Skip to main content
Log in

Differences in the distribution of urea and creatinine between red cells and plasma in normal and azotemic blood as assessed by autoanalyzer and manual chemical methods

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been proposed that urea and creatinine may bind to red cell constituents. In the present studies, whole blood and plasma concentrations of urea and creatinine were compared using autoanalyzer techniques (that require solutes to pass through a dialysis membrane) and manual techniques (with no dialysis membrane). Blood samples from 11 normal and 10 azotemic subjects were studied. Concentration differences between plasma water and red cell water for these solutes were significant in normals with standard manual but not with autoanalyzer methods. Accordingly, red cell water concentrations in normals were greater with manual methods than with autoanalyzer methods. In azotemics, differences between red cell and plasma water concentrations and differences in red cell water concentrations between methods were proportionately less. The findings suggest that accumulation of these solutes in the red cell in azotemia is predominantly in the freely diffusable form. Any chemical interference of red cell proteins and/or solute binding to red cell constituents yields significant discrepancies between manual and autoanalyzer methods only at lower BUN and creatinine concentrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martinek, R. G.: Review of methods for determining urea nitrogen in biologic fluids.J. Am. Med. Technol., 31, 678 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Murdaugh, V., Jr., Doyle, E.M.: Effect of hemoglobin on erythrocyte urea concentration.J. Lab. Clin. Med., 57, 759 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Katz, M. A., Hull, A. R.: Transcellular creatinine disequilibrium and its significance in hemodialysis.Nephron, 12, 171 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nolph, K. D., Bass, O. E., Maher, J. F.: Acute effects of hemodialysis on removal of intracellular solutes.Trans. Am. Soc. Artif. Intern. Organs, 20, 622 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grossman, D. F., Kopp, K. F.: Kinetics of urea diffusion in the organism during hemodialysis. A quantitative control of elimination of urea.Proc. Europ. Dialysis Transplant. Ass., 3, 290 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grossman, D. F., Kopp, K. F., Frey, J.: Transport of urea by erythrocytes during hemodialysis.Proc. Europ. Dialysis. Transplant. Ass., 4, 250 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Henry, R. J., Chiamori, N.: The direct Nesslerization of ammonia formed by urease treatment of blood serum and urine.Amer. J. Clin. Path., 29, 277 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chaney, A. D., Marback, E. P.: Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia.Clin. Chem., 8, 130 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gentxkow, C. J.: An accurate method for the determination of blood urea nitrogen by direct Nesslerization.J. Biol. Chem., 143, 531 (1942).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Owen, J. A., Ipzo, B., Scandrett, F. J., Stewart, C. P.: The determination of creatinine in plasma or serum and in urine. A critical examination.Biochem. J., 58, 426 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chasson, A. D., Grady, H. T., Stanky, M. A.: Determination of creatinine by means of automatic chemical analysis.Amer. J. Clin. Path., 35, 83 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marsh, W. H., Fingerhut, B., Miller, H.: Automated and manual direct methods for determination of blood urea.Clin. Chem., 11, 624 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Air Force Technical Report 6039, U.S.A.F. Standard Values in Blood, July 1951.

  14. Davis, F. E., Kenyon, K., Kirk, J.: A rapid titrimetric method for determining the water content of human blood.Science, 118, 276 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wintrobe, M. M.: Clinical Hematology. 5th Ed. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia 1961, p. 124.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wearne, J. T.: Non-specificity of hypochlorite-phenol estimation of ammonium in biological material.Anal. Chem., 35, 327 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Richterich, R.: Clinical Chemistry. Theory and Practice. Karger, Basel 1969, pp. 253–256.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bass, O. E., Nolph, K. D., Maher, J. F.: Dialysance and clearance measurements during clinical dialysis. A plea for standardization.J. Lab. Clin. Med., 86, 378 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nolph, K., Felts, J., Moore, R. et al. Differences in the distribution of urea and creatinine between red cells and plasma in normal and azotemic blood as assessed by autoanalyzer and manual chemical methods. International Urology and Nephrology 10, 59–64 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02082794

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02082794

Keywords

Navigation