Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical characteristics and natural history of symptomatic but not excess gastroesophageal reflux

  • Esophageal, Gastric, And Duodenal Disorders
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Esophageal pH monitoring in patients with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms identifies some who have normal esophageal acid exposure but nevertheless a convincing correlation between symptoms and those reflux events that do occur. These patients may exhibit enhanced sensory perception of physiological reflux. Little is known about the natural history of reflux symptoms in this group, which in our experience comprises up to 6% of those referred for diagnostic pH monitoring. We have therefore followed up by postal questionnaire 70 patients whose initial pH study had demonstrated normal acid exposure but a symptom index ≥50% and 58 patients found to have excess reflux, for a median of 4.4 and 6.5 years, respectively. The presenting character and frequency of symptoms and endoscopic and manometric findings were similar in the two groups. At review overall symptom frequency had improved (P<0.01) for both groups similarly. However, 87% of those with normal acid exposure and 79% of those with excess reflux remained symptomatic, 53% and 47%, respectively, recording their symptoms to be the same or worse than at original presentation, despite over 60% in each group continuing to take regular medication. Only six patients in each group were asymptomatic and receiving no therapy at the time of review. The results demonstrate that patients with symptomatic but not excess gastroesophageal reflux constitute a significant clinical problem. Both the persistence of their symptoms and their requirement for therapy are similar to that observed in “genuine” refluxers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Richter JE, Castell DO: Gastroesophageal reflux; pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy. Ann Intern Med 97:93–103, 1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Smout AJPM: Ambulatory monitoring of esophageal pH and pressure.In The Esophagus. DO Castell (ed). Boston, Little Brown, 1992, pp 161–177

    Google Scholar 

  3. Galmiche JP, Scarpignato C: Esophageal pH monitoring.In Functional Investigation in Esophageal Disease. Frontiers in Gastrointestinal Research, Vol 22. C. Scarpignato, JP Galmiche (eds). Basel, Karger, 1994, pp 71–108

    Google Scholar 

  4. Weiner GJ, Richter JE, Cooper JB, Wu WC, Castell DO: The symptom index: A clinically important parameter of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. Am J Gastroenterol 83:358, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dent J, Dodds WJ, Friedman RH, et al: Mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux in recumbent asymptomatic human subjects. J Clin Invest 65:256–267, 1980

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. De Caestecker JS, Heading RC: Esophageal pH monitoring. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 19:645–669, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Howard PJ, Pryde A, Heading RC: Relationship between gastroesophageal reflux and symptoms in patients referred for ambulatory pH-monitoring. J Gastrointest Motil 2:231–239, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  8. Johnston BT, McFarland RJ, Collins JSA, Love AHG: Symptom index as a marker of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg 79:1054–1055, 1992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Singh S, Richter JE, Bradley LA, Haile JM: The symptom index: differential usefulness in suspected acid-related complaints of heartburn and chest pain. Dig Dis Sci 38:1402–1408, 1993

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Richter JE, Baldi F, Clouse RE, Diamant NE, Janssens J, Staiano A: Functional oesophageal diseases. Gastroenterol Int 5:3–17, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  11. Murphy DW, Yuan Y, Castell DO: Does the intraesophageal pH probe accurately detect acid reflux? Simultaneous recording with two pH probes in humans. Dig Dis Sci 34:649–656, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. De Caestecker JS: 24 hour pH monitoring: advances and controversies. NJ Med 34:S20-S39, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  13. Benjamin SR, Richter JE, Cordova CM, Knuff TE, Castell DO: Prospective manometric evaluation with pharmacologic provocation of patients with suspected esophageal motility dysfunction. Gastroenterology 84:893–901, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Howard PJ, Maher L, Pryde A, Heading RC: Symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux, abnormal oesophageal acid exposure, and mucosal acid sensitivity are three separate, though related, aspects of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Gut 32:128–132, 1991

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnsson F, Joelsson B, Isberg PE: Ambulatory 24-hour intraoesophageal pH-monitoring in the diagnosis of gastrooesophageal reflux disease. Gut 28:1145, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sontag SJ: Rolling review: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Ailment Pharmacol Ther 7:293–312, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  17. Spechler SJ: Barrett's esophagus: what's new and what to do. Am J Gastroenterol 84:220–223, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Baldi F, Ferrarini F, Longanesi A, Ragazzini M, Barbara L: Acid gastroesophageal reflux and symptom occurrence: Analysis of some factors influencing their association. Dig Dis Sci 34:1890–1893, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. De Caestecker JS, Heading RC: The pathophysiology of reflux.In Reflux Oesophagitis. TPJ Hennessy, A Cuschier, JR Bennett (eds). London, Butterworth, 1989, pp 1–36

    Google Scholar 

  20. Trimble KC, Pryde A, Heading RC: Lowered oesophageal sensory thresholds in patients with symptomatic but not excess gastroesophageal reflux: Evidence for a spectrum of visceral sensitivity in GORD. Gut (in press)

  21. Johnsson F, Joelsson B: Reproducibility of ambulatory oesophageal pH-monitoring. Gut 29:886–889, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Weiner GJ, Morgan TM, Copper JB, Wu WC, Castell DO, Sinclair JW, Richter JE: Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring: Reproducibility and variability of pH parameters. Dig Dis Sci 33:1127–1133, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Eriksen CA, Cushieri A: Diagnostic tests for gastrooesophageal reflux disease.In Reflux Oesophagitis. TPJ Hennessy, A Cuschieri, JR Bennett (eds). London, Butterworth 1989, pp 55–86

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pace F, Santalucia F, Bianchi Porro G: Natural history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease without oesophagitis. Gut 32:845–848, 1991

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schindlbeck NE, Klauser AG, Berghammer G, Londong W, Mueller-Lissner SA: Three year follow-up of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gut 33:1016–1019, 1992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuster E, Ros E, Toledo-Pimentel V, Pujol A, Bordas JM, Grande L, Pera C: Predictive factors of the long term outcome in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: Six year follow up of 107 patients. Gut 35:8–14, 1994

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. McDougall NI, Johnston BT, Kee F, Collins JSA, McFarland RJ, Watson RGP, Love AHG: The natural history of reflux oesophagitis: a ten year follow-up. Gut 35(suppl 2):T86, 1994 (Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trimble, K.C., Douglas, S., Pryde, A. et al. Clinical characteristics and natural history of symptomatic but not excess gastroesophageal reflux. Digest Dis Sci 40, 1098–1104 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02064206

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02064206

Key words

Navigation