics, and juvenile delinquency,Adolescence 14(Fall): 545–555.
Nye, F. I., and Short, J. F. (1958). Scaling delinquent behavior.Am. Sociol. Rev. 22: 326–331.
Sutherland, E. H., and Cressy, D. R. (1974).Criminology, Lippincott, Philadelphia.
Sykes, G. M., and Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency.Am. J. Sociol. 22: 664–670.
Williams, J. R., and Gold, M. (1972). From delinquent behavior to official delinquency.Soc. Problems 20(Fall): 209–229.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received his Ph.D. in sociology, with specializations in social problems, social gerontology, and quantitative sociology, from Oklahoma State University in 1980.
Received his Ph.D. in sociology, with specializations in social problems and quantitative sociology, from the University of Kansas in 1969.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mitchell, J., Dodder, R.A. Types of neutralization and types of delinquency. J Youth Adolescence 12, 307–318 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02088729
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02088729