Abstract
Basin analysis for paleocurrent directions commonly makes use of hundreds of cross-bedding dip and strike measurements taken on structurally tilted sedimentary beds which may be parts of plunging folds. For regional interpretations the desired forms of data are vector means and rose diagrams of dip directions after reduction to the assumed horizontal plane of deposition. Three FORTRAN computer programs have been integrated to perform the data reduction from raw field measurements to graphic plotted rose diagrams. Program PLUNGR rotates the raw field data back to the original horizontal plane of deposition. Output from PLUNGR is a deck of punched cards suitable for input into the second and third programs, with provision for various regroupings of data. VECMEN computes vector mean and other statistics on data groups defined by inserted control cards. Program ROSE, with a variety of options, plots a rose diagram of dip direction azimuths on a CalComp plotter.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Griffiths, J. C., and Rosenfeld, M. A., 1953, A further test of dimensional orientation of quartz grains in Bradford Sand: Am. Jour. Sci., v. 251, no. 3, p. 192–214.
Parks, J. M., 1970a, Computerized trigonometric method for rotation of structurally tilted sedimentary directional features: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 81, no. 2, p. 537–540.
Parks, J. M., 1970b, Computerized trigonometric solution for finding original dip azimuth and inclination of cross-beds in plunging folded strata: Geol. Soc. America, Abstracts with Programs, v. 2, no. 1, p. 31.
Potter, P. G., and Pettijohn, F. J., 1963, Paleocurrents and basin analysis: Academic Press, Inc., New York, 296 p.
Reiche, P., 1938, An analysis of cross-lamination of the Coconino Sandstone: Jour. Geology, v. 46, no. 7, p. 905–932.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Parks, J.M. Paleocurrent analysis of sedimentary crossbed data with graphic output using three integrated computer programs. Mathematical Geology 6, 353–362 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02082356
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02082356