Skip to main content
Log in

Afferent limb obstruction complicating ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Small-bowel obstruction is a common complication after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). Acute angulation of the afferent limb at the pouch inlet is the cause of obstruction in a subset of patients requiring laparotomy. METHODS: Patients were identified from the Lahey Clinic ileoanal pouch registry, a prospective computerized database of all patients who have undergone IPAA since 1980. Records of patients who were identified as having afferent limb obstruction as a cause of bowel obstruction after IPAA were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 567 patients had undergone total proctocolectomy and ileoanal J-pouch at time of the study. Of 122 patients with one or more episodes of obstruction after IPAA, 48 required operative intervention. Afferent limb obstruction was identified as the cause of obstruction in six patients (12 percent). The most common presentation was recurrent partial obstruction (4 of 6 patients). Contrast small-bowel series and enemas were suggestive of obstruction in four of six patients, the most consistent radiographic finding being small-bowel dilation to the level of the pouch inlet. All patients underwent laparotomy for unresolved obstruction. Intraoperatively, the afferent limb was found to be adherent posterior to the pouch, causing acute angulation at the pouch inlet. Rather than risk injury to the pouch or its mesentery, the obstruction was bypassed by side-to-side anastomosis of the afferent limb to the pouch (enteroenterostomy) in five of six patients. One patient underwent ileostomy only because of technical considerations. Two patients required re-exploration and pexy of the afferent limb to the pelvic sidewall (pouchopexy) to relieve recurrent afferent limb obstruction. CONCLUSION: Afferent limb obstruction should be suspected in patients with recurrent obstruction after IPAA. Bypass of the obstructed segment from distal ileum to the pouch is safe and effective treatment. Because of the risk of recurrent afferent limb angulation, concurrent pouchopexy should be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Becker JM, Raymond JL. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a single surgeon's experience with 100 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 1986;204:375–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen Z, McLeod RS, Stern H, Grant D, Nordren S. The pelvic pouch and ileoanal anastomosis procedure: surgical technique and initial results. Am J Surg 1985;150:601–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Francois Y, Dozois RR, Kelly KA,et al. Small intestinal obstruction complicating ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg 1989;209:46–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Galandiuk S, Pemberton JH, Tsao J, Ilstrup DM, Wolff BG. Delayed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: complications and functional results. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:755–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kelly KA, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG, Dozois RR. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Curr Probl Surg 1992;29:57–131.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marcello PW, Roberts PL, Schoetz DJ Jr, Coller JA, Murray JJ, Veidenheimer MC. Long-term results of the ileoanal pouch procedure. Arch Surg 1993;128:500–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McMullen K, Hicks TC, Ray JE, Gathright JB, Timmcke AE. Complications associated with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. World J Surg 1991;15:763–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miller JS, Ferguson CM, Amerson JR, Dobkin KA, McGarity WC. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: the Emory University experience. Am Surg 1991;57:89–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nicholls RJ. Restorative proctocolectomy with various types of reservoir. World J Surg 1987;11:751–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nicholls RJ, Holt SD, Lubowski DZ. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir: comparison of two-stagevs. three-stage procedures and analysis of factors that might affect outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:323–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pescatori M, Mattana C, Castagneto M. Clinical and functional results after restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1988;75:321–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schoetz DJ Jr, Coller JA, Veidenheimer MC. Can the pouch be saved? Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:671–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Taylor BM, Beart RW Jr, Dozois RR, Kelly KA, Wolff BG, Ilstrup DM. The endorectal ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: current clinical results. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:347–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tjandra JJ, Fazio VW. Complications of the ileoanal pouch. In: Mazier WP, Luchtefeld MA, Levien DH, Senagore AJ, eds. Surgery of the colon, rectum, and anus. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1995:893–903.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wexner SD, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. The ileoanal reservoir. Am J Surg 1990;159:178–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Marcello PW, Roberts PL, Schoetz DJ Jr, Coller JA, Murray JJ, Veidenheimer MC. Obstruction after ileal pouchanal anastomosis: a preventable complication? Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:1105–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Read, T.E., Schoetz, D.J., Marcello, P.W. et al. Afferent limb obstruction complicating ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 40, 566–569 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055380

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055380

Key words

Navigation