Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of cimetropium bromide on esophageal motility and transit in patients affected by primary achalasia

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of cimetropium bromide, a new anticholinergic agent, in patients with primary achalasia was studied. Twenty such patients (12 females and 8 males, mean age 38 years, range 15–56) were studied. Diagnosis was performed by radiology, endoscopy, and manometry. Lower esophageal sphincter pressure and body wave amplitude were measured by means of a five-channel catheter constantly perfused by a low-compliance pneumohydraulic pump. Patient received cimetropium bromide 10 mg intravenously over 3 min or placebo in a double-blind manner. In five patients esophageal transit evaluated by scintiscanning was studied on separate occasions after cimetropium bromide or placebo. Baseline mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure was 46±5 mm Hg and mean amplitude of body waves was 30±8 mm Hg. Cimetropium bromide induced a significant decrease in sphincter pressure and body wave amplitude that measured 13±3 mm Hg and 8±4 mm Hg, respectively, 15 min after the end of infusion. The decrease was maintained for 45±5 min. A marked reduction in repetitive body waves was also noted. Esophageal transit was also accelerated with cimetropium bromide. Maximal stomach radioactivity was observed after 8±1.8 sec while with placebo this was reached after 65±1.5 sec (P<0.01). It is concluded that cimetropium bromide reduces LES pressure and shortens transit in primary esophageal achalasia. It may be useful in the treatment of this esophageal motility disorder.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Traube M: On drugs and dilators for achalasia. Dig Dis Sci 36:257–259, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  2. Triadafilopulos G, Aaronson M, Sackel S, Burakoff R: Medical treatment of esophageal achalasia. Double-blind crossover study with oral nifedipine, verapamil, and placebo. Dig Dis Sci 36:260–267, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schiavone A, Schiavi GB, De Conti L, Micheletti R, Sagrada A, Hammer R, Giachetti A: Cimetropium: Characterization of antimuscarinic and spasmolytic properties. Arzneimforsch Drug Res 35:766–769, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sagrada A, Schiavone A, Cefalá, Micheletti R: Cimetropium bromide:In vitro andin vivo evaluation of spasmolytic activity on human and dog colon. Digestion 42:143–150, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marzio L, Pieramico O, Neri M, Delle Donne M, Dimitri A, Imbimbo BP, Cuccurullo F: Comparative study of the effects of cimetropium bromide and atropine on human esophageal motor functions. Digestion 44:117–123, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bassotti G, Gaburri M, Imbimbo PB, Betti C, Daniotti S, Pelli MA, Morelli A: Manometric evaluation of cimetropium bromide activity in patients with nutcracker oesophagus. Scand J Gastroenterol 23:1079–1084, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  7. Russell COH, Whelan G: Oesophageal manometry: How well does it predict oesophageal function. Gut 28:590–594, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dent J: A new technique for continuous sphincter pressure measurement. Gastroenterology 71:263–267, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  9. Daniel EE, Bowes KL, Duchon G: The structural basis for control of gastrointestinal motility in man.In Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Gastrointestinal Motility. G Vantrappen (ed). Herentals, Belgium, Typoff Press, 1975, pp 142–151

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gilbert R, Rattan S, Goyal RK: Pharmacologic identification, activation and antagonism of two muscarine receptors subtypes in the lower esophageal sphincter. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 230:284–291, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  11. Holloway RH, Dodds WJ, Helm JF, Hogan WJ, Dent J, Arndorfer RC: Integrity of cholinergic innervation to the lower esophageal sphincter in achalasia. Gastroenterology 90:924–929, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tøttrup A, Forman A, Funch-Jensen P, Raundahl U, Andersson K-E: Effects of postganglionic nerve stimulation in oesophageal achalasia: anin vitro study. Gut 31:17–20, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goldenberg SP, Burrel M, Fette GG, Vos C, Traube M: Classic and vigorous achalasia: A comparison of manometric, radiographic, and clinical findings. Gastroenterology 101:743–748, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  14. Paterson WG, Hynna-Liepert TT, Seluky M: Comparison of primary and secondary esophageal peristalsis in humans: effect of atropine. Am J Physiol 260:G52-G57, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  15. Netscher D, Larson GM, Polk HC Jr: Radionuclide esophageal transit. A screening test for esophageal disorders. Arch Surg 121:843–848, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  16. Holloway RH, Lange RC, Plankey MW, McCallum RW: Detection of esophageal motor disorders by radionuclide transit studies. A reappraisal. Dig Dis Sci 34:905–912, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gelfond M, Rozen P, Gilat T: Isosorbide dinitrate and nifedipine treatment of achalasia: A clinical manometric and radionuclide evaluation. Gastroenterology 83:963–969, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  18. Imbimbo BP, Daniotti S, Vidi A, Foschi D, Saporiti F, Ferrante L: Discontinuous oral absorption of cimetropium bromide, a new antispasmodic drug. J Pharm Sci 75:680–684, 1986

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marzio, L., Grossi, L., DeLaurentiis, M.F. et al. Effect of cimetropium bromide on esophageal motility and transit in patients affected by primary achalasia. Digest Dis Sci 39, 1389–1394 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02088038

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02088038

Key words

Navigation