Abstract
PURPOSE: The authors evaluate the effectiveness of routine colonoscopy and marker evaluation in diagnosis of intraluminal recurrent cancer. METHODS: Chart review was conducted on 481 patients who underwent curative resection for colorectal cancer between 1980 and 1990. Clinical visits were scheduled and carcinoembryonic antigen evaluation was performed every three months, and colonoscopy was performed preoperatively, 12 to 15 months after surgical treatment, and then with intervals of 12 to 24 months or when symptoms appeared. RESULTS: About 10 percent of patients developed intraluminal recurrences. More than one-half of metachronous lesions arose within the first 24 months, and median time to diagnosis was 25 months. Patients with left-sited tumors in the advanced stage had a higher risk of developing recurrent intraluminal disease. Twenty-nine patients underwent a second surgical operation, of which 17 cases were radical. In this group, the five-year survival was 70.6 percent, although no nonradically treated or nonresected patients survived longer than 31 months. Twenty-two patients were asymptomatic at time of diagnosis of recurrence, and of these, 12 patients underwent radical operation; on the other hand, of the 24 symptomatic patients, only 5 were treated radically. Carcinoembryonic antigen was the first sign of recurrence in eight cases. Colonoscopy must be performed within the first 12 to 15 months after operation, whereas an interval of 24 months between examinations seems sufficient to guarantee early detection of metachronous lesions. CONCLUSION: Serial tumor marker evaluation is of help in earlier diagnosis of local recurrences. Asymptomatic patients more frequently undergo another operation for cure and thus have a better survival rate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barillari P, Ramacciato G, De Angelis R,et al. Effect of preoperative colonoscopy on the incidence of synchronous and metachronous neoplasms. Acta Chir Scand 1990;156:163–6.
Carlsson G, Petrelli JN, Nava H, Herrera L, Mittelman A. The value of colonoscopic surveillance after curative resection for colorectal cancer or synchronous adenomatous polyps. Arch Surg 1987;122:1261–3.
Carlsson G, Petrelli JN, Nava H, Herrera L, Mittelman A. Endoscopic surveillance of patients following curative resection for colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 1988;38:80–2.
Evers BM, Mullins RJ, Matthews TH, Broghamer WL, Polk HC Jr. Multiple adenocarcinomas of the colon and rectum: an analysis of incidence and current trends. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:518–22.
Kiefer PJ, Thorson AG, Christensen MA. Metachronous colorectal cancer: time interval to presentation of a metachronous cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:378–82.
Lee TK, Barringer M, Meyers T, Sterchi JM. Multiple primary carcinomas of the colon and associated extracolonic primary malignant tumors. Ann Surg 1982;195:501–7.
Luchtefeld MA, Ross DS, Zander JD, Folse JR. Late development of metachronous colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:180–4.
Berge I, Ekelund C, Mellner BP. Carcinoma of the colon and rectum in a defined population: an epidemiological clinical and post mortem investigation of colorectal cancer and coexisting polyps in Malmo Sweden. Acta Chir Scand 1972;438:1–86.
Lautenbach E, Forde K, Neugut A. Benefits of colonoscopy surveillance after curative resection of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 1994;220:206–11.
Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Stulc JP, Davidson B, Petrelli NJ. Prognostic significance of anastomotic recurrence from colorectal adenocarcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:838–42.
Byrd RL, Boggs HW Jr, Slagle GW, Cole PA. Reliability of colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:1023–5.
Fowler DL, Hedberg SE. Follow-up colonoscopy after polypectomy [abstract. Gastrointest Endosc 1980;19:655–9.
Holtzman R, Poulard JB, Bank S,et al. Repeat colonoscopy after endoscopic polypectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:185–8.
Isler JT, Brown PC, Lewis FG, Billingham RP. The role of preoperative colonoscopy in colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:435–9.
Reilly JC, Rusin LC, Theuerkauf FJ Jr. Colonoscopy: its role in cancer of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:532–8.
Juhl G, Larson MG, Mullins R, Bond S, Polk CH. Six-year results of annual colonoscopy after resection of colorectal cancer. World J Surg 1990;14:255–61.
Williams CB, Hunt RH, Loose H, Riddel RH, Sakay Y, Swarbit ET. Colonoscopy in the management of colon polyps. Br J Surg 1974;61:673–82.
Woolfson IK, Eckholdt GJ, Wetzel CR,et al. Usefulness of performing colonoscopy one year after endoscopic polypectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:389–93.
Pagana TJ, Ledesma ES, Mittelman A, Nava HR. The use of colonoscopy in the study of synchronous colorectal neoplasms. Cancer 1984;53:356–9.
Dasmahapatra KS, Lopyan K. Rationale for agressive colonoscopy in patients with colorectal neoplasia. Arch Surg 1989;124:63–6.
Larson MG, Bond JS, Shallcross C, Mullins R, Polk CH. Colonoscopy after curative resection of colorectal cancer. Arch Surg 1986;121:535–40.
Barkin JS, Cohen ME, Flaxman M,et al. Value of a routine follow-up endoscopy program for the detection of recurrent colorectal carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol 1988;88:1355–60.
Buhler H, Seefeld U, Deyle P,et al. Endoscopic follow-up after colorectal cancer surgery. Cancer 1984;54:791–3.
Barillari P, Bolognese A, Chirletti P, Cardi M, Sammartino P, Stipa V. Role of CEA, TPA, and Ca 1:9-9 in the early detection of localized and diffuse recurrent rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:471–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Barillari, P., Ramacciato, G., Manetti, G. et al. Surveillance of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 39, 388–393 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02054052
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02054052