Skip to main content
Log in

Immediatevs. Salvage resection after local treatment for early rectal cancer

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is an increasing awareness of local procedures to treat early stage rectal cancer. Abdominoperineal resection (APR) or low anterior resection (LAR) has been recommended if adverse pathologic findings are encountered in the local excision specimen. No data compare the impact on survival of “immediate” resection for adverse featuresvs. “salvage” resection for clinical recurrence. METHODS: We reviewed retrospectively 155 patients who underwent initial curative treatment of invasive rectal cancer by excision (91), snare-cautery (44), and fulguration (20). RESULTS: Twenty-one patients underwent APR/LAR immediately after initial local treatment, whereas another 21 patients underwent salvage APR/LAR for local recurrence. The disease-free survival after APR/LAR was 94.1 percent for the immediate group and 55.5 percent for the delayed group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: This decreased survival observed after delayed resection supports the recommendation for immediate APR/LAR when adverse pathologic features are present in the excision specimen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fisher B, Redmond C, Poisson R,et al. Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1989;320:822–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brennan MF. Management of extremity soft-tissue sarcoma. Am J Surg 1989;158:71–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Madden JL, Kandalkraft S. Electrocoagulation in the treatment of cancer of the rectum: a continuing study. Ann Surg 1971;174:530–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Localio SA, Eng K, Coppa GF. Abdominosacral resection for midrectal cancer. Ann Surg 1983;198:320–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Morson BC, Bussey HJ, Samoorian S. Policy of local excision for early cancer of the colorectum. Gut 1977;18:1045–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mason AY. Trans-sphincteric approach to rectal lesions. Surg Annu 1977;9:171–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hager TH, Gall FP, Hermanek P. Local excision of cancer of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:149–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stearns MW, Sternberg SS, DeCosse JJ. Treatment alternatives: localized rectal cancer. Cancer 1984;54:2691–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Biggers OR, Beart RW, Ilstrup DM. Local excision of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:374–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gall FP, Hermanek P. Cancer of the rectum-local excision. Surg Clin North Am 1988;68:1353–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Whiteway J, Nicholls RJ, Morson BC. The role of surgical local excision in the treatment of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1985;72:694–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. DeCosse JJ, Wong RJ, Quan SH,et al. Conservative treatment of distal rectal cancer by local excision. Cancer 1989;63:219–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Graham RA, Garnsey L, Jessup JM. Local excision of rectal carcinoma. AmJ Surg 1990;160:306–12.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ellis LM, Mendenhall WM, Bland KI, Copeland EM. Local excision and radiation therapy for early rectal cancer. Am Surg 1988;54:217–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marks G, Mohiuddin MM, Masoni L, Pecchioli L. Highdose radiation and full-thickness local excision. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:735–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Minsky BD, Cohen AM, Enker WE, Mies C. Sphincter preservation in rectal cancer by local excision and postoperative radiation therapy. Cancer 1991;67:908–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jessup JM, Bothe A, Stone MD,et al. Preservation of sphincter function in rectal carcinoma by a multimodality treatment approach. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 1992;1:137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ota DM, Skibber J, Rich TA. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience with local excision and multimodality therapy for rectal cancer. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 1992;1:147–152.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Enker WE. Preservation of male potency following pelvic dissection for rectal cancer. Arch Surg 1992;127:1396–1402.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dershaw D, Enker WE, Cohen AM, Sigurdson ER. Transrectal ultrasonography of rectal carcinoma. Cancer 1990;66:2336–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Milsom JW, Graffner H. Intrarectal ultrasonography in rectal cancer staging and in the evaluation of pelvic disease. Ann Surg 1990;212:602–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Alexander AA. The effect of endorectal ultrasound scanning on the preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 1992;1:39–56

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Baron, P.L., Enker, W.E., Zakowski, M.F. et al. Immediatevs. Salvage resection after local treatment for early rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 38, 177–181 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02052447

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02052447

Key words

Navigation