Skip to main content
Log in

Bilateral gluteoplasty for fecal incontinence

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study describes our clinical experience with adynamic bilateral gluteoplasty in 20 patients with total fecal incontinence, in whom a sphincter repair had failed (n=17) or was nonviable. METHODS: Between 1986 and 1995, 12 women and 8 men ranging in age from 15 to 58 (mean, 37) years underwent different techniques of adynamic gluteoplasty. The indications for the operation were congenital anomalies, denervation, or sphincter destruction. Postoperative evaluation was clinical (Pescatori grading; self-evaluation) and manometric. RESULTS: Morbidity was only related to wound infection (n=7) requiring late reoperations for neosphincter repair (n=5), anal stenosis (n=2), and incisional hernia after colostomy closure (n= 1). Two other patients with no complications also had further surgery for tightening of the neosphincter; they had a successful outcome. Of the 17 evaluable patients, 9 (53 percent) achieved normal control or were graded as Pescatori A-1, A-2, B-1, or C-1, 1 (6 percent) as Pescatori C-2, and 7 (41 percent) as Pescatori C-3. Six patients (35 percent) judged their results as excellent, three (18 percent) as good, one (6 percent) as fair, and seven (41 percent) as bad. Eight patients are able to retain 200 ml of water instilled into the rectum for between five minutes and two hours. For the nine patients with better results, the mean ± standard deviation of the differences between postgluteoplasty and pregluteoplasty anal pressures were 40±25 mmHg (resting pressure) and 122±85 mmHg (squeeze pressure). These findings demonstrate a tonic and voluntary activity of the plasty. The author's technique has less morbidity, and excellent or good results were achieved in 67 percent of the patients. Failures were attributable to suture disruption (n=4), poor muscular contraction (n=2), and intractable constipation (n=1). CONCLUSIONS: Adynamic gluteoplasty is efficient for achieving good or very good continence status in a higher proportion of patients than with other adynamic muscle transfer procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Devesa JM, Vicente E, Enríquez JM,et al. Total fecal incontinence—a new method of gluteus maximus transposition: preliminary results and report of previous experience with similar procedures. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:339–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pearl RK, Prasad ML, Nelson RL, Orsay CP, Abcarian H. Bilateral gluteus maximus transposition for anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:478–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baeten CGM, Konsten J, Spaans F,et al. Dynamic graciloplasty for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet 1991;338:1163–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Williams NS, Hallan RI, Koeze TH,et al. Construction of a neoanal sphincter by transposition of the gracilis muscle and prolonged neuromuscular stimulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1990;72:108–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Christiansen J, Sorensen M, Rasmussen O. Gracilis muscle transposition for fecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1990;77:1039–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yoshioka K, Keighley MR. Clinical and manometric assessment of gracilis muscle transplant for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:767–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chetwood CH. Plastic operation for restoration of the sphincter ani with report of a case. Med Rec 1902;61:529.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schoemaker J. Un nouveau procèdè opèratoire pour la reconstitution du sphincter anal. Sem Med 1909;29:160.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Biström O. Plastiches erzatz des M. sphincter ami. Acta Chir Scand 1944;90:431–48.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hentz VR. Construction of a rectal sphincter using the origin of the gluteus maximus muscle. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982;70:82–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pescatori M, Anastasio G, Bottini C, Mentasti A. New grading and scoring for anal incontinence: evaluation of 335 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:482–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Christiansen J, Ronholt Hansen C, Rasmussen O. Bilateral gluteus maximus transposition for anal incontinence. Br J Surg 1995;82:903–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Seattle, Washington, June 9 to 14, 1996.

About this article

Cite this article

Devesa, J.M., Madrid, J.M.F., Gallego, B.R. et al. Bilateral gluteoplasty for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 40, 883–888 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02051193

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02051193

Key words

Navigation