Skip to main content
Log in

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis function following childbirth

An extended evaluation

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Women undergoing Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) are frequently within reproductive years and eager to bear children. Management issues have been raised regarding the effects of pregnancy and delivery on the pouch, particularly with respect to obstetric care. Our experience is updated to search for delayed sequelae of pregnancy and delivery and to establish whether other factors have an adverse effect on pouch function. These results are also compared with the outcome of pregnancy and delivery in patients with ileostomy or Kock pouch. METHODS: Records of 43 women who had a successful pregnancy and delivery following IPAA were reviewed, including 8 women who had more than 1 pregnancy. RESULTS: Pregnancy was generally well tolerated, with complications being managed nonoperatively. Stool frequency (P<0.01), incontinence (P<0.01), and pad usage (P<0.05; sign rank test) were significantly increased during pregnancy, but prepregnancy function was restored following delivery. Vaginal delivery, multiple births, length of labor, and birth weight had no adverse permanent effect on subsequent pouch function. Longer follow-up after vaginal delivery (mean, 2.4 years) demonstrated no compromise of pouch function. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of pouch-related complications in patients with IPAA compares favorably with incidence in patients with ileostomy or Kock pouch. Operative rate for complications was 0 percent in IPAA patients compared with 9 percent in patients with ileostomy and 19 percent in patients with Kock pouch. The cesarean section rate was higher in patients with IPAA than in those with ileostomy or Kock pouch, and this may be caused by uncertainty about how to manage delivery in patients with IPAA. Pregnancy and childbirth are well tolerated in women with IPAA, with a lower complication rate and a higher cesarean section rate than women with ileostomy or Kock pouch. Type of delivery should be influenced by obstetric considerations, with vaginal delivery avoided in patients with a noncompliant, rigid perineum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barnes CS, Hayes HM. Ulcerative colitis complicating pregnancy and the puerperium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1931;22:907–12.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sorokin JJ, Levin SM. Pregnancy and inflammatory bowel disease: a review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol 1983;62:247–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jamerot G. Fertility, sterility and pregnancy in chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 1982;17:1–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zeldis JB. Pregnancy and inflammatory bowel disease. West J Med 1989;151:168–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson JB, Turner GM, Williamson RC. Fulminant ulcerative colitis in late pregnancy and the puerperium. J R Soc Med 1987;80:492–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Scudamore HH, Rogers AG, Bargen JA, Banner EA. Pregnancy after ileostomy for chronic ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 1957;32:295–303.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McEwan HP. Pregnancy in patients with surgically treated ulcerative colitis. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonwealth 1965;72:450–1.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Priest FO, Gilchrist RK, Long JS. Pregnancy in the patient with ileostomy and colectomy. JAMA 1959;169:213–5.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Barwin BN, Harley J, Wilson W. Ileostomy and pregnancy. Br J Clin Pract 1974;28:256–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gopal KA, Amshel AL, Shonberg IL, Levinson BA, Van Wert M, Van Wert J. Ostomy and pregnancy. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:912–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ojerskog B, Kock NG, Philipson BM, Philipson M. Pregnancy and delivery in patients with a continent ileostomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1988;167:61–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kelly KA, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG, Dozois RR. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Curr Probl Surg 1992;29:59–131.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pezim ME. Successful childbirth after restorative proctocolectomy with pelvic ileal reservoir. Br J Surg 1984;71:292.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Metcalf A, Dozois RR, Beart RW, Wolff BG. Pregnancy following ileal pouch anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:859–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nelson H, Dozois RR, Kelly KA, Malkasian GD, Wolff BG, Ilstrup DM. The effect of pregnancy and delivery on the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:384–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pemberton JH, Phillips SF, Ready RR, Zinsmeister AR, Beahrs OH. Quality of life after Brooke ileostomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: comparison of performance status. Ann Surg 1989;209:620–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, San Francisco, California, June 7 to 12, 1992.

About this article

Cite this article

Juhasz, E.S., Fozard, B., Dozois, R.R. et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis function following childbirth. Dis Colon Rectum 38, 159–165 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02052444

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02052444

Key words

Navigation