Skip to main content
Log in

Balloon or bougie for dilatation of benign esophageal structure?

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ninety-three adult patients with benign esophageal stricture were randomized to receive balloon or bougie dilatation. Eighty-five patients were eligible for analysis and were followed prospectively for a year. Twenty-four patients required repeat dilatation within a year, but 50 patients completed a year's follow-up without further dilatation. The bougie group initially had a better symptomatic result, experiencing significantly less dysphagia at five months, although this difference had disappeared at one year. Eighteen patients in the balloon group required redilatation for symptoms compared with six in the bougie group. The bougie group had a significantly greater increase in their stricture diameter, and this was still present at one year after dilatation. There was no significant difference in safety or patient acceptability. Balloons are probably more costly to use than bougies. Bougie dilatation is to be preferred to balloon dilatation in adults except in special circumstances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. London RL, Trotman BW, DiMarino AJ, Oleaga JA, Freiman DB, Ring EJ, Rosato EF: Dilatation of severe esophageal strictures by an inflatable balloon catheter. Gastroenterology 80:173–175, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cox JGC, Winter RK, Maslin SC, Jones R, Buckton GK, Hoare RC, Sutton DR, Bennett JR: Balloon or bougie for dilatation of benign esophageal stricture? An interim report of a randomised controlled trial. Gut 29:1741–1747, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shemesh E, Czerniak A: Comparison between Savary-Gilliard and balloon dilatation of benign esophageal strictures. World J Surg 14:518–522, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yamamoto H, Hughes RW, Schroeder KW, Viggiano TR, DiMagno EP: Treatment of benign esophageal stricture by Eder-Puestow or balloon dilators: A comparison between randomized and prospective nonrandomized trials. Mayo Clin Proc 67:228–236, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dyet JF, Bennett JR, Buckton GK, Ashworth D: The radiological measurement of esophageal stricture diameter. Clin Radiol 34:647–649, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dakkak M, Bennett JR: Comparison between Savary-Gilliard and balloon dilatation of benign esophageal strictures. World J Surg 15:667, 1991 (letter)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cox JGC, Dakkak M, Buckton GK, Bennett JR: Dilators for esophageal stricture—a description of a new bougie and a comparison of current instruments. Gastrointest Endosc 35:551–554, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tulman AB, Boyce HW: Complications of esophageal dilatation and guidelines for their prevention. Gastrointest Endosc 27:229–234, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dakkak M, Bennett JR: Balloon technology and its applications in gastrointestinal endoscopy.In Clinical Gastroenterology, vol 5. Bailliere, 1991, pp 195–208

  10. Cox JGC, Buckton GK, Bennett JR: Radial pressures during stricture dilatation with bougies and balloons. Gut 28:A1370–A1371, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  11. Graham DY, Lacey Smith J: Balloon dilatation of benign and malignant strictures—blind retrograde balloon dilatation. Gastrointest Endosc 31:171–174, 1985

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cox, J.G.C., Winter, R.K., Maslin, S.C. et al. Balloon or bougie for dilatation of benign esophageal structure?. Digest Dis Sci 39, 776–781 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02087423

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02087423

Key words

Navigation