Skip to main content
Log in

Isolation and description of a non-motile, fusiform, stalked bacterium, a representatieve of a new genus

  • Published:
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A single strain representing the fusiform group of caulobacters first described by Henrici and Johnson has been isolated from a freshwater pond. Like the genusCaulobacter this is a chemo-organotrophic bacterium that has one polar prostheca, a stalk in the sense that its apical holdfast permits the cell to attach to solid substrates. Fine structure studies reveal, however, that the prostheca of this organism contains typical cellular constituents, not the membranous material found in the stalks ofCaulobacter andAsticcacaulis. The organism also differs from the other caulobacters in having no motile stage and no dimorphic life cycle (both daughter cells are stalked at the time of division). Because only one strain has been isolated no nomenclatural proposals are made, but sufficient evidence is presented to indicate that this is a representative of a new genus of the Schizomycetes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cohen-Bazire, G., Sistrom, W.R. andStanier, R. Y. 1957. Kinetic studies of pigment synthesis by non-sulfur purple bacteria. - J. Cellular Comp. Physiol.49: 25–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrici, A. T. andJohnson, D. E. 1935. Studies of freshwater bacteria. II. Stalked bacteria, a new order of Schizomycetes. - J. Bacteriol30: 61–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houwink, A. L. 1951.Caulobacter versusBacillus spec. div. - Nature168: 654–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pate, J. L. andOrdal, E. J. 1965. The fine structure of two unusual stalked bacteria. - J. Cell Biol.27: 133–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poindexter, J. Stove. 1964. Biological properties and classification of the Caulobacter group. - Bacteriol. Rev.28: 231–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poindexter, J. L. Stove andCohen-Bazire, G. 1964. The fine structure of stalked bacteria belonging to the family Caulobacteraceae. - J. Cell Biol.23: 587–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryter, A., Kellenberger, E., Birch-Andersen, A. etMaaløe, O. 1958. Etude au microscope électronique de plasmas contenant de l'acide désoxyribonucléique. I. Les nucléoides des bactéries en croissance active. - Z. Naturforsch.13b: 597–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J. M. andStanier, R. Y. 1965. Isolation and characterization of bacteriophages active against stalked bacteria. - J. Gen. Microbiol.39: 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staley, J. T. 1968.Prosthecomicrobium andAncalomicrobium: New prosthecate freshwater bacteria. - J. Bacteriol.95: 1921–1942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavarzin, G. A. 1961. Budding bacteria (English translation). Microbiology30: 774–791.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We would like to thank M. Mandel who determined the molar base composition of the DNA and Jean M. Schmidt who furnished the caulobacters and their phages. We also appreciate the comments of Jeanne S. Poindexter who reviewed the manuscript and R. E. Buchanan for his thoughts on nomenclature.

The research was supported in part by the Office of Water Resources, Annual Allotment Grant 14-01-0001-1842, and the Michigan State Agricultural Experiment Station.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Bont, J.A.M., Staley, J.T. & Pankratz, H.S. Isolation and description of a non-motile, fusiform, stalked bacterium, a representatieve of a new genus. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 36, 397–407 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02069040

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02069040

Keywords

Navigation