Skip to main content
Log in

Location and allocation for distribution systems with transshipments and transportion economies of scale

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Locating transshipment facilities and allocating origins and destinations to transshipment facilities are important decisions for many distribution and logistic systems. Models that treat demand as a continuous density over the service region often assume certain facility locations or a certain allocation of demand. It may be assumed that facility locations lie on a rectangular grid or that demand is allocated to the nearest facility or allocated such that each facility serves an equal amount of demand. These assumptions result in suboptimal distribution systems. This paper compares the transportation cost for suboptimal location and allocation schemes to the optimal cost to determine if suboptimal location and allocation schemes can produce nearly optimal transportation costs. Analytical results for distribution to a continuous demand show that nearly optimal costs can be achieved with suboptimal locations. An example of distribution to discrete demand points indicates the difficulties in applying these results to discrete demand problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.F. Campbell, Designing logistics systems by analyzing transportation, inventory and terminal costs tradeoffs, J. Bus. Logist. 11(1990)159.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.F. Campbell, Freight consolidation and routing with transportation economies of scale, Transp. Res. 24B(1990)345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J.F. Campbell, Location-allocation for distribution to a continuous demand with transshipments, Naval Res. Logist. 39(1992)635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J.F. Campbell, One-to-many distribution with transshipments, Transp. Sci. (to appear).

  5. J.F. Campbell, Integer programming formulation of discrete hub location problems, Eur. J. Oper. Res. (to appear).

  6. L. Cooper, Location-allocation problems, Oper. Res. 11(1963)331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. C.F. Daganzo, The distance traveled to visitN points with a maximum ofC stops per tour, Transp. Sci. 18(1984)331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. C.F. Daganzo, The break-bulk role of terminals in many-to-many logistic networks, Oper. Res. 35(1987)543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C.F. Daganzo, A comparison of in-vehicle and out-of-vehicle freight consolidation strategies, Transp. Res. 22B(1988)173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. C.F. Daganzo and G.F. Newell, Configuration of physical distribution networks, Networks 16(1986)113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Eilon, C.D.T. Watson-Gandy and N. Christofides,Distribution Management: Mathematical Modelling and Practical Analysis (Griffin, London 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A.M. Geoffrion, The purpose of mathematical programming is insight, not numbers, Interfaces 7(1976)81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A.M. Geoffrion, Making better use of optimization capability in distribution system planning, AIIE Trans. 11(1979)96.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S.L. Hakimi, Optimum locations of switching centers and the absolute centers and medians of a graph, Oper. Res. 12(1964)450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. R.W. Hall, Travel distance through transportation terminals on a rectangular grid, J. Oper. Res. Soc. 35(1984)1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R.W. Hall, Comparison of strategies for routing shipments through transportation terminals, Trans. Res. 21A(1987)421.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R.W. Hall and C.F. Daganzo, Travel distance through transportation terminals on a rectangular grid: Alternate routing strategies, General Motors Research Laboratories, Research Publication GMR-4719 (1984).

  18. A.F. Han, One-to-many distribution of nonstorable items: Approximate analytic models, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Kanagfani, Location models for off-airport terminals, Transp. Res. 6(1972)372.

    Google Scholar 

  20. G. Laporte, Location-routing problems, in:Vehicle Routing: Methods and Studies, ed. B.L. Golden and A.A. Assad (Elsevier Science, 1988).

  21. D.H. Marks and J.C. Liebman, Location model: A solid waste collection example, J. Urban Planning Dev. Div. 97(1971)15 (Proc. ASCE).

    Google Scholar 

  22. P.B. Mirchandani and A.R. Odoni, Locating new passenger facilities on a transportation network, Transp. Res. 13B(1979)113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. M.E. O'Kelly, A quadratic integer program for the location of interacting hub facilities, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 32(1987)393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. S.C. Wirasinghe and N.M. Waters, An approximate procedure for determining the number, capacities and locations of solid waste transfer-stations in an urban region, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 12(1983)105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Campbell, J.F. Location and allocation for distribution systems with transshipments and transportion economies of scale. Ann Oper Res 40, 77–99 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02060471

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02060471

Keywords

Navigation