Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment of puborectalis syndrome with progressive anal dilation

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to assess the ability of progressive anal dilations to improve frequency of spontaneous bowel movements in patients with puborectalis syndrome (PRS). METHOD: Thirteen patients (9 females and 4 males; mean age, 37 years) with severe, chronic constipation caused by PRS were treated with daily, progressive anal dilation for a three-month period. Three dilators of 20, 23, and 27 mm in diameter were used. Dilators were inserted every day for 30 minutes (10 minutes each dilator). Patients were evaluated with anorectal manometry and defecography halfway through treatment, at the end of treatment, and six months after the end of treatment. At six months, patients also underwent physical examination. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement of weekly mean spontaneous bowel movements from zero to six (P <0.0001), and the need for laxatives decreased from 12 patients with a weekly mean of 4.6 to 2 patients once per week (P < 0.001). Enemas used before treatment by eight patients who had a weekly mean of 2.3 were, after treatment, needed only by three patients once per week (P <0.01). During straining, tone measured with anorectal manometry decreased from 93 to 62 mmHg after six months of the end of therapy (F =6.97; P<0.01), and anorectal angle measured with defecography during the strain increased from 95° to 110° (P =not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Daily progressive anal dilation should be considered as the first and most simple therapeutic approach in patients with PRS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ger G-C, Wexner SD, Jorge JM, Salanga VD. Anorectal manometry in the diagnosis of paradoxical puborectalis syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:816–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Corman ML. Colon and rectal surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1993:262–92.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Durthie GS, Bartolo DC. Anismus: the cause of constipation? Results of investigation and treatment. World J Surg 1992;16:831–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hallan RI, Williams NS, Melling J, Weldron DJ, Wormack NR, Morrison JF. Treatment of anismus in intractable constipation with botulinum A toxin. Lancet 1988;2:714–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jones PN, Lubowski DZ, Swash M, Henry MM. Is paradoxical contraction of puborectalis muscle of functional importance? Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:667–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuijpers HG, Bleijenberg G. The spastic pelvic floor syndrome: a cause of constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:669–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Loening-Baucke V. Modulation of abnormal defecation dynamics by biofeedback treatment in chronically constipated children with encopresis. J Pediatr 1990;116:214–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maria G, Anastasio G, Brisinda G, Liberatore E, Civello IM. Severe chronic constipation: our experience concerning diagnostic examinations. Coloproctology 1995;17:105–10.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Meunier P. Rectoanal dyssynergia in constipated children. Dig Dis Sci 1985;30:784–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Preston DM, Lennard-Jones JE. Severe constipation of young women: idiophatic slow transit constipation. Gut 1986;27:41–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wasserman IF. Puborectalis syndrome (rectal stenosis due to anorectal spasm). Dis Colon Rectum 1964;7:87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yoshioka K, Keighley MR. Randomized trial comparing anorectal myectomy and controlled anal dilatation for outlet obstruction. Br J Surg 1987;74:1125–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Whitead WF, Chaussade S, Corazziari E, Kumar D. Report of an international workshop on management of constipation. Gastroenterol Int 1991;4:99–113.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pinho M, Yoshioka K, Keighley MR. Long term results of anorectal myectomy for chronic constipation. Br J Surg 1989;76:1163–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Barnes PR, Hawley PR, Preston DM, Lennard Jones JE. Experience of posterior division of the puborectalis muscle in the management of chronic constipation. Br J Surg 1985;72:475–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. van Baal JG, Leguit P Jr, Brummelkamp WH. Relaxation biofeedback conditioning as treatment of a disturbed defecation reflex: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:187–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Weber J, Ducrotte Ph, Touchais JY, Roussignol C, Denis Ph. Biofeedback training for constipation in adults and children. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:844–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wexner SD, Cheepe JD, Jorge JM, Heymen J, Jagelman DG. Prospective assessment of biofeedback for the treatment of paradoxical puborectalis contraction. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:145–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bottini G, Maria G, Mattana C, Anastasio G, Pescatori M. Il dilatatore anale nella terapia conservativa della ragade. Riv Ital Colonproct 1990;9:61–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Maria, G., Anastasio, G., Brisinda, G. et al. Treatment of puborectalis syndrome with progressive anal dilation. Dis Colon Rectum 40, 89–92 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055688

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055688

Key words

Navigation