Skip to main content
Log in

Nerve-sparing surgery in 302 resectable rectosigmoid cancer patients: Genitourinary morbidity and 10-year survival

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate 5-year and 10-year disease-free survival, urinary dysfunction, and sexual activity after nerve-sparing radical surgery, including lumboaortic lymphadenectomy for rectosigmoid cancer. METHODS: Since 1980 to 1992, 302 consecutive patients affected with rectal (188) or sigmoid (114) resectable cancer underwent radical surgery. Lumboaortic lymphadenectomy was routinely performed and total mesorectal dissection was always accomplished in rectal cancer. Splanchnic nerves, superior hypogastric plexus, hypogastric nerves, and sacral parasympathetic nerves were sought, identified, and preserved or, when necessary, unilaterally sacrificed. Fifty-three (17.6 percent) patients were classified Dukes A, 145 (48.0 percent) B, 46 (15.2 percent) C1, and 17 (5.6 percent) C2. Thirtynine (12.9 percent) patients were Dukes D. In 85 rectal cancer patients, tumor was located at the lower third. Eighty-six of 210 Dukes B and C patients were submitted to systemic chemotherapy and/or high-dose pelvic radiotherapy. RESULTS: The actuarial 5-year disease-free survival was 58.5 percent in rectal and 65.7 percent in sigmoid cancer patients, median follow-up time was 47 months. During the follow-up, each patient was interviewed about sexual activity and urinary dysfunction and a questionnaire was filled out. Urinary dysfunction was not frequently observed, while a definitive sexual impotence was reported in 27.6 percent of the patients. The age under 60 years and sphincter-saving surgery were demonstrated as significantly contributing to retaining a satisfactory sexual activity. CONCLUSIONS: Unexpectedly high disease-free survival was observed in the Dukes C2 subgroup. It allows us to hypothesize that lumboaortic lymphadenectomy could remove neoplastic microfoci present at this level in those patients, enhancing surgical chances of cure. The majority of male patients under 60 years old can retain a satisfactory sexual activity after undergoing a nerve-sparing sphincter-saving cancer surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heald RJ. Function-preserving rectal surgery (Letter). Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:627–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Quirke P, Dixon MF, Durdey P, Williams NS. Local recurrence of rectal cancer due to inadequate resection. Lancet 1986;2:996–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gerard A, Buyse M, Nordlinger B,et al. Preoperative radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment in rectal cancer. Ann Surg 1988;208:606–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stockholm Rectal Cancer Study Group. Short-term preoperative radiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Am J Clin Oncol 1987;10:369–75.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jones DJ, Zaloudik J, James RD, Haboubi N, Moore M, Schofield PF. Predicting local recurrence of the rectum after preoperative radiotherapy and surgery. Br J Surg 1989;76:1172–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Reis Neto JA, Quilici FA, Reis JA Jr. A comparison of nonoperativevs. preoperative radiotherapy in rectal carcinoma: a 10-year randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:702–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zybina MA, Nabatich NN. Results of combination treatment for rectal cancer. Vestn Khir 1975;114:67–70.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dedkov IP, Zybina MA. Intensive preoperative gammatherapy in combined treatment of cancer of the rectum. Am J Proctol 1976;7:43–7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Simbertseva LP, Sneshko LL, Smirnov NM. Results of intensive combined therapy for cancer of the rectum. Vop Onkol 1975;21:7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Enker WE. Potency, cure, and local control in the operative treatment of rectal cancer. Arch Surg 1992;127:1396–1402.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hojo F, Sawada T, Moriya Y. An analysis of survival and voiding, sexual function after wide iliopelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with carcinoma of the rectum, compared with conventional lymphadenectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:128–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Enker WE, Meilweil ML, Hertz RE,et al. En bloc pelvic lymphadenectomy and sphincter preservation in the surgical management of rectal cancer. Ann Surg 1985;203:426–33.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Moriya Y, Hojo K, Sawada T, Koyama Y. Significance of lateral node dissection for advanced rectal carcinoma at or below the peritoneal reflection. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:307–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cavaliere R, Tedesco M, Giannarelli D,et al. Radical surgery in rectal cancer patients: what does it mean today? J Surg Oncol 1991;2(Suppl):24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dukes CE. The classification of cancer of the rectum. J Pathol Bacteriol 1932;35:323–32.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gabriel WB, Dukes CE, Bussey HJ. Lymphatic spread in cancer of the rectum. Br J Surg 1935;23:395–413.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Glass RE, Ritchie JK, Thompson HR, Mann CV. The results of surgical treatment of cancer of the rectum by radical resection and extended abdomino-iliac lymphadenectomy. Br J Surg 1985;72:599–601.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kirkegaard P, Hjortrup A, Sanders S. Bladder dysfunction after low anterior resection for mid-rectal cancer. Am J Surg 1981;141:266–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kinn A-C, Öhman U. Bladder and sexual function after surgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:43–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Danzi M, Ferulano GP, Abate S, Califano G. Male sexual function after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:665–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Koukouras D, Spiliotis J, Scopa D,et al. Radical consequence in the sexuality of male patients operated for colorectal carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 1991;17:285–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Williams JT, Slack WW. A prospective study of sexual function after major colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 1980;67:772–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Cosimelli, M., Mannella, E., Giannarelli, D. et al. Nerve-sparing surgery in 302 resectable rectosigmoid cancer patients: Genitourinary morbidity and 10-year survival. Dis Colon Rectum 37 (Suppl 2), S42–S46 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02048430

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02048430

Key words

Navigation