Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Homograft valve durability: Host or donor influence?

  • Originals
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Antibiotic sterilized valves have been shown to function longer than those chemically sterilized; however, the reason remains obscure. Current hypotheses cite either retention of donor fibroblasts capable of repairing the grafted valve, or host fibroblast ingrowth into and onto the leaflet ground substance. A cryopreserved aortic homograft from a male donor was explanted from a female recipient after 10 months, and subjected to immunocyto-chemistry, tissue culture, and karyotyping. The leaflet bases exhibited normal morphology with an intact endothelium. The distal one-third of the leaflets was devoid of fibroblasts. Cytogenetic analysis of culture derived fibroblasts from the leaflet bases showed them to be of host origin. This homograft seems to have been implanted with an intact ground substance which allowed for host cell repopulation of the inner one-third of the leaflets. Perhaps donor cell viability in itself is not as important to durability as is preservation of the leaflet ground substance, but rather the presence of viable cells may be an index of the structural integrity of the collagen and elastic matrix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gonzalez-Lavin L, McGrath LB, Amini S, Graf D (1988) Homograft valve preparation and predicting viability at implantation. J Cardiac Surg 3 (Suppl): 309–312

    Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Janabi N, Gonzalez-Lavin L, Neirotti R, Ross DN (1972) Viability of fresh aortic valve homografts: A quantitative assessment. Thorax 27: 83

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. O'Brien MF, Johnston N, Stafford G, Gardner M, Pohlner P, McGiffin D, Brosman A, Duffy P (1988) A study of the cells in the replanted viable cryopreserved homograft valve. J Cardiac Surg 3 (Suppl): 279–287

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gavin JB, Barratt-Boyes BG, Hitchcock GC, Herdson PB (1973) The histopathology of “fresh” human aortic valve allografts. Thorax 28: 482

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barratt-Boyes BG (1979) Cardiothoracic surgery in the antiopodes including a report of a randomized trial of medical and surgical treatment of asymptomatic patients with severe coronary artery disease: a long-term follow-up of both fresh and antibiotic treated homograft valves and some observations on glutaraldehyde-preserved valve tissue. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 78: 804–822

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Moore CH, Mortelli V, Al-Janabi N, Ross DN (1975) Analysis of homograft valve failure in 311 patients followed up to 10 years. Ann Thorac Surg 20: 274–281

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hsu S, Raine L, Ganger H (1981) Use of avidin-biotinperoxidase complex (ABC) in immunoperoxidase techniques: A comparison between ABC and unlabelled antibody (PAP) procedures. J Histochem Cytochem 29: 577

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Seabright M (1971) A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet 2: 971

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gonzalez-Lavin L, Al-Janabi N, Ross D (1972) Long-term resutls after aortic valve replacement with preserved aortic homografts. Ann Thorac Surg 13: 594

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. van der Kamp A, Nauta J (1979) Fibroblast function and the maintenance of the aortic valve matrix. Cardiovasc Res 13: 167

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reichenbach D, Mohri H, Sands M, Merendino K (1971) Viability of connective tissue cells following storage of aortic valve leaflets. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 62: 690

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mohri H, Reichenbach D, Barnes R, Merendino K (1968) Homologous aortic valve transplantation. Alterations in viable and nonviable valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 56: 767

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wheatley D, McGregor C (1977) Post implantation viability in canine allograft heart valves. Cardiovasc Res 11: 78

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Duran C, Whitehead R (1966) Experimental homologous aortic valve transplantation: A comparison between fresh and freeze-dried grafts. Br J Surg 53: 1049

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Angell W, Shumway N, Kosek J (1922) A five-year study of viable aortic valve homografts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 64: 329

    Google Scholar 

  16. Susuki A, Mackrell J, Kay E (1970) Mitral valve replacement with transplant valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 60: 13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wheatley D, McGregor C (1977) Influence of viability on canine allograft structure and function. Cardiovasc Res 11: 223

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jeong U, Khan A, Fine G, Folgert GM Jr, Gonzalez-Lavin L (1976) Degenerative changes in aortic root allografts placed in the right ventricular outflow tract of growing puppies. Thorax 31: 757

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. O'Brien M, Strafford E, Gardner M, Pohlner PG, McGiffin DC (1987) A comparison of aortic valve replacement with viable cryopreserved and fresh allograft valves with a note on chromosomal studies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 94: 812

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gavin J, Barratt-Boyes B, Hitchcock G, Herdson P (1973) Histopathology of fresh human aortic valve allografts. Thorax 28: 482

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gavin J, Herdson P, Barratt-Boyes B (1972) The pathology of chemically sterilized human heart valve allografts. Pathology 4: 175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Armiger L, Gavin J, Barratt-Boyes B (1983) Histological assessment of orthotopic aortic valve leaflet allografts: Its role in selecting graft pretreatment. Pathology 15: 67

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Aparicio S, Donnelly R, Dexter F, Watson D (1975) Light and electron microscopy studies on homograft and heterograft heart valves. J Pathol 115: 147

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hammon J, O'Sullivan M, Oury J, Fosburg R (1974) Allograft cardiac valves. A view through the scanning electron microscope. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 68: 352

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Innes B, Thomson N, Ayers W (1969) Postmortem changes in endothelial cells of aortic valve homografts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 58: 416

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gonzalez-Lavin, L., Spotnitz, A.J., Mackenzie, J.W. et al. Homograft valve durability: Host or donor influence?. Heart Vessels 5, 102–106 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02058326

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02058326

Key words

Navigation