Abstract
PURPOSE: Radiographic imaging of dynamic changes within the pelvic cavity and rectum during evacuation has been recognized as a valuable method of assessment. This study was designed to assess the incidence and clinical significance of defecographic findings in patients with possible evacuation disorders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All defecographic studies were reviewed by a single colorectal surgeon familiar with patients' histories and physical findings. RESULTS: Between July 1988 and July 1995, 744 patients (566 females and 178 males) with a mean age of 63.5 (range, 12–95) years had defecographic and proctographic examination. Four hundred forty-six (60 percent) patients were diagnosed who complained of constipation, 123 (16.5 percent) of fecal incontinence, 42 (5.6 percent) of rectal prolapse, 82 (11 percent) of rectal pain, and 51 (6.9 percent) had a combination of more than one of these diagnoses. Although 93 (12.5 percent) of these evaluations were considered normal, 61 (8 percent) revealed rectal prolapse, 191 (25.7 percent) rectocele, 82 (11 percent) sigmoidocele, and 94 (12.6 percent) intussusception; in 223 (30 percent) patients, a combination of these findings was noted. Patients with paradoxical puborectalis contraction had an extremely high frequency of constipation compared with other symptoms ( P <0.0001). CONCLUSION: Defecography can reveal abnormalities in the majority of patients with evacuatory disorders. There was a high incidence of rectocele, sigmoidocele, and intussusception. Care must be taken not to treat patients strictly based on radiographic findings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wallden L. Defecation block in cases of deep rectogenital pouch. Acta Chir Scand 1952;165:1–22.
Brodén B, Snellman B. Procidentia of the rectum studied with cineradiography: a contribution to the discussion of causative mechanism. Dis Colon Rectum 1968;11:330–47.
Jorge JM, Ger GC, Gonzalez L, Wexner SD. Patient positioning during cinedefecography: influence on perineal descent and other measurements. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:927–31.
Jorge JM, Wexner SD, Ger GC, Salanga VD, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG. Cinedefecography and electromyography in the diagnosis of nonrelaxing puborectalis syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:668–76.
Jorge JM, Yang Y-K, Wexner SD. Incidence and clinical significance of sigmoidoceles as determined by a new classification system. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1112–7.
Johansson C, Ihre T, Ahlback SO. Disturbances in the defecation mechanism with special reference to intussusception of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:920–4.
Felt-Bersma RJ, Luth WJ, Janssen JJ, Meuwissen SG. Defecography in patients with anorectal disorders: which findings are clinically relevant? Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:277–84.
Piccirillo MF, Teoh TA, Yoon KS, Patina-Paul RA, Lucas J, Wexner SD. Rectoceles: the incidence and clinical significance. Techniques in Coloproctology (in press).
Ger G-C, Wexner SD, Jorge JM, Salanga VD. Anorectal manometry in the diagnosis of paradoxical puborectalis syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:816–25.
Felt-Bersma RJ, Strijers RL, Janssen JJ, Visser SL, Meuwissen SG. The external anal sphincter: relationship between anal manometry and anal electromyography and its clinical relevance. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:112–6.
Wexner SD, Jorge JM. Colorectal physiologic tests: use or abuse of technology? Eur J Surg 1994;160:167–74.
Mahieu P, Pringot J, Bodart P. Defecography II: contribution to the diagnosis of defecation disorders. Gastrointest Radiol 1984;9:253–61.
Ekberg O, Nylander G, Fork FT. Defecography. Radiology 1985;155:45–8.
Mellgren A, Bremmer S, Johansson C,et al. Defecography: results of investigations in 2,816 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1133–41.
Finlay IG, Bartolo DC, Bartram CI,et al. Proctography (symposium). Int J Colorectal Dis 1988;3:67–9.
Wexner SD. Rectal prolapse and intussusception. In: Beck DE, Welling D, eds. Manual of patient care in colorectal surgery. Boston: Little, Brown, 1991:191–212.
Shorvan PJ, McHugh S, Somers S, Stevenson GW. Defecography findings in young healthy volunteers. Gut 1987;28A:1361–2.
Johansen OB, Wexner SD, Daniel N, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG. Perineal rectosigmoidectomy in the elderly. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:767–72.
Agachan F, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. Anorectal physiology in the rectal prolapse patient. Techniques in Coloproctology (in press).
Williams JG, Rothenberger DA, Madoff RD, Goldberg SM. Treatment of rectal prolapse in the elderly by perineal rectosigmoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:830–4.
Parks AG, Porter NH, Hardcastle J. The syndrome of the descending perineum. J R Soc Med 1966;59:477–82.
Yoshioka K, Matsui Y, Yamada O,et al. Physiologic and anatomic assessment of patients with rectocele. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:704–8.
Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. Biofeedback for nonrelaxing puborectalis syndrome. Semin Colon Rectal Surg 1992;2:120–4.
Kuijpers JH, Bleijenberg G. Assessment and treatment of obstructed defecation. Ann Med 1990;22:405–11.
Robinson BA, Gibbons IS. Paradoxical external sphincter function in fecal retention with soiling and its control by operant conditioning. Gastroenterology 1976;70:A72.
Johansson C, Ihre T, Holström B, Nordström E, Dolk A, Broden G. A combined electromyographic and cineradiologic investigation in patients with defecation disorders. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:1009–13.
Miller R, Duthie GS, Bartolo DC,et al. Anismus in patients with normal and low transit constipation. Br J Surg 1991;78:690–2.
Rutter KR. Electromyographic changes in certain pelvic floor abnormalities. J R Soc Med 1974;67:53–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Agachan, F., Pfeifer, J. & Wexner, S.D. Defecography and proctography. Dis Colon Rectum 39, 899–905 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02053989
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02053989