Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine what factors may be responsible for the development of a stricture at the pouch-anal anastomosis after restorative proctocolectomy. METHODS: A consecutive series of 115 patients was studied retrospectively a median of 34 months (range, 4–100 months) after operation or ileostomy closure. The procedure failed in 11 patients (9.6 percent) who subsequently had to have a permanent ileostomy. Another two patients were excluded from the analysis, one of whom was awaiting ileostomy closure, whereas the other had a stricture due to a desmoid tumor. Of the remaining 102 patients, 39 (38 percent) developed an ileoanal anastomotic stricture, which was severe and persistent in 16 percent. RESULTS: The results were analyzed with the aid of multivariate logistic regression analysis. Factors which predisposed significantly to the development of an ileoanal anastomotic stricture were 1) use of the 25-mm (small) diameter stapling gun (P<0.05), 2) use of a quadruplicated reservoir (P=0.05), 3) use of a defunctioning ileostomy (P=0.03), and 4) anastomotic dehiscence and pelvic sepsis (P=0.03). The single patient whose operation failed because of a stricture had also developed pelvic sepsis associated with an anastomotic dehiscence. CONCLUSIONS: The eventual clinical, functional outcome after dilation of a stricture in the 39 patients who developed a stricture was as good as the outcome in the 63 patients who did not a develop stricture.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pemberton JH, Kelly KA, Beart RW, Dozois RR, Wolff BG, Ilstrup DM. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Long term results. Ann Surg 1987;206:504–13.
Wexner SD, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. The ileo-anal reservoir. Am J Surg 1990;159: 178–85.
Pescatori M, Mattana C, Castagneto M. Clinical and functional results after restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1988;75:321–4.
Nicholls RJ, Pescatori M, Motson RW, Pezim EP. Restorative proctocolectomy with a three-loop ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Ann Surg 1984;199:383–8.
Everett WG. Experience of restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir. Br J Surg 1989;76:77–81.
Galandiuk S, Scott NA, Dozois RR,et al. Ileal pouchanal anastomosis. Re-operation for pouch related complications. Ann Surg 1990;212:446–54.
Scott NA, Dozois RR, Beart RW, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG, Ilstrup DM. Post-operative intra-abdominal and pelvic sepsis complicating ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Int J Colorectal Dis 1988;3:149–52.
Moskowitz RL, Shepherd NA, Nicholls RJ. An assessment of inflammation in the reservoir after restorative proctocolectomy with ileoanal reservoir. Int J Colorectal Dis 1986;1:167–74.
Rauh SM, Schoetz DJ, Roberts PL, Murray JJ, Coller JA, Veidenheimer MC. Pouchitis-is it a wastebasket diagnosis? Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:685–9.
Nicholls RJ, Shepherd NA, Hulten L,et al. Workshop on pouchitis. Int J Colorectal Dis 1989;4:205–29.
Johnston D, Holdsworth PJ, Nasmyth DG, Primrose JN, Womack N, Axon AT. Preservation of the entire anal canal in conservative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a pilot study comparing end-to-end ileo-anal anastomosis without mucosal resection with mucosal proctectomy and endo-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1987;74:940–5.
Neal DE, Williams NS, Johnston D. Rectal, bladder and sexual function after mucosal proctectomy with and without a pelvic ileal reservoir for colitis and polyposis. Br J Surg 1982;69:599–604.
Johnston D, Williams NS, Neal DE, Axon AT. The value of preserving the anal spincter in operations for ulcerative colitis and polyposis: a review of 22 mucosal proctectomies. Br J Surg 1981;68:874–8.
Cohen L, Holliday M. Statistics for social scientists. London: Harper and Row, 1982.
Luchtefeld MA, Milsom JW, Senagore A, Surrell JA, Mazier WP. Colorectal anastomotic stenosis: results of a survey of the ASCRS membership. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:733–6.
Smith LE. Anastomosis with EEA stapler after anterior colonic resection. Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:236–42.
Blamey SL, Lee PW. A comparison of circular stapling devices in colorectal anastomoses. Br J Surg 1982;69:19–22.
Williams NS, Johnston D. The current status of mucosal proctectomy in the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis and adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg 1985;72:159–68.
Fok M, Ah-Chong AK, Cheng SW, Wong J. Comparison of a single layer continuous hand-sewn method and circular stapling in 580 oesophageal anastomoses. Br J Surg 1991;78:342–5.
Kissin MW, Cox AG, Wilkins RA, Kark AE. The fate of the EEA stapled anastomosis: a clinico-radiological study of 38 patients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1985;67:20–2.
Sagar PM, Lewis WG, Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D. One stage restorative proctocolectomy without temporary defunctioning ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:582–8.
Kuzu A, Lewis WG, Holdsworth PJ, Sagar PM, Johnston D. Ileo-anal anastomotic stricture after restorative proctocolectomy. Gut 1992;33:S20.
Graffner H, Fredlund P, Olsson S, Oscarson J, Peterson B. Protective colostomyin low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapling instrument: a randomised study. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:87–90.
Goligher JC. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. 3rd ed. London: Bailliere Tindall, 1975.
Fleshman JW, Cohen Z, McLeod RS, Stren H, Blair J. The ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis procedure. Factors affecting technical and functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:10–6.
Fonkalsrud EW. Update on clinical experience with different surgical techniques of the endorectal pullthrough operation for colitis and polyposis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1987;165:309–16.
Schoetz DJ, Coller JA, Veidenheimer MC. Can the pouch be saved? Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:671–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Lewis, W.G., Kuzu, A., Sagar, P.M. et al. Stricture at the pouch-anal anastomosis after restorative proctocolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37, 120–125 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02047532
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02047532