Skip to main content
Log in

Stricture at the pouch-anal anastomosis after restorative proctocolectomy

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine what factors may be responsible for the development of a stricture at the pouch-anal anastomosis after restorative proctocolectomy. METHODS: A consecutive series of 115 patients was studied retrospectively a median of 34 months (range, 4–100 months) after operation or ileostomy closure. The procedure failed in 11 patients (9.6 percent) who subsequently had to have a permanent ileostomy. Another two patients were excluded from the analysis, one of whom was awaiting ileostomy closure, whereas the other had a stricture due to a desmoid tumor. Of the remaining 102 patients, 39 (38 percent) developed an ileoanal anastomotic stricture, which was severe and persistent in 16 percent. RESULTS: The results were analyzed with the aid of multivariate logistic regression analysis. Factors which predisposed significantly to the development of an ileoanal anastomotic stricture were 1) use of the 25-mm (small) diameter stapling gun (P<0.05), 2) use of a quadruplicated reservoir (P=0.05), 3) use of a defunctioning ileostomy (P=0.03), and 4) anastomotic dehiscence and pelvic sepsis (P=0.03). The single patient whose operation failed because of a stricture had also developed pelvic sepsis associated with an anastomotic dehiscence. CONCLUSIONS: The eventual clinical, functional outcome after dilation of a stricture in the 39 patients who developed a stricture was as good as the outcome in the 63 patients who did not a develop stricture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pemberton JH, Kelly KA, Beart RW, Dozois RR, Wolff BG, Ilstrup DM. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Long term results. Ann Surg 1987;206:504–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wexner SD, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. The ileo-anal reservoir. Am J Surg 1990;159: 178–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pescatori M, Mattana C, Castagneto M. Clinical and functional results after restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1988;75:321–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nicholls RJ, Pescatori M, Motson RW, Pezim EP. Restorative proctocolectomy with a three-loop ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Ann Surg 1984;199:383–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Everett WG. Experience of restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir. Br J Surg 1989;76:77–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Galandiuk S, Scott NA, Dozois RR,et al. Ileal pouchanal anastomosis. Re-operation for pouch related complications. Ann Surg 1990;212:446–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Scott NA, Dozois RR, Beart RW, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG, Ilstrup DM. Post-operative intra-abdominal and pelvic sepsis complicating ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Int J Colorectal Dis 1988;3:149–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Moskowitz RL, Shepherd NA, Nicholls RJ. An assessment of inflammation in the reservoir after restorative proctocolectomy with ileoanal reservoir. Int J Colorectal Dis 1986;1:167–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rauh SM, Schoetz DJ, Roberts PL, Murray JJ, Coller JA, Veidenheimer MC. Pouchitis-is it a wastebasket diagnosis? Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:685–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nicholls RJ, Shepherd NA, Hulten L,et al. Workshop on pouchitis. Int J Colorectal Dis 1989;4:205–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnston D, Holdsworth PJ, Nasmyth DG, Primrose JN, Womack N, Axon AT. Preservation of the entire anal canal in conservative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a pilot study comparing end-to-end ileo-anal anastomosis without mucosal resection with mucosal proctectomy and endo-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1987;74:940–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Neal DE, Williams NS, Johnston D. Rectal, bladder and sexual function after mucosal proctectomy with and without a pelvic ileal reservoir for colitis and polyposis. Br J Surg 1982;69:599–604.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnston D, Williams NS, Neal DE, Axon AT. The value of preserving the anal spincter in operations for ulcerative colitis and polyposis: a review of 22 mucosal proctectomies. Br J Surg 1981;68:874–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen L, Holliday M. Statistics for social scientists. London: Harper and Row, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Luchtefeld MA, Milsom JW, Senagore A, Surrell JA, Mazier WP. Colorectal anastomotic stenosis: results of a survey of the ASCRS membership. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:733–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith LE. Anastomosis with EEA stapler after anterior colonic resection. Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:236–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Blamey SL, Lee PW. A comparison of circular stapling devices in colorectal anastomoses. Br J Surg 1982;69:19–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Williams NS, Johnston D. The current status of mucosal proctectomy in the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis and adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg 1985;72:159–68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fok M, Ah-Chong AK, Cheng SW, Wong J. Comparison of a single layer continuous hand-sewn method and circular stapling in 580 oesophageal anastomoses. Br J Surg 1991;78:342–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kissin MW, Cox AG, Wilkins RA, Kark AE. The fate of the EEA stapled anastomosis: a clinico-radiological study of 38 patients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1985;67:20–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sagar PM, Lewis WG, Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D. One stage restorative proctocolectomy without temporary defunctioning ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:582–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kuzu A, Lewis WG, Holdsworth PJ, Sagar PM, Johnston D. Ileo-anal anastomotic stricture after restorative proctocolectomy. Gut 1992;33:S20.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Graffner H, Fredlund P, Olsson S, Oscarson J, Peterson B. Protective colostomyin low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapling instrument: a randomised study. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:87–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Goligher JC. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. 3rd ed. London: Bailliere Tindall, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fleshman JW, Cohen Z, McLeod RS, Stren H, Blair J. The ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis procedure. Factors affecting technical and functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:10–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fonkalsrud EW. Update on clinical experience with different surgical techniques of the endorectal pullthrough operation for colitis and polyposis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1987;165:309–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schoetz DJ, Coller JA, Veidenheimer MC. Can the pouch be saved? Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:671–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Lewis, W.G., Kuzu, A., Sagar, P.M. et al. Stricture at the pouch-anal anastomosis after restorative proctocolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37, 120–125 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02047532

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02047532

Key words

Navigation