Skip to main content
Log in

A prospective study of local recurrence after resection and low stapled anastomosis in 183 patients with rectal cancer

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Local recurrence is the most serious complication of anterior resection for rectal cancer, usually occurring during the first two years after surgery. Over a five-year period, from 1981 to 1986, 183 patients underwent anterior resection for rectal carcinoma at the Surgery Ward of the University of Ferrara. Patients were followed for two years postoperatively. All operations were performed with staplers and classified according to Dukes, with 43 cases of Dukes' A; 83 cases of Dukes' B; and 57 cases of Dukes' C. In the first 24 months after surgery, the tumor recurred locally in 44 of the 183 patients (24 percent. Dukes' stage, grading distal resection margin, and histopathologic differentiation of the distal rectal ring left in the stapler after anastomosis were assessed to determine a prognostic indicator for the recurrence of the tumor. The stage:recurrence ratio was as follows: A, 1 (2 percent); B, 21 (25 percent); and C, 22 (39 percent). The grading:recurrence ratio was: G1, 13∶51 (25 percent); G2, 24∶110 (22 percent); and G3, 7∶22 (32 percent). The ratio between distal rectal resection margin and recurrence was: 0 to 2 cm, 15∶27 (56 percent); 2 to 4 cm, 16∶74 (22 percent); and over 4 cm, 13∶82 (15 percent). Histopathologic examination of the distal rectal ring was negative for all patients. These data confirm the direct relationship between class and local recurrence and indicate histologic grade and distal resection margin as significant prognostic parameters only when interpreted in the light of staging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McDermott FT, Hughes ES, Phil E, Johnson WR, Price AB. Local recurrence after potentially curative resection for rectal cancer in a series of 1008 patients. Br J Surg 1985;72:34–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Phil E, Hughes ES, McDermott FT, Milne BJ, Price AB. Disease free survival and recurrence after resection of colorectal carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 1981;16:331–41.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tonak J, Gall FP, Hermanek P, Hager TH. Incidence of local recurrence after curative operations for cancer of the rectum. Aust NZ J Surg 1982;52:23–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kennedy HL, Langevin JM, Goldberg SM, et al. Recurrence following stapled coloproctostomy for carcinoma of the mid portion of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1985;160:513–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Beart RW Jr, Metzger PP, O'Connell MJ, Schutt AJ. Postoperative screening of patients with carcinoma of the colon. Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:585–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Williams NS. The rationale for preservation of the anal sphincter in patients with low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1984;71:575–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Welch JP, Donaldson GA. Detection and treatment of recurrent cancer of the colon and rectum. An J Surg 1978;135:505–11.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nilsson E, Gregersen NP, Hartuig B, Sjodahl R. Carcinoma of the colon and rectum: results of treatment in 284 cases. Acta Chir Scand 1984;150:177–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schiessel R, Wunderlich M, Herbst F. Local recurrence of colorectal cancer: effect of early detection and aggressive surgery. Br J Surg 1986;73:342–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Devereux DF, Dekers PJ. Contribution of pathologic margins and Dukes' stage to local recurrence in colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 1985;49:323–5.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lasson AL, Ekelund GR, Lindstrom CG. Recurrence risk after stapled anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Acta Chir Scand 1984;150:85–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Malcom AW, Perencevich NP, Olson RM, Hanley JA, Chaffey JT, Wilson RE. Analysis of recurrence patterns following curative resection for carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981;152:131–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nicholls RJ, Mason AY, Morson BC, Dixon AK, Fry IK. The clinical staging of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1982;69:404–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pheils MT, Chapuis PH, Newland RC, Colquhoun K. Local recurrence following curative resection for carcinoma of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:98–102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pollett WC, Nicholls RJ. The relationship between the extent of distal clearance and survival and local recurrence rate after curative anterior resection for carcinoma of the rectum. Am Surg 1983;198:159–63.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Williams NS, Dixon MF, Johnston D. Reappraisal of the 5-centimetre rule of distal excision for carcinoma of the rectum: a study of distal intramural and of patients' survival. Br J Surg 1983;70:150–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ohman U. Curative potential of EEA stapler in rectal carcinoma. Acta Chir Scand 1986;152:59–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Elliot MS, Todd IP, Nicholls RJ. Radical reconstructive surgery for poorly differentiated carcinoma of the mid rectum. Br J Surg 1982;69:273–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thomas GD, Dixon MF, Smeeton NC, Williams NS. Observed variation in the histological grading of rectal carcinoma. J Clin Pathol 1983;36:385–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McDermott F, Hughes E, Phil E, Milne BJ, Price A. Long-term results of restorative resection and total excision for carcinoma of the middle third of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1982;154:833–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Newland RC, Chapuis PH, Pheil MT, McPherson JG. The relationship of survival to staging and grading of colorectal carcinoma: a prospective study of 503 cases. Cancer 1981;47:1424–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wood CB, Dawson PM, Habib NA. The sialomucin content of colonic resection margins. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:260–1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Scott NA, Rainwater LM, Wieand HS, et al. The relative prognostic value of flow cytometric DNA analysis and conventional clinicopathologic criteria in patients with operable rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:513–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chang KJ, Enker WE, Melamed M. Influence of tumor cell DNA ploidy on the natural history of rectal cancer. Am J Surg 1987;153:184–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Rubbini, M., Vettorello, G.F., Guerrera, C. et al. A prospective study of local recurrence after resection and low stapled anastomosis in 183 patients with rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 33, 117–121 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055539

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055539

Key words

Navigation