Skip to main content
Log in

Quality control in IVF with mouse bioassays: A four years' experience

  • Animal Experimentation
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: We analyzed retrospectively the relevance of 4 years of quality control on homemade culture medium with the mouse IVF and zygote bioassay.

Design: In vitro or in vivo fertilized mouse oocytes were cultured in each batch of medium. Two-cell-stage and expanded blastocyst development was recorded for each batch of medium. Data on fertilization and embryo quality obtained in human in vitro fertilization were recorded for each batch. IVF treatment cycles for male infertility and cycles with sperm microinjection were excluded.

Results: Human oocyte fertilization dropped from 60 to 54%, respectively, from 57 to 41% in a significant way (P<0.05 resp. P<0.01) and the human mean embryo score decreased from 4.17±1.21 to 3.69±1.06 (P<0.05) when media were used with a low two-cell-stage development (≤75%) for the mouse zygote or mouse IVF bioassay. The pregnancy rate was not affected.

Conclusions: Media with high scores in mouse bioassays show higher fertilization rates and better embryo quality when used for human IVF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Critchlow J, Matson P, Newman M, Horne G, Troup S, Lieberman A: Quality control in an in-vitro fertilization laboratory: Use of human sperm survival studies. Hum Reprod 1989;4:545–549

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bavister B, Andrews J: A rapid sperm motility bioassay for quality control testing of water and culture media. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1988;5:67–74

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reed M, Petters R: An evaluation of hamster, rat, and mouse sperm cell motility in media formulated in media with water of different qualities. J Vitro Fert Embry Transfer 1991;8:41–47

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ackerman S, Swanson R, Stokes G, Veeck L: Culture of mouse preimplantation embryos as a quality control assay for human in vitro fertilization. Gamete Res 1984;9:145–152

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bavister B: A consistently successful procedure for in vitro fertilization of golden hamster eggs. Gamete Res 1989;23:139–158

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Davidson A, Vermesh M, Lobo R, Paulson R: Mouse embryo culture as quality control for human in vitro fertilization: The one-cell versus the two-cell model. Fertil Steril 1988;49:516–521

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. George M, Doe B: The influence of handling procedures during mouse oocyte and embryo recovery on viability and subsequent development in vitro. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1989;6:69–72

    Google Scholar 

  8. Scott L, Sundaram S, Smith S: The relevance and use of mouse embryo bioassays for quality control in an assisted reproductive technology program. Fertil Steril 1993;60:559–568

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hogan B, Constantini F, Lacy E: Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  10. Englert Y, Van den Bergh M, Rodesch C, Vandervorst P, Berberoglugil P, Laruelle C, Biramane J, Gervy C, Schwers J: Nouveau programme de fécondation in vitro à l'hôpital Erasme: premiers résultats et aspects originaux. Rev Med Brux 1991;12:305–314

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Puissant F, Van Rysselberge M, Barlow P, Deweze J, Leroy F: Embryo scoring as a prognostic tool in IVF treatment. Hum Reprod 1987;2:705–708

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gerrity M: Mouse embryo culture essay.In Wolf D, Bavister D, Gerrity M, Kopf G (eds), In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer: A Manual of Basic Techniques. New York: Plenum Press, 19xx, pp 57–76

  13. Johnson D, Hodgen G: Syringe-associated toxicity of culture media on mouse ans monkey preembryos. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1991;8:198–201

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rinehart J, Bavister B, Gerrity M: Quality control in the in vitro fertilization laboratory: Comparison of bioassay systems for quality water. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1988;5:335–342

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fleming T, Prath H, Braude P: The use of mouse preimplantation embryos for quality control of culture reagents in human in vitro fertilization programs: Acautionary note. Fertil Steril 1987;47:858–860

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Montora L, Subias E, Young P, Baccaro M, Swanson J, Sueldo C: Detection of endotoxin in human in vitro fertilization by the zona-free mouse embryo essay. Fertil Steril 1990;54:109–112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fishel S, Jackson P, Webster J, Faratian B: Endotoxins in culture medium for human in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1988;49:108–111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Snyman E, Van der Werve J: Endotoxin-polluted medium in a human in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril 1986;46:273–276

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. George M, Braude P, Johnson M, Sweetnam D: Quality control in the IVF laboratory: In vitro and in vivo development of mouse embryos is unaffected by the quality of water used in culture media. Hum Reprod 1989;4:826–831

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dankekar P, Glass R: Development of mouse embryos is affected by strain and culture medium. Gamete Res 1987;17:279–285

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jackson K, Kiessling A: Fertilization and cleavage of mouse oocytes exposed to the conditions of human oocyte retrieval. Fertil Steril 1989;51:675–681

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bavister B: Culture of preimplantation embryos: Facts and artefacts. Hum Reprod Update 1995;1:91–148

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Endo A, Watanabe T: Effects of non-24-days on reproductive efficacy and embryonic development in mice. Gamete Res 1989;22:435–441

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dodson M, Minhas B, Curtis S, Palmer T, Robertson L: Spontaneaous zona reaction in the mouse as a limiting factor for the time in which an oocyte may be fertilized. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1989;6:101–106

    Google Scholar 

  25. Clarke R, Griffin P, Biggers J: Screening of maternal serum is not predictive of human embryo development or IVF outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet 1995;12:20–25

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van den Bergh, M., Baszó, I., Biramane, J. et al. Quality control in IVF with mouse bioassays: A four years' experience. J Assist Reprod Genet 13, 733–738 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02066429

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02066429

Key words

Navigation