Abstract
PURPOSE: The majority of recent American articles on management of colon trauma promote liberal use of primary repair. The extent to which Canadian surgeons have embraced such recommendations is unknown. METHOD: To determine the current attitude of Canadian surgeons toward the use of primary repair, we surveyed the members of The Canadian Association of General Surgeons regarding their management of three fictitious cases of penetrating and blunt colon trauma. RESULTS: Three hundred seventeen members of The Canadian Association of General Surgeons responded. Ninety-two percent managed a fictitious case of early, uncontaminated stab wounds by primary repair. Delay in treatment or fecal contamination was associated with a significantly reduced number of respondents choosing primary repair (P <0.001).Surgeons were less likely to choose primary repair for management of a case of blunt colon injury (35 percent;P <0.001), and only 25 percent considered primary repair an option for a case of low velocity bullet wounds; 2 percent chose it for high velocity bullet wounds. Overall, the most common response to colon trauma scenarios was colostomy. However, 96 percent of respondents selected primary repair as the treatment of choice for at least one clinical situation depicted in the questionnaire. The likelihood of choosing primary repair was independent of surgeons' experiences or the level of the surgeons' trauma center. CONCLUSIONS: Although there are still settings in which many Canadian surgeons consider colostomy the appropriate treatment for colon injuries, primary repair has definitely established a foothold in all levels of Canadian general surgery practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ogilvie WH. Abdominal wounds in the western desert. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1944;78:225–38.
Office of the Surgeon General. Circular Letter No. 178, October 28, 1943.
Stone HH, George SM Jr, Fabian TC. Management of perforating colon trauma: randomization between primary closure and exteriorization. Ann Surg 1979;190:430–6.
George SM Jr, Fabian TC, Mangiante EC. Colon trauma: further support for primary repair. Am J Surg 1988;156:16–20.
George SM Jr, Fabian TC, Voeller GR, Kudsk KA, Mangiante EC, Britt LG. Primary repair of colon wounds: a prospective trial in non-selected patients. Ann Surg 1989;209:728–33.
Chappuis CW, Frey DJ, Dietzen CD, Panetta TP, Buechter KJ, Cohn I Jr. Management of penetrating colon injuries: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 1991;213:492–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Financial support provided by Dr. Julius Stoller and the Division of General Surgery, Vancouver Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
About this article
Cite this article
Pezim, M.E., Vestrup, J.A. Canadian attitudes toward use of primary repair in management of colon trauma. Dis Colon Rectum 39, 40–44 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02048267
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02048267