Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent pressures to decrease the cost of medical care have mandated preoperative outpatient bowel preparation (OBP) for elective colorectal surgery without any data documenting equivalent quality of care. This study examined the safety and efficacy of OBP compared with inpatient bowel preparation (IBP). METHODS: Records of all patients who underwent OBP for elective colorectal resection since the inception of the OBP program from July 1993 to June 1994 were compared with records of all patients who received IBP for elective procedures from January to June 1993. RESULTS: The two groups, 90 patients who underwent OBP and 98 patient who had IBP, were well matched for age, sex, diagnosis, and operations performed. The OBP group had a shorter length of hospital stay (median, 7 vs. 9 days; P < 0.0001; chi-squared analysis), whereas the complication rate was similar (19 percent in the OBP group vs. 18 percent in the IBP group), including infectious complications (10 percent in the OBP group vs. 7 percent in the IBP group). Although operating time was similar (mean, 199 vs. 213 minutes) and estimated blood loss (mean, 528 vs. 536 ml), the OBP group had significantly higher perioperative fluid requirements: intraoperative fluids (median, 4300 vs. 3700 ml; P < 0.05; Student's t-test), intraoperative colloid administration (48 vs. 29 percent; P < 0.0002; chi-squared), 24-hour postoperative fluids (3224 vs. 2700 ml; P < 0.0001; Student's t-test), and postoperative fluid challenges (50 vs. 20 percent; P <0.0001; chi-squared analysis). CONCLUSION: Outpatient bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery is safe and effective. It offers shorter hospital stay, and, therefore, potentially reduces medical care cost. Patients with multiple medical problems may not tolerate extensive fluid shifts; therefore, other preoperative arrangements, such as inpatient or outpatient intravenous fluid therapy, need to be considered to minimize complications that may outweigh potential cost savings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Davis GR, Santa Ana CA, Morawski SG, Fordtran JS. Development of a lavage solution associated with minimal water and electrolyte absorption or secretion. Gastroenterology 1980;78:991–5.
Takada H, Ambrose NS, Galbraith K, Alexander-Williams J, Keighley MR. Quantitative appraisal of Picolax (sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate) in the preparation of the large bowel for elective surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:679–83.
Wolff BG, Beart RW Jr, Dozois RR,et al. A new bowel preparation for elective colon and rectal surgery: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Arch Surg 1988;123:895–900.
Wolters U, Keller HW, Sorgatz S, Raab A, Pichlmaier H. Prospective randomized study of preoperative bowel cleansing for patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 1994;81:598–600.
Fleites RA, Marshall JB, Eckhauser ML, Mansour EG, Imbembo AL, McCullough AJ. The efficacy of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution versus traditional mechanical bowel preparation for elective colonic surgery: a randomized, prospective, blinded clinical trial. Surgery 1985;98:708–17.
Dueholm S, Rubinstein E, Reipurth G. Preparation for elective colorectal surgery: a randomized, blinded comparison between oral colonic lavage and whole-gut irrigation. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:360–4.
Cohen SM, Wexner SD, Binderow SR,et al. Prospective, randomized, endoscopic-blinded trial comparing precolonoscopy bowel cleansing methods. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:689–96.
Marshall JB, Pineda JJ, Barthel JS, King PD. Prospective, randomized trial comparing sodium phosphate solution with polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 1993;39:631–4.
Børkje B, Pedersen R, Lund GM, Enehaug JS, Berstad A. Effectiveness and acceptability of three bowel cleansing regimens. Scand J Gastroenterol 1991;26:162–6.
Bartlett JG, Condon RE, Gorbach SL, Clarke JS, Nichols RL, Ochi S. Veterans Administration cooperative study on bowel preparation for elective colorectal operations: impact of oral antibiotic regimen on colonic flora, wound irrigation cultures and bacteriology of septic complications. Ann Surg 1978;188:249–54.
Clarke JS, Condon RE, Bartlett JG, Gorbach SL, Nichols RL, Ochi S. Preoperative oral antibiotics reduce septic complications of colon operations: results of prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study. Ann Surg 1977;186:251–9.
Levy AG, Benson JW, Hewlett EL, Herdt JR, Doppman JL, Gordon RS. Saline lavage: a rapid, effective, and acceptable method of cleansing the gastrointestinal tract. Gastroenterology 1976;70:157–61.
Handelsman JC, Zeiler S, Coleman J, Dooley W, Walrath JM. Experience with ambulatory preoperative bowel preparation at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Arch Surg 1993;128:441–4.
Frazee RC, Roberts J, Symmonds R, Snyder S, Hendricks J, Smith R. Prospective, randomized trial of inpatientvs. outpatient bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:223–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, E.C., Roberts, P.L., Taranto, R. et al. Inpatientvs. outpatient bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 39, 369–373 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02054048
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02054048