Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical conundrum of solitary rectal ulcer

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

A retrospective study of 80 patients with biopsy-proven solitary rectal ulcer (SRU) was conducted to review its clinical spectrum. The median follow-up was 25 months. The female-to-male ratio was 1.4∶1.0, and the mean age was 48.7 years (range, 14–76 years). Principal symptoms were bowel disturbances (74 percent) and rectal bleeding (56 percent). Twenty-one patients (26 percent) were asymptomatic and required no treatment. A previous “wrong” diagnosis was made in 25 percent. Rectal prolapse was identified in 28 percent (full-thickness, 15 percent; mucosal, 13 percent). The macroscopic appearance of the lesion seen in SRU varied widely and included polypoid lesions in 44 percent (the predominant finding in the asymptomatic group), ulcerated lesions in 29 percent (always symptomatic), and edematous, nonulcerated, hyperemic mucosa in 27 percent. Anorectal manometry provided little helpful information in the patients in whom it was performed. Management by bulk laxatives and bowel retraining led to symptomatic improvement in 19 percent of cases. In 29 percent of cases, symptoms persisted despite endoscopic healing of the lesion. Intractability of symptoms led to surgery in only 27 (34 percent) patients. Depending on the presence or absence of rectal prolapse, rectopexy or a conservative local procedure (such as local excision), respectively, appeared to be the optimal surgical treatment. The polypoid variety tended to respond to therapy more favorably than non-polypoid varieties. Thus, the macroscopic appearance of SRU has a significant bearing on the clinical course, and most cases do not require surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cruveilhier J. Ulcere chronique du rectum. Anatomie pathologique du corps humain. Paris: JB Bailliere, 1829.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lloyd Davies OV. Quoted by Rutter KR. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. J R Soc Med 1975;68:22–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Madigan MR, Morson BC. Solitary ulcer of the rectum. Gut 1969;10:871–81.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rutter KR, Riddell RH. The solitary ulcer syndrome of the rectum. Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol 1975;4:505–30.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stavorovsky M, Weintroub S, Ratan J, Rozen P. Successful treatment of a benign solitary rectal ulcer by temporary diverting sigmoidostomy: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 1977;20:347–50.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goodall HB, Sinclair IS. Colitis cystica profunda. J Pathol 1957;73:33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Levine DS. “Solitary” rectal ulcer syndrome. Gastroenterology 1987;92:243–53.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Allen MS. Hamartomatous inverted polyps of the rectum. Cancer 1966;19:257–65.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Talerman A. Enterogenous cysts of the rectum. Br J Surg 1971;58:643–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ford MJ, Anderson JR, Gilmour HM, Holt S, Sircus W, Heading RC. Clinical spectrum of “solitary ulcer” of the rectum. Gastroenterology 1983;84:1533–40.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kennedy DK, Hughes SR, Masterton JP. The natural history of benign ulcer of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1977;144:718–20.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Keighley MR, Shouler P. Clinical and manometric features of the solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:507–12.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Martin CJ, Parks TG, Biggart JD. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in Northern Ireland 1971–1980. Br J Surg 1981;68:744–7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. White CM, Findlay JM, Price JJ. The occult rectal prolapse syndrome. Br J Surg 1980;67:528–30.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Womack NR, William NS, Holmfield JH, Morrison JF. Pressure and prolapse—the cause of solitary rectal ulceration. Gut 1987;28:1228–33.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sun WM, Read NW, Donnelly T, Bannister JJ, Shorthouse AJ. A common pathophysiology for full thickness rectal prolapse, anterior mucosal prolapse and solitary rectal ulcer. Br J Surg 1989;76:290–5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Madigan MR. Solitary ulcer of the rectum. J R Soc Med 1964;57:403.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nicholls RJ, Simson JN. Anteroposterior rectopexy in the treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome without overt rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1986;73:222–4.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dough JH, Wright FF. Acute and chronic benign ulcers of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981;153:398–400.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wasserman IF. Puborectalis syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 1964;7:87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stuart M. Proctitis cystica profunda: incidence, etiology, and treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:153–6.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mackle EJ, Manton Mills JO, Parks TG. The investigation of anorectal dysfunction in the solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Int J Colorectal Dis 1990;5:21–4.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Britto E, Borges AM, Swaroop VS, Jagannath P, DeSouza LJ. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Twenty cases seen at an oncology center. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:381–5.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Niv Y, Bat L. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome—clinical, endoscopic and histological spectrum. Am J Gastroenterol 1986;81:486–91.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Snooks SJ, Nicholls RJ, Henry MM, Swash M. Electrophysiologic and manometric assessment of the pelvic floor in the solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Br J Surg 1985;72:131–3.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Epstein SE, Ascari WQ, Ablow RC, Seaman WB, Lattes R. Colitis cystica profunda. Am J Clin Pathol 1966;45:186–201.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Boston, Massachusetts, May 12 to 17, 1991.

About this article

Cite this article

Tjandra, J.J., Fazio, V.W., Church, J.M. et al. Clinical conundrum of solitary rectal ulcer. Dis Colon Rectum 35, 227–234 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02051012

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02051012

Key words

Navigation