Skip to main content
Log in

Functional outcome after low anterior resection with low anastomosis for rectal cancer using the colonic J-pouch

Prospective randomized study for determination of optimum pouch size

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Functional outcome after low anterior resection with ultralow coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer is improved by construction of a colonic J-pouch vs. straight anastomosis. Optimum size of this pouch has yet to be determined. Therefore, we initiated a prospective, randomized trial using 5-cm and 10-cm pouches to determine this size. METHODS: Patients with tumors 5 to 10 cm from the anal verge were included in the study. Before a low anterior resection anastomosis was performed, patients were randomized to either a 5-cm J-pouch group (5-J group) or a 10-cm J-pouch group (10-J group). Functional assessments were performed one year postoperatively. Clinical functions were evaluated using a functional scoring system. Physiologic functions, such as sphincter and reservoir function, were evaluated by anorectal manometry and evacuation function by the balloon expulsion and saline evacuation tests. RESULTS: Forty patients among 43 randomized patients were assessed for functional outcome one year postoperatively (5-J group, n=20; 10-J group, n=20). The functional score was similar for the two groups, although reservoir function in the 5-J group was significantly less than in the 10-J group. Sphincter function was similar between the two groups. Evacuation function in the 5-J group was significantly superior to that in the 10-J group. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-cm J-pouch conferred adequate reservoir function without compromising evacuation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Paty PB, Enker WE, Cohen AM, Lauwers GY. Treatment of rectal cancer by low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis. Ann Surg 1994;219:365–73.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sun WM, Read NW, Katsinelos P, Donnelly TC, Shorthouse AJ. Anorectal function after restorative proctocolectomy and low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1994;81:280–4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lazorthes F, Fages P, Chiotasso P, Lemozy J, Bloom E. Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 1986;73:136–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Parc P, Tiret E, Frileux P, Moszkowski E, Loygue J. Resection and colo-anal anastomosis with colonic reservoir for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1986;73:139–41.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Drake DB, Pemberton JH, Beart RW Jr, Dozois RR, Wolff BG. Coloanal anastomosis in the management of benign and malignant rectal disease. Ann Surg 1987;206:600–5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nicholls RJ, Lubowski DZ, Donaldson DR. Comparison of colonic reservoir and straight colo-anal reconstruction after rectal excision. Br J Surg 1988;75:318–20.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kusunoki M, Shoji Y, Yanagi H,et al. Function after anoabdominal rectal resection and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1991;78:1434–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berger A, Tiret E, Parc R,et al. Excision of the rectum with colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the low and mid rectum. World J Surg 1992;16:470–7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pélissier EP, Blum D, Bachour A, Bosset JF. Functional results of coloanal anastomosis with reservoir. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:843–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leo E, Belli F, Baldini MT,et al. New perspective in the treatment of low rectal cancer: total rectal resection and coloendoanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37(Suppl):S62–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mortensen NJ, Ramirez JM, Takeuchi N, Smilgin Humphreys MM. Colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis after rectal excision for carcinoma: functional outcome. Br J Surg 1995;82:611–3.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Seow-Choen F, Goh HS. Prospective randomized trial comparing J colonic pouch-anal anastomosis and straight coloanal reconstruction. Br J Surg 1995;82:608–10.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Oritz H, De Miguel M, Armendáriz P, Rodriguez J, Chocarro C. Coloanal anastomosis: are functional results better with a pouch? Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:375–7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. UICC. TNM classification of malignant tumors. 4th ed (2nd revision). Tokyo: Springer-Verlag, 1992;52–5.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yasutomi M, Hida J. Functional results after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. In: Hojo K, ed. Archives of pelvic surgery for cancer. Tokyo: The Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare, 1994;10–2.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Japanese Research Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Multi-Institutional Registry of Large Bowel Cancer in Japan. 9 vols. Tochigi, Japan: Japanese Research Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, 1994;24–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported, in part, by a Grant-in-Aid for Cancer Research from the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science.

About this article

Cite this article

Hida, Ji., Yasutomi, M., Fujimoto, K. et al. Functional outcome after low anterior resection with low anastomosis for rectal cancer using the colonic J-pouch. Dis Colon Rectum 39, 986–991 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02054686

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02054686

Key words

Navigation