Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of an omental wrap on the healing and vascularity of compromised intestinal anastomoses

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Adult Wistar rats were used to investigate the ability of an omental wrap to limit leakage from compromised intestinal anastomoses. Under ketamine anesthesia, a section of small bowel was divided and then reanastomosed using a “control” anastomosis, a “deficient” anastomosis, or an “ischemic” anastomosis, plus or minus the addition of a wrap of omentum. Initially 10 rats were randomly assigned to each group. Nineteen of the 20 rats with unwrapped compromised anastomoses died within six weeks, compared with five deaths in the rats protected by an omental wrap (Fisher's exact test;P < 0.01). The experiment was then repeated with a sample of rats from each anastomotic group being sacrificed for histologic examination on days 2 to 7, 10, 14, and 42. At the time of sacrifice a dye was injected into the omental vasculature to determine its contribution to the healing anastomosis. An anastomosis could be demonstrated between omental and bowel wall vessels by the third postoperative day. At one week the infarcted bowel edges were being resorbed and the omentum formed a fibrotic cylinder aligning the separated ends of bowel wall. At six weeks the scar became more contracted and the bowel mucosa had started to grow onto its luminal surface. It is concluded from this study that the omental wrap is protective to a compromised anastomosis by providing a biologically viable plug to prevent early leakage and a source of granulation tissue and neovasculature for later wound repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bennett WH. A case of perforating gastric ulcer in which the opening, being otherwise intractable, was closed by means of an omental plug: recovery. Lancet 1896;2:310–1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Walters W. An omental flap in transperitoneal repair of recurring vesicovaginal fistulas. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1937;64:74–5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wilkie DP. Some functions and surgical uses of the omentum. BMJ 1911;2:1103–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fabian TC, Stone HH. Arrest of severe liver hemorrhage by an omental pack. South Med J 1980;73:1487–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dupont C, Menard Y. Transposition of the greater omentum for reconstruction of the chest wall. Plast Reconstr Surg 1972;49:263–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Turner-Warwick R. The use of the omental pedicle graft in urinary tract reconstruction. J Urol 1976;1116:341–7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goldsmith HS, Beattie EJ. Protection of vascular prostheses following radical inguinal excisions. Surg Clin North Am 1969;49:413–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldsmith HS. Protection of low rectal anastomosis with intact omentum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1977;144:584–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lanter B, Mason R. Use of omental pedicle graft to protect low anterior colonic anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1979;22:448–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldsmith HS, Kiely AA, Randall HT. Protection of intrathoracic oesophageal anastomoses by omentum. Surgery 1968;63:464–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McLachlin AD, Denton DW. Omental protection of omental anastomoses. Am J Surg 1972;125:134–40.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Katsikas D, Sechas M, Antypas G,et al. Beneficial effect of omental wrapping of unsafe intestinal anastomoses. Int Surg 1977;62;8:435–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Carter DC, Jenkins DHR, Whitfield HN. Omental reinforcement of intestinal anastomoses. Br J Surg 1972;59;2:129–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gulati SM, Thusoo TK, Kakar A, Iyenger B, Pandey KK. Comparative study of free omental, peritoneal, dacron velour and marlex mesh reinforcement of large bowel anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25;6:517–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ravitch MM, Brolin R, Kolter J, Yap S. Studies in the healing of intestinal anastomoses. World J Surg 1981;5:627–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ellis H. The aetiology of post-operative abdominal adhesions. Br J Surg 1962;50:10–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eliska O. Blood flow in the revascularised kidney. Revascularisation by means of omentum and an iliac loop. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1968;9:342–7.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Goldsmith HS, Chen WF, Duckett S. Prevention of cerebral infarction in the dog by intact omentum. Am J Surg 1975;130:317–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. De Renzi E, Boeri G. Isolated spleen tissue revascularised by the greater omentum. Ber Klin Wochenschr 1903;40:773–5.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chalmers PJ, Newing RK. Influence of omental transposition on experimental tumours. J Surg Oncol 1986;32:135–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cartier R, Brunette I, Hashimoto K, Bourne WM, Schaff HV. Angiogenic factor: a possible mechanism for neovascularisation produced by omental pedicles. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;99:264–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tisinai K, Shedd F, Harris R,et al. Comparison of growth, neovascularisation and enzymatic function of fetal intestinal grafts in the omentum and renal capsule. J Pediatr Surg 1990;25:914–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilkie DPD. Some functions and surgical uses of the omentum. BMJ 1911;2:1103–6.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dudgeon IS, Ross A. Experiments on the great omentum. Am J Med Sci 1906;132:37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Walker FC, Rogers AW. The greater omentum as a site of antibody synthesis. Br J Exp Pathol 1961;42:222–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Davis CB. Free transplantation of the omentum subcutaneously and within the abdomen. JAMA 1917;68:705–6.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Goldsmith HS, Kiely AA, Randall HT. Protection of intrathoracic oesophageal anastomoses by omentum. Surgery 1968;63:464–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lanter B, Mason RA. Use of omental pedicle graft to protect low anterior colonic anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1979;22:448–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Goldsmith HS. Protection of low rectal anastomosis with intact omentum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1977;144:584–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Goligher JC, Graham NG, De Dombal FT. Anastomotic dehiscence after anterior resection of rectum and sigmoid. Br J Surg 1970;57:109–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. McLachlin AD, Olsson LS, Pitt DF. Anterior anastomosis of the rectosigmoid colon: an experimental study. Surgery 1976;80:306–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Adams, W., Ctercteko, G. & Bilous, M. Effect of an omental wrap on the healing and vascularity of compromised intestinal anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum 35, 731–738 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050320

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050320

Key words

Navigation