Skip to main content
Log in

Are archaeological bones similar to modern bones? An INAA assessment

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For more than a decade, archaeometrists have been analyzing archaeologically recovered human bones in an attempt to relate their trace element contents to diet. Although the problems of diagenesis have been recognized, the variable effects have been difficult to establish. In this paper, an assessment is made of the analytical reliability of the INAA determination of major and trace elements, using their short-lived radioisotopes in both regular and defatted modern cancellous bone, and in modern cortical bone. This modern bone information is then compared with analytical data for bones from Egyptian mummies ranging in age from ≈2000 to ≈3700 BP, and with normallyburied 11 th century French bones. Diagenetic effects may readily be detected by the measurement of elevated quantities of V, Mn, and Al in soil-contaminated bones. The Ca to P concentration ratios and the organic content may also be used to separate bone from diagenetically altered archaeological specimens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. BRÄTTER, D. GAWLIK, J. LAUSCH, U. RÖSICK, J. Radioanal. Chem., 37 (1977) 393.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. J. BATRA, D. K. BEWLEY, J. Radioanal. Chem., 16 (1973) 275.

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. TOOTS, M. R. VOORHIES, Science, 149 (1965) 149.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. B. SZPUNAR, J. B. LAMBERT, J. E. BUIKSTRA, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 48 (1978) 199.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. SILLEN, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 56 (1981) 137.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. J. SCHOENINGER, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 58 (1982) 37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. D. A. NELSON, N. J. SAUER, Amer. Antiquity, 49 (1984) 141.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. B. LAMBERT, S. V. SIMPSON, C. B. SZPUNAR, J. E. BUIKSTRA, Archaeometry, 26 (1984) 131.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. A. GEIDEL, MASCA Journal, 2 (1982) 13.

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. L. KLEPINGER, Ann. Rev. Anthropol., 13 (1984) 75.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. I. GILBERT Jr., In Hair, Trace Elements and Human Illness, ed. A. C. BROWN, R. G. CROUNSE, (Eds), Praeger Publishers, New York, 1980, p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. EDWARD, J. M. FOSSEY, L. YAFFE, J. Field Archaeol., 11 (1984) 39.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. C. A. ROTTLÄNDER, J. Arch. Science, 3 (1976) 83.

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. GATSCHKE, D. GAWLIK, J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem., 18 (1980) 403.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. D. BEHNE, J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem., 19 (1981) 115.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. G. C. GOODE, C. M. HOWARD, A. R. WILSON, V. PARSONS, Anal. Chim. Acta., 58 (1972) 363.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. D. GAWLIK, D. BEHNE, P. BRÄTTER, W. GATSCHKE, H. GESSNER, D. KRAFT, J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem., 20 (1982) 499.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. B. H. O'CONNOR, G. C. KERRIGAN, K. R. TAYLOR, P. D. MORRIS, C. R. WRIGHT, Arch. Environ. Health, 35 (1980) 21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. J. J. DOYLE, J. Animal Science, 49 (1979) 482.

    Google Scholar 

  20. W. GATSCHKE, D. GAWLIK, D. KRAFT, J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem., 18 (1980) 403.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hancock, R.G.V., Grynpas, M.D. & Alpert, B. Are archaeological bones similar to modern bones? An INAA assessment. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, Articles 110, 283–291 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055031

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055031

Keywords

Navigation