Abstract
Over a 30-month period, 867 esophageal pH studies were conducted in a Canadian teaching hospital; of these, 315 tests were recorded in patients who were first-time referrals having no chest or upper gastrointestinal surgery and taking no medication that would affect the results. Patients were referred by gastroenterologists, general surgeons, ENT surgeons, thoracic surgeons, and a miscellaneous group. Patients were classified based on: pH results [abnormal=% total time pH<4.0 (ie, >6.0%)], manometry (abnormal=LES resting pressure<5 mm Hg and/or abnormal peristalsis), and gender. Fifty-one percent (162/315) of the patient records demonstrated abnormal reflux. Intergroup comparisons of severity of reflux using two-way analysis of variance demonstrated no significant differences (P=0.13). In the 162 patients who refluxed, 70% (N=108) had normal motility studies; however, when the severity of reflux was compared, patients with abnormal motility (N=54) demonstrated significantly more severe reflux (19.8±12.8 vs 16.2±11.3)P=0.02. In those patients with abnormal manometry, no significant differences (P=0.44) in the severity of reflux were found among those with abnormal peristalsis (N=27), low resting pressure (N=17), or a combination of aperistalsis and low LES pressure (N=10). Symptomatic patients with reflux (N=107) demonstrated a significantly greater percent time pH<4.0 than those with asymptomatic reflux (N=55); 18.1±11.5% vs 16.2±12.7%,P=0.04. When the severity of reflux by gender was compared, no significant differences were found [18.3±11.9 (male)N=91 vs 16.2±11.9 (female)N=71,P=0.11]. The results from this study show that: (1) esophageal pH testing is important in subspecialties other than gastroenterology and that the clinical yield is high in all referring groups, (2) esophageal pH testing and manometry are complimentary tests, but that reflux occurs commonly in association with normal manometry, (3) asymptomatic reflux was found in 34% of the patients with abnormal reflux scores, and (4) the severity of reflux in male and female patients is similar.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Johnson LF, DeMeester TR: Twenty-four hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus: A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 62:325–332, 1974
DeMeester TR, Wang C-I, Wernly JA, Pellegrini CA, Little AG, Klementschitsch P, Bermudez G, Johnson LF, Skinner DB: Technique, indications, and clinical use of 24 hour esophageal pH monitoring. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 79:656–670, 1980
Weiner GJ, Morgan TM, Copper JB, Wu WC, Castell DO, Sinclair JW, Richter JE: Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. Reproducibility and variability of pH parameters. Dig Dis Sci 33:1127–1133, 1988
Ghillebert G, Demeyere AM, Janssens J, Vantrappen G: How well can quantitative 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring distinguish various degrees of reflux disease? Dig Dis Sci 40:1317–1324, 1995
Shoenut JP, Wieler JA, Micflikier AB: The extent and pattern of gastro-oesophageal reflux in patients with scleroderma oesophagus: The effect of low-dose omeprazole. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 7:509–513, 1993
Shoenut JP, Wieler JA, Micflikier AB, Teskey JM: Esophageal reflux performed after isolated myotomy for achalasia. Surgery 108:876–879, 1990
Shoenut JP, Micflikier AB, Yaffe CS, Den Boer B, Teskey JM: Reflux in untreated achalasia patients. J Clin Gastroenterol 20:6–11, 1995
Shoenut JP, Micflikier AB: Retrosternal pain subsequent to sclerotherapy. Gastrointest Endosc 32:84–87, 1986
Pujol A, Grande L, Ros E, Pera C: Utility of inpatient 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux. Dig Dis Sci 33:1134–1140, 1988
Johnson F, Joelsson B, Isbery P-E: Ambulatory 24-hour intraesophageal pH-monitoring in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gut 28:1145–1150, 1987
Shay SS, Abreu SH, Isuchida A: Scintigraphy in gastroesophageal reflux disease: A comparison to endoscopy, LESP, and 24-hour pH score, as well as to simultaneous pH monitoring. Am J Gastroenterol 87:1096–1101, 1992
Spence FAJ, Collins BJ, Parks TG, Love AHG: Does age influence normal gastrooesophageal reflux? Gut 26:799–801, 1985
Richter JE, Bradley LA, DeMeester TR, Wu WC: Normal 24-hr ambulatory esophageal pH values. Influence of study center, pH electrode, age, and gender. Dig Dis Sci 37:849–856, 1992
Schoeman MN, Tippett MD, Akkermans LMA, Dent J, Holloway RH: Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in ambulant healthy human subjects. Gastroenterology 108:83–91, 1995
Mittal RK, Holloway RH, Penagini R, Blackshaw LA, Dent J: Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. Gastroenterology 109:601–610, 1995
Baldi F, Ferrarini F, Longanesi A, Ragazzini M, Barbara L: Acid gastroesophageal reflux and symptom occurrence. Dig Dis Sci 34:1890–1893, 1989
Robinson M, Allen ML: In the community hospital setting, what is the role of esophageal manometry? Am J Gastroenterol 85:129–130, 1990
Johnston PW, Johnston BT, Collins BJ, Collins JSA, Love AHG: Audit of the role of oesophageal manometry in clinical practice. Gut 34:1158–1161, 1993
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Patrick Shoenut, J., Yaffe, C.S. Ambulatory esophageal pH testing. Digest Dis Sci 41, 1102–1107 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02088226
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02088226