Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Correlation of nuclear morphometry and DNA ploidy in rectal cancer

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Several investigators have used morphometric measurements to determine differences in the nuclear size and shape of normal and neoplastic colorectal tissue. Changes in nuclear morphometric parameters have also been shown to correlate with prognosis in a variety of noncolorectal cancers. The association of nuclear morphometry with prognostic indicators in rectal cancer has not been well studied. Measurements of the nuclear area, perimeter, longest cord, and circularity factor from 39 primary rectal adenocarcinomas were compared with DNA content, degree of tumor differentiation, Dukes' class, and patient survival. Nuclear circularity was found to correlate with DNA ploidy. Nondiploid tumors with a DNA index greater than 1.3 had significantly more circular nuclei than tumors with diploid or near-diploid DNA content. There was no correlation between nuclear morphometry and Dukes' class or patient survival. Significant increases in DNA content of rectal cancers appear to be reflected by measurable changes in nuclear shape. Nuclear morphometric measurements may provide useful information in the study of the progression of neoplastic changes in colorectal cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hamilton PW, Allen DC, Watt PC,et al. Classification of normal colorectal mucosa and adenocarcinoma by morphometry. Histopathology 1987;11:901–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sato E, Goto M, Nakamura T. Nuclear ultrastructure in carcinoma, adenoma, Peutz-Jeghers polyp and dysplasia of the large bowel: a morphometric analysis. Gann 1981;72:245–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nakamura K, Nakaya T, Sato E, Sasano N. Ultramorphometry of the nucleus of human rectal cancer compared with normal mucosal gland. Tohoku J Exp Med 1974;112:177–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Baak JP, Van Dop H, Kurver PH, Hermans J. The value of morphometry to classic prognosticators in breast cancer. Cancer 1985;56:374–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tosi P, Luzi P, Baak JP,et al. Nuclear morphometry as an important prognostic factor in stage I renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 1986;58:2512–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Baak JP, Fox H, Langley FA, Buckley CH. The prognostic value of morphometry in ovarian epithelial tumors of borderline malignancy. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1985;4:186–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ooms EC, Essed E, Veldhuizen RW,et al. The prognostic significance of morphometry in T1 bladder tumours. Histopathology 1981;5:311–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Diamond DA, Berry SJ, Jewett HJ,et al. A new method to assess metastatic potential of human prostate cancer: relative nuclear roundness. J Urol 1982;128:729–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ambros RA, Trost RC, Campbell AY, Lambert WC. Prognostic value of morphometry in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Hum Pathol 1989;20:215–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wolley RC, Schreiber K, Koss LG,et al. DNA distribution in human colon carcinomas and its relationship to clinical behaviour. J Natl Cancer Inst 1982;69:15–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schutte B, Reynders MM, Wiggers T,et al. Retrospective analysis of the prognostic significance of DNA content and proliferative activity in large bowel carcinoma. Cancer Res 1987;47:5494–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Armitage NC, Robias RA, Evans DF,et al. The influence of tumour cell DNA abnormalities on survival in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 1985;72:828–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kokal W, Sheibani K, Terz J, Harada R. Tumour DNA content in the prognosis of colorectal carcinoma. JAMA 1986;255:3123–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Heimann TM, Martinelli G, Szporn A,et al. Prognostic significance of DNA content abnormalities in young patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 1989;210:792–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Quirke P, Dixon MF, Clayden AD,et al. Prognostic significance of DNA aneuploidy and cell proliferation in rectal adenocarcinomas. J Pathol 1987;151:285–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Marchevsky AM, Gil J. Applications of computerized interactive morphometry in pathology. II. A model for computer generated diagnosis. Lab Invest 1986;54:708–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gil J, Marchevsky AM, Silage DA. Applications of computerized interactive morphometry in pathology. I. Tracings and generation of graphic standards. Lab Invest 1986;54:222–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Marchevsky AM, Gil J, Jeanty H. Computerized interactive morphometry in pathology: current instrumentation and methods. Hum Pathol 1987;18:320–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hedley DW, Friedlander ML, Taylor IW,et al. Method for analysis of cellular DNA content of paraffin-embedded pathology material using flow cytometry. J Histochem Cytochem 1983;31:1333–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Durrant LG, Robins RA, Armitage NC,et al. Association of antigen expression and DNA ploidy in human colorectal tumors. Cancer Res 1986;46:3543–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Banner BF, Tomas de La Vega JE, Roseman DL,et al. Should flow cytometric DNA analysis precede definitive surgery for colon carcinoma? Ann Surg 1985;202:740–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hiddeman W, von Bassewitz DB, Kleinermeier HJ,et al. DNA stem line heterogeneity in colorectal cancer. Cancer 1986;58:258–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tribukait B, Hammarberg C, Rubio C. Ploidy and proliferation patterns in colorectal adenocarcinomas related to Dukes' classification and to histopathological differentiation. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand [A] 1983;91:89–95.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schwartz D, Banner BF, Roseman DL, Coon JS. Origin of multiple primary colon carcinomas: a retrospective flow cytometric study. Cancer 1986;58:2082–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Quirke P, Dyson JE, Dixon MF,et al. Heterogeneity of colorectal adenocarcinomas evaluated by flow cytometry and histopathology. Br J Cancer 1985;51:99–106.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jones DJ, Moore M, Schofield PF. Prognostic significance of DNA ploidy in colorectal cancer: a prospective flow cytometric study. BrJ Surg 1988;75:28–33.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery and Pathology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine of The City University of New York, New York, New York

    Tomas M. Heimann M.D., Russell D. Cohen M.D., Arnold Szporn M.D. & Joan Gil M.D.

Authors
  1. Tomas M. Heimann M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Russell D. Cohen M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Arnold Szporn M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Joan Gil M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Heimann, T.M., Cohen, R.D., Szporn, A. et al. Correlation of nuclear morphometry and DNA ploidy in rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 34, 449–454 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02049927

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02049927

Key words

Search

Navigation