Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Anastomotic leak after double-stapled low colorectal resection

An analysis of risk factors

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Anastomotic leaks after double-stapled low anterior resection were associated with a number of factors related to patient condition, level of anastomosis, and variety of surgery-related and antitumor therapy-related factors. This retrospective analysis of a group of patients with consistent length of rectal stump was undertaken to determine the risk factors of anastomotic leak after low colorectal resection related to surgery and to intraperitoneal chemotherapy. METHODS: A group of 165 patients treated with surgery only, surgery with early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and surgery with hyperthermic intraoperative and early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. All patients underwent surgery that used the double-stapled technique with transection of the rectum through its middle third. In univariate and multivariate analysis, the relationship between anastomotic leak rate and extent of colon resection, length of residual colon, presence of left colon, and type of applied treatment was studied. RESULTS: With a full length of residual colon, leak rate was 1 percent but increased progressively with the extent of proximal colon resection. Removal of the left colon was associated with the 2.7 odds ratio for anastomotic disruption. Leak rate after surgery only was 6 percent; surgery with normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy was 5 percent; and surgery with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy was 20 percent. CONCLUSIONS: In this group of patients with consistent length of residual rectum, the incidence of anastomotic disruption was related to extent of proximal colon resection. Anastomotic integrity was not compromised by normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy was associated with high leak rate only when extensive resection of the colon was performed. Variables other than extent of rectal excision are important in causing a leak of colorectal anastomosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Knight CD, Griffen FD. An improved technique for low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapler. Surgery 1980;88:710–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beart RW, Kelly KA. Randomized prospective evaluation of the EEA stapler for colorectal anastomoses. Am J Surg 1981;141:143–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McGinn FP, Gartell PC, Clifford PC, Brunton FJ. Staples or sutures for low colorectal anastomoses: a prospective randomized trial. Br J Surg 1985;72:603–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Everett WG, Friend PJ, Forty J. Comparison of stapling and hand-suture for left-sided large bowel anastomosis. Br J Surg 1986;73:345–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moritz E, Achleitner D, Holbling N, Miller K, Speil T, Weber F. Single vs. double stapling technique in colorectal surgery: a prospective randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:495–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fingerhut A, Elhalad A, Hay JM. French Association for Surgical Research. Infraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis: hand-sewnversus circular staples. A controlled clinical trial. Surgery 1994;116:484–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Griffen FD, Knight CD, Knight CD Jr. Results of the double stapling procedure in pelvic surgery. World J Surg 1992;16:866–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Baran JJ, Goldstein SD, Resnik AM. A double-staple technique in colorectal anastomoses: a critical review. Am Surg 1992;58:270–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Arnaud JP, Casa C, Pousset JP, Bergamaschi R, Ronceray J. Double stapling technique for low colorectal anastomosis. Coloproctology 1992;14:214–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Redmond HP, Austin OM, Clery AP, Deasy JM. Safety of double-stapled anastomosis in low anterior resection. Br J Surg 1993;80:924–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heald RL, Karanjia ND. Mesenteric considerations for adequate resection. In: Wanebo H, ed. Colorectal cancer. St. Louis: Mosby, 1993:242–62.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bokey EL, Chapius PH, Fung C,et al. Postoperative morbidity and mortality following resection of the colon and rectum for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:480–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Irvin TT, Goligher JC. Aetiology of disruption of intestinal anastomoses. Br J Surg 1973;60:461–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schrock TR, Deveney CW, Dunphy JE. Factors contributing to leakage of colonic anastomoses. Ann Surg 1973;177:513–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Heald RJ, Leicester RJ. The low stapled anastomosis. Br J Surg 1981;68:333–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Burke ER, Welwaart K. Complications of stapled anastomoses in anterior resection for rectal carcinoma: colorectal anastomosisversus coloanal anastomosis. J Surg Oncol 1990;45:180–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sugarbaker PH, Graves T, DeBruijn EA,et al. Early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy as an adjuvant therapy to surgery for peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastrointestinal cancer: pharmacological studies. Cancer Res 1990;50:5790–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nordlinger B, Bouteloup PY, Favre JP,et al. Early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy is feasible and well tolerated in colon cancer: a prospective randomized study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1990;116:686.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Graf W, Westin JE, Pahlman L, Glimelius B. Adjuvant intraperitoneal 5-fluorouracil and intravenous leucovorin after colorectal cancer surgery: a randomized phase II placebo-controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 1994;9:35–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fiddan-Green RG. Splanchnic ischemia and multiple organ failure in the critically ill. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1988;70:128–34.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shime N, Lee M, Hatanaka T. Cardiovascular changes during continuous hypothermic peritoneal perfusion. Anesth Anaig 1994;78:938–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hamazoe R, Maeta M, Kaibara N. Intraperitoneal thermochemotherapy for prevention of peritoneal recurrence of gastric cancer. Cancer 1994;73:2048–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yonemura Y, Fujimura T, Fushida S,et al. Hyperthermo-chemotherapy combined with cytoreductive surgery for the treatment of gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination. World J Surg 1991;15:530–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yonemura Y, Ninomiya I, Kaji M,et al. Prophylaxis with intraoperative chemohyperthermia against peritoneal recurrence of serosal invasion-positive gastric cancer. World J Surg 1995;19:450–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fujimoto S, Takahashi M, Okui K. A prospective study on combined treatment of intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy and surgery for patients with refractory gastric cancer. In: Taguchi T, Aigner K, eds. Mitomycin C in cancer chemotherapy today. Tokyo: Excerpta Medica, 1991:105–18.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fujimoto S, Takahashi M, Endoh F,et al. A clinical pilot study combining surgery with intraoperative pelvic hyperthermochemotherapy to prevent local recurrence of rectal cancer. Ann Surg 1991;213:43–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yamaguchi A, Tsukioka Y, Fushida S,et al. Intraperitoneal hyperthermic treatment for peritoneal dissemination of colorectal cancers. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:964–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schneebaum S, Lange MK, Arnold MW,et al. Intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion for recurrent colorectal cancer—feasibility study. Reg Cancer Treat 1992;4:277–81.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jacquet P, Sugarbaker PH. Clinical research methodologies in diagnosis and staging of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. In: Sugarbaker PH, ed. Peritoneal carcinomatosis: principles of management. Norwell: Kluwer Academic, 1996;359–74.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sugarbaker PH. Peritonectomy procedures. Ann Surg 1995;221:29–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sugarbaker PH. Progressive release of the left colon for a tension free colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. In: Sugarbaker PH, ed. Peritoneal carcinomatosis: principles of management. Norwell: Kluwer Academic, 1996;255–61.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sugarbaker PH. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for treatment and prevention of peritoneal carcinomatosis and sarcomatosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37(Suppl):S115–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Graf W, Ivarsson M, Gerdin B, Hellsing K, Pahlman M, Glimelius B. The influence of early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy on human wound healing. J Surg Res 1994;57:394–400.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. de Roy van Zuidewijn DB, Hendriks T, Wobbes T, de Boer HH. Intraperitoneal cytostatics impair healing of experimental intestinal anastomoses. Br J Cancer 1991;63:937–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hillan K, Nordlinger B, Ballet F, Puts JP, Infante R. The healing of colonic anastomoses after early intraperitoneal chemotherapy: an experimental study in rats. J Surg Res 1988;44:166–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Shimizu T, Maeta M, Koga S. Influence of local hyperthermia on the healing of small intestinal anastomoses in the rat. Br J Surg 19991;78:57–9.

  37. Burkitt DS, Donovan IA. Intraluminal pressure adjacent to left colonic anastomoses. Br J Surg 1990;77:1288–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Williamson ME, Lewis WG, Finan PJ, Miller AS, Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D. Recovery of physiologic and clinical function after low anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma: myth or reality. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:411–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Washington Cancer Institute, The Washington Hospital Center, Washington, D.C.

    Andrew M. Averbach M.D., David Chang M.S., Patricia Koslowe Ph.D. & Paul H. Sugarbaker M.D.

Authors
  1. Andrew M. Averbach M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Chang M.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Patricia Koslowe Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Paul H. Sugarbaker M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Averbach, A.M., Chang, D., Koslowe, P. et al. Anastomotic leak after double-stapled low colorectal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 39, 780–787 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02054444

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02054444

Key words

Search

Navigation