Skip to main content
Log in

Complication of the intracolonic bypass

Report of a case

  • Case Reports
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

The intracolonic bypass has been used both experimentally and clinically to avoid high-risk primary colonic anastomosis in the face of peritonitis. Experimental and clinical data have established the Coloshield ® as safe, with few clinical complications reported. This is a review of the literature and a case report of a complication of an intracolonic bypass that was found to have eroded through the colon in the early postoperative period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Classen JN, Bonardi R, O'Mara CS, Finney DC, Sterioff S. Surgical treatment of acute diverticulitis by staged procedures. Ann Surg 1976;184:582–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Krukowski ZH, Matheson NA. Emergency surgery for diverticular disease complicated by generalized fecal peritonitis: a review. Br J Surg 1984;71:921–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Killingback M. Management of perforated diverticulitis. Surg Clin North Am 1983;63:97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Knox AJ, Birkett FD, Collins CO. Closure of colostomy. Br J Surg 1971;58:669.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dolan PA, Caldwell FT, Thompson CH, Westbrook KC. Problems of colostomy closure. Am J Surg 1979;137:188–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ravo B, Ger R. Intracolonic bypass by an intraluminal tube: an experimental study. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:360–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ger R, Ravo B. Prevention and treatment of intestinal dehiscence by an intraluminal bypass graft. Br J Surg 1984;71:726–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ravo B, Ger R. Temporary colostomy—an outmoded procedure? A report on the intracolonic bypass. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:904–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ravo B, Mishrick A, Addie K,et al. The treatment of perforated diverticulitis by one-stage intracolonic bypass procedure. Surgery 1987;102:771–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ravo B, Ger R. A preliminary report on the intracolonic bypass as an alternative to a temporary colostomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1984;159:541–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dinnick T. The origins and evolution of colostomy. Br J Surg 1934;22:142–54.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mayo WJ, Wilson LA, Griffin MZ. Acquired diverticulitis of the large colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1907;5:8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smithwick RH. Experiences with surgical management of diverticulitis of sigmoid. Ann Surg 1942;115:969–85.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sanderson ER. Henri Hartmann and the Hartmann operation. Arch Surg 1980;115:792–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rege RV, Nahrwold DC. Diverticular disease. Curr Probl Surg 1989;177–88.

  16. Eisenstat TE, Rubin RJ, Salvati EP. Surgical management of diverticulitis: the role of the Hartmann procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:429–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fraser I. An historical perspective on mechanical aids in intestinal anastomosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1982;155:566–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ross H. The effect of an intraluminal tube used as an internal drain on the healing of the rat colon. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:591–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Egozi, L., Sorrento, J.J., Golub, R. et al. Complication of the intracolonic bypass. Dis Colon Rectum 36, 191–193 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02051178

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02051178

Key words

Navigation