Skip to main content
Log in

Use or misuse of colostomy to heal pressure ulcers

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of colostomy performed as an adjunct measure in the attempt to heal pressure ulcers by flap closure. METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients who underwent colostomy for healing of pressure ulcers were studied by chart review and patient questionnaire. Fecal diversion was accomplished by colostomy in each case. RESULTS: There were four (15 percent) deaths. Twenty-three patients subsequently underwent flap closure of their ulcer. Of 19 patients available for follow-up, only 6 (32 percent) patients had completely healed, although most patients thought their quality of life improved because of the colostomy. None of the patients underwent colostomy closure. CONCLUSION: Our conclusions are that, although most patients will have an improved quality of life subsequent to diversion, the high mortality and low rate of pressure ulcer healing should temper enthusiasm for performing colostomy in this setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shea JD. Pressure sores: classification and management. Clin Orthop 1975;112:89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brandeis GH, Morris JN, Nash DJ, Lipsitz LA. The epidemiology and natural history of pressure ulcers in elderly nursing home residents. JAMA 1990;264:2905–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bergstrom N, Branden B. A prospective study of pressure sore risk among institutionalized elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992;40:747–58.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bejany DE, Chao C, Perito PE, Politano VA. Continent urinary diversion and diverting colostomy in the therapy of non-healing pressure sores in paraplegic patients. Paraplegia 1993;31:242–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stone JM, Wolfe VA, Nino-Murcia M, Perkash I. Colostomy as treatment for complications of spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990;71:514–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frisbie JH, Tun CG, Nguyen CH. Effect of enterostomy on quality of life in spinal cord injury patients. J Am Paraplegia Soc 1986;9:3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Saltzstein RJ, Romano J. The efficacy of colostomy as a bowel management alternative in selected spinal cord injury patients. J Am Paraplegia Soc 1990;13:9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Abrams BL, Alsikafi FH, Waterman NG. Colostomy: a new look at morbidity and mortality. Am Surg 1979;45:462–4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wara P, Sorensen K, Berg V. Proximal fecal diversion: review of 10 years experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:114–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Miles RM, Greene RS. Review of colostomy in a community hospital. Am Surg 1983;49:182–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Deshmukh, G.R., Barkel, D.C., Sevo, D. et al. Use or misuse of colostomy to heal pressure ulcers. Dis Colon Rectum 39, 737–738 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02054436

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02054436

Key words

Navigation