Skip to main content
Log in

Unremarkable contextualism: Dispositions in the Bohm theory

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One way to characterize dispositions is to take them to be reducible to categorical properties plus experimental arrangements. We argue that this view applied to Bohm 's ontological interpretation of quantum theory provides a good picture of the unremarkable nature of spin in that interpretation, and so explains how a simple realism of possessed values may be retained in the face of Kochen and Specker's theorem. With this in mind we discuss Redhead's influential analysis of Kochen and Specker's theorem which does nor appear to allow for the above view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Kochen and E. Specker,J. Math. Mech. 17, 59 (1967).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. J. S. Bell,Found. Phys. 12, 989 (1982), reprinted in Ref. 23. Page references in the text are from the latter.

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. M. L. G. Redhead,Incompleteness, Nonlocality and Realism, 2nd impression (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. C. van Fraassen,Quantum Mechanics (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Peres,Phys. Lett. A 151, 107 (1990).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. N. D. Mermin,Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3373 (1990).

    MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. D. H. Mellor,Philos. Rev. 83, 157 (1974), reprinted in D. H. Mellor,Matters of Metaphysics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991). Page references in the text are from the latter.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. L. Mackie,Truth, Probability and Paradox (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Margenau,Phys. Today 7, 6 (1954).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. W. Heisenberg,Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science (Harper and Row, New York, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. H. Mellor,The Matter of Chance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. R. Popper,Quantum Theory and The Schism in Physics (Hutchinson, London, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Bohm,Phys. Rev. 85, 166, 180 (1952).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. J. N. Butterfield,Br. J. Philos. Sci. 43, 41 (1992).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. C. Dewdney, G. Horton, M. M. Lam, Z. Malik, and M. Schmidt,Found. Phys. 22, (1992).

  16. D. Bohm, R. Schiller, and J. Tiomno.Suppl. Nuovo Cimento 1, 48 (1955).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. C. Dewdney, R. P. Holland, A. Kyprianidis, and J.-P. Vigier,Nature (London) 336, 536 (1988).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. J. S. Bell,Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447 (1966).

    MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. D. Albert and B. Loewer,Noûs 23, 169 (1989).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. D. Albert,Quantum Mechanics and Experience (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. R. Swift and R. Wright,J. Math. Phys. 21, 77 (1980).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. D. Bohm,Quantum Theory (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. S. Bell,Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  24. C. Dewdney,J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 25, 3615 (1992).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pagonis, C., Clifton, R. Unremarkable contextualism: Dispositions in the Bohm theory. Found Phys 25, 281–296 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055208

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055208

Keywords

Navigation