Skip to main content
Log in

Tests and refinements of a general structure-activity model for avian repellents

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We tested the robustness of a structure-activity model for avian trigeminal chemoirritants. Fourteen benzoates and acetophenones were tested using European starlingsSturnus vulgaris as a bioassay. In general, the previously proposed model was a reasonable predictor of repellency (i.e., irritant potency). We found that the presence of a phenyl ring was critical to repellency. Basicity of the molecule is the next most critical feature influencing repellency. The presence of an acidic function within the electron-withdrawing functionality seriously detracts from repellency. The presence or absence of an electron-withdrawing or -donating group may potentiate repellent effects, but its presence is not critical, so long as the phenyl ring is electron rich. Our data suggest that there is ano-aminoacetophenone/methyl anthranilate trigeminal chemoreceptor in birds analogous to the mammalian capsaicin receptor. Both receptors contain a benzene site. However, birds seem to lack the associated thiol/hydrogen-bonding site present in mammals which is needed to activate the benzene site. Rather, birds may possess an associated exposed charged site that in turn may interact with the stimulus to activate the benzene site. These differences may explain the differential sensitivity of birds and mammals to aromatic irritants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Clark, L., andMason, J.R. 1993. Interactions between sensory and postingestional repellents in starlings: Methyl anthranilate and sucrose.Ecol. Appl. 3:262–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L., andShah, P.S. 1991. Nonlethal bird repellents: in search of a general model relating repellency and chemical structure.J. Wildl. Manage. 55:538–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L., andSmeraski, C.A. 1990. Seasonal shifts in odor acuity by starlings.J. Exp. Zool. 255:22–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L., Shah, P.S. andMason, J.R. 1991. Chemical repellency in birds: relationship between chemical structure and avoidance response.J. Exp. Zool. 260:310–322.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dolbeer, R.A., Link, M.A., andWoronecki, P.P. 1988. Naphthalene shows no repellency for starlings.Wildl. Soc. Bull. 16:62–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finger, T.E., Getchell, M.L., Getchell, T.V., andKinnamon, J.C. 1990. Affector and effector functions of peptidergic innervation of the nasal cavity, pp. 1–18,in B.G. Green, J.R. Mason and M.R. Kare (eds.). Chemical Senses, Vol. 2, Irritation. Marcel Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furia, V., andBellanca, N. 1971. Fenaroli's Handbook of Flavor Ingredients. CRC Press, Cleveland, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakubas, W.J., Shah, P.S., Mason, J.R., andNorman, D.M. 1992. Avian repellency of coniferyl and cinnamyl derivatives.Ecol. Appl. 2:147–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J.R., andOtis, D.L. 1990. Effectiveness of six potential irritants on consumption by red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) and starlings (Sturnus vulgaris); pp. 309–322,in B.G. Green, J.R. Mason and M.R. Kare (eds.). Chemical Senses, Vol. 2, Irritation. Marcel Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J.R., Adams, M.J., andClark, L. 1989. Anthranilate repellency to starlings: chemical correlates and sensory perception.J. Wildl. Manage. 53:55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J.R., Bean, N.J., Shah, P.S., andClark, L. 1991. Taxon-specific differences in responsiveness to capsaicin and several analogues: Correlates between chemical structure and behavioral aversiveness.J. Chem. Ecol. 17:2539–2551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, G.D. 1991. Mechanisms of activation of the sensory irritant receptor by airborne chemicals.Toxicology 21:183–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, W. 1983. Responses to sugars and their behavioural mechanisms in the starlings (Sturnus vulgaris L.).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 13:243–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, P.S., Mason, J.R., andClark, L. 1991. Prediction of avian repellency from chemical structure: The aversiveness of vanillin, vanillyl alcohol and veratryl alcohol.Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 40:169–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solzcsanyi, J., andJancso-Gabor, A. 1975. Sensory effects of capsaicin congeners I. Relationship between chemical structure and pain-producing potency of pungent agents.Arzneim.-Forsch. (Drug Res.) 25:1877–1881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solzcsanyi, J., Sann, H., andPierau, F.-K. 1986. Nociception in pigeons is not impaired by capsaicin.Pain 27:247–260.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clark, L., Shah, P. Tests and refinements of a general structure-activity model for avian repellents. J Chem Ecol 20, 321–339 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02064441

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02064441

Key Words

Navigation